Pipelines, energy and natural resources

[Brad Sallows]

Technically there may be no veto. (Whenever consent is a condition, there is a veto.) Practically, the way the politics work there is in many cases effectively a veto.

 

[QV]

you are clutching at straws. Partnership requires a signature. A signature implies agreement. But the other conditions are dealbreakers as well. There is supposed to be an agreement on the carbon capture programme that has also hit the wall. Carney's conditions were designed to fail. imho

Even in the current world state, Canada is happy to over-regulate. There is no national urgency for this, it is in fact designed to be slow walked until failure.