That's a fair assumption, if not that, they are in final stages to crossing the 't's' and dotting the 'i's'. I'm sure that the embedded CDN crew members over the last few weeks have been extensively debriefed for their observations and comments.
If we (hypothetically- I have no inside knowledge) opt for the KSS III and buy 12, along with the ones the ROKN have, this would still make it one of the largest class of DE subs produced in modern times.
I'm not following your logic. They are building the KSS III, and starting development on a nuke boat. They will operate their KSS IIIs, likely for decades, just like Canada would if they bought them.
If we (hypothetically- I have no inside knowledge) opt for the KSS III and buy 12, along with the ones the ROKN have, this would still make it one of the largest class of DE subs produced in modern times.
Back of the napkin math - for what its worth - the article quotes approx. 655,000 'job years' over the lifespan of the project. If we apply that number against the 12 subs, that's approx. 54,000 'job years' per sub. Apply that over a 25yr lifespan, that's 2,180 'job years' for sub.
Orphaned, in what sense?
If we (hypothetically- I have no inside knowledge) opt for the KSS III and buy 12, along with the ones the ROKN have, this would still make it one of the largest class of DE subs produced in modern times.
Canada is not the only country SK is trying to sell the KS-III to. They have also proposed a variant(1) of the KS-III to the Philippines and possibly to Greece which is looking to purchase four subs.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.