C
couchcommander
Guest
No Love Pea, just no love... :'(
Re: Good Sports Bras ie: boob talk
- Thread starter GAP
- Start date
- Reaction score
- 8,393
- Points
- 1,160
I say sportsbras are overrated.
C
couchcommander
Guest
I think his point is to "let them be free". I agree. +1
Springroll
Army.ca Veteran
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 410
navymich said:That's a two-way street boys......and one that I'm not crossing alone
lol....I'm not even bothering to cross it.
I'll stand here and take pics though
C
couchcommander
Guest
navymich said:That's a two-way street boys......and one that I'm not crossing alone
Deal!!
- Reaction score
- 20
- Points
- 430
Hum, couchcommander,
you are really flat chest
!
Well, navymich, were you referring to that part of the male anatomy,
or the ''eggs ans sausage'' one?
Seem to me that to be fair, a guy should have think about his hum,
more interesting part ;D
you are really flat chest
!Well, navymich, were you referring to that part of the male anatomy,
or the ''eggs ans sausage'' one?
Seem to me that to be fair, a guy should have think about his hum,
more interesting part ;D
C
couchcommander
Guest
Yrys said:
No no no, that's not how I read it. But if you want to start a different thread as was suggested...
Anywho, ante up time!
(and there are pecks there... somewhere...)
- Reaction score
- 1
- Points
- 430
Well seeing as CC is only one to ante up with the chest thought I think it only fair we derides him mercilessly!
and pecks? where I have magnified the image so much that I have a blurry nipple but have yet to see a what you call a peck in there at all.
Para....I'm sure there is a regimental conflict in being your second somewhere, but alas I have often been terms a "Disloyal Royal" in fact a former RSM hauled me into his office just to call me that once or at least words to that effect.
Von Garvin who is your second and what are your terms Suh?
and pecks? where I have magnified the image so much that I have a blurry nipple but have yet to see a what you call a peck in there at all.
Para....I'm sure there is a regimental conflict in being your second somewhere, but alas I have often been terms a "Disloyal Royal" in fact a former RSM hauled me into his office just to call me that once or at least words to that effect.
Von Garvin who is your second and what are your terms Suh?
C
couchcommander
Guest
HitorMiss said:
ooohh, you probably got to see my scraggly nipple hair then! How hot, eh?
- Reaction score
- 1
- Points
- 210
disregard last
i concur with recceguy
they are top beautiful to watch,,,,,,,,oh my
old srmy gus point of veiw...go figure
i concur with recceguy
they are top beautiful to watch,,,,,,,,oh my
old srmy gus point of veiw...go figure
- Reaction score
- 36
- Points
- 560
couchcommander said:
At last, proof that Couch is indeed a Libertarian. (Those clever diversions in the Political threads didn't fool me at all >
). Now for your next assignment, couch me lad, start reading this board: http://forums.army.ca/forums/index.php/board,39.If you follow the advice rigorously for at least 1 hour/day, you will not be plagued by those nasty comments again........
C
couchcommander
Guest
Ah pfffft. You may all have 6-packs... but I've got my keg thank you.
Ladies like a man with a bit of meat on 'em.
(Libertarian??? I'll give you a hint, I enjoy Thucydides... and now for the one that'll give it away... along with John Burnheim).
Ladies like a man with a bit of meat on 'em.
(Libertarian??? I'll give you a hint, I enjoy Thucydides... and now for the one that'll give it away... along with John Burnheim).
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 410
UFI hi-jack:
Code Duello
Codes duello regulate "fair fights" and are supposed to prevent vendettas. They assure that non-violent means of reaching agreement have been exhausted (so, Infidel-6 may not be the best choice for your Second) and that harm is limited by both the terms of engagement, and by providing medical care. Finally, they assure that the proceedings have a number of witnesses. The witnesses assure grieving members of factions of the fairness of the fight, and help provide testimony if legal authorities become involved.
A duel would start with the challenger issuing a traditional, public, personal grievance, based on an insult, directly to the single person who offended the challenger. The challenged person had the choice of a public apology or other restitution, or choosing the weapons for the duel. The challenger would then propose a place for the "field of honour". The challenged man had to either accept the site or propose an alternate. The location had to be a place where the opponents could duel without being arrested. (In one case, the challenger was a very small, very deadly fencer, who enjoyed killing. The challenged person was a peaceful blacksmith well over 6 feet tall. He chose 10 lb sledgehammers, in 5 feet of water. The duel didn‘t take place. ;D) It was common for the constables to set aside such places and times and spread the information, so "honest people can avoid unpatrolled places."
At the field of honour, each side would bring a doctor and seconds. The seconds would try to reconcile the parties by acting as go-betweens to attempt to settle the dispute with an apology or restitution (again, Infidel-6 may not be the best choice for your Second). If reconciliation succeeded, all parties considered the dispute to be honourably settled, and went home.Each side would have at least one second; three was the traditional number.
If one party failed to appear, he was accounted a coward. The appearing party would win by default. The seconds and sometimes the doctor would bear witness of the cowardice. If reconciliation failed, the seconds would help their friend prepare for the duel, and keep alert for cheating and the authorities. Cheaters would be shot, usually out of hand. Honourable seconds sometimes shot their own friend if they found him cheating (yeah, Infidel-6 is definitely not the best choice for your Second).
The two parties would start on opposite sides of a square twenty paces wide. Usually the square was marked at the corners with dropped handkerchiefs. Leaving the square was accounted cowardice.
The opponents agreed to duel to an agreed condition, such as first blood, incapacitation, or death. While many modern accounts dwell heavily on "first blood" as the condition, manuals of honour from the day universally deride the practice as dishonourable and unmanly. Far more common was a duel until either one party was physically unable to fight or the physician called a halt. While explicit duels to the death were rare, many duels ended in death of one or both combatants because of the wounds sustained.
When the condition was achieved, the matter was considered settled with the winner proving his point and the loser keeping his reputation for courage.
Some duels miscarried because both opponents did not hear or see the starting signal.
A custom had grown (before the Irish Code Duello) of deloping, discharging one's firearm in the air (usually to one side) when two friends had quarrelled and one (or both) wished to end the duel without harming his friend or appearing cowardly. Far too often, this custom resulted in accidents and the Irish Duello forbade it.
Code Duello
Codes duello regulate "fair fights" and are supposed to prevent vendettas. They assure that non-violent means of reaching agreement have been exhausted (so, Infidel-6 may not be the best choice for your Second) and that harm is limited by both the terms of engagement, and by providing medical care. Finally, they assure that the proceedings have a number of witnesses. The witnesses assure grieving members of factions of the fairness of the fight, and help provide testimony if legal authorities become involved.
A duel would start with the challenger issuing a traditional, public, personal grievance, based on an insult, directly to the single person who offended the challenger. The challenged person had the choice of a public apology or other restitution, or choosing the weapons for the duel. The challenger would then propose a place for the "field of honour". The challenged man had to either accept the site or propose an alternate. The location had to be a place where the opponents could duel without being arrested. (In one case, the challenger was a very small, very deadly fencer, who enjoyed killing. The challenged person was a peaceful blacksmith well over 6 feet tall. He chose 10 lb sledgehammers, in 5 feet of water. The duel didn‘t take place. ;D) It was common for the constables to set aside such places and times and spread the information, so "honest people can avoid unpatrolled places."
At the field of honour, each side would bring a doctor and seconds. The seconds would try to reconcile the parties by acting as go-betweens to attempt to settle the dispute with an apology or restitution (again, Infidel-6 may not be the best choice for your Second). If reconciliation succeeded, all parties considered the dispute to be honourably settled, and went home.Each side would have at least one second; three was the traditional number.
If one party failed to appear, he was accounted a coward. The appearing party would win by default. The seconds and sometimes the doctor would bear witness of the cowardice. If reconciliation failed, the seconds would help their friend prepare for the duel, and keep alert for cheating and the authorities. Cheaters would be shot, usually out of hand. Honourable seconds sometimes shot their own friend if they found him cheating (yeah, Infidel-6 is definitely not the best choice for your Second).
The two parties would start on opposite sides of a square twenty paces wide. Usually the square was marked at the corners with dropped handkerchiefs. Leaving the square was accounted cowardice.
The opponents agreed to duel to an agreed condition, such as first blood, incapacitation, or death. While many modern accounts dwell heavily on "first blood" as the condition, manuals of honour from the day universally deride the practice as dishonourable and unmanly. Far more common was a duel until either one party was physically unable to fight or the physician called a halt. While explicit duels to the death were rare, many duels ended in death of one or both combatants because of the wounds sustained.
When the condition was achieved, the matter was considered settled with the winner proving his point and the loser keeping his reputation for courage.
Some duels miscarried because both opponents did not hear or see the starting signal.
A custom had grown (before the Irish Code Duello) of deloping, discharging one's firearm in the air (usually to one side) when two friends had quarrelled and one (or both) wished to end the duel without harming his friend or appearing cowardly. Far too often, this custom resulted in accidents and the Irish Duello forbade it.
- Reaction score
- 2,165
- Points
- 1,160
THAT was both informative and very hilarious! OK, for my second, I think that Trinity may be my best choice. Now, as an episcopalian anglican, he may be of some assistance for mediation. Having said that, as a Roman Catholic, I would require (perhaps) last rites, and I believe that episcopalian anglican clergy could administer this sacrament, if needed, to a Dogan such as me.
Now, if I get to choose weaponry, I would choose Potato Cannons with the following criteria:
(1) Said cannon must be manufactured solely by the duelers.
(2) At the beginning of the duel, both parties would have to prepare the projectile (potatoes only, please. No batteries with expended tea candles as sabots, for example).
(3) The duel is concluded when one party receives a hit to the head, throat, chest or abdomen. Hits to legs or arms don't count. You have to reload and attempt to hit the opposing party.
Oh, and shots to the groin DEFINATELY are out! Cups are mandatory!
Now, if I get to choose weaponry, I would choose Potato Cannons with the following criteria:
(1) Said cannon must be manufactured solely by the duelers.
(2) At the beginning of the duel, both parties would have to prepare the projectile (potatoes only, please. No batteries with expended tea candles as sabots, for example).
(3) The duel is concluded when one party receives a hit to the head, throat, chest or abdomen. Hits to legs or arms don't count. You have to reload and attempt to hit the opposing party.
Oh, and shots to the groin DEFINATELY are out! Cups are mandatory!
