- Reaction score
- 32
- Points
- 330
Mountie said:Let's try to revive an old topic.
I realize there is no plan to replace the Griffon in the near future. However, when the time comes, or "if" it were being replaced now, what would the best option be?
Would the Griffon be able to take the same upgrade as the UH-1Y Venom of the USMC? Or would the RCAF be better off with the UH-60 Black Hawk?
I think best-case scenario would be a common fleet of H-60 variants for the MHP and UTTH fleets. MH-60R Sea Hawk ASW variant and MH-60S Sea Hawk General Support variant for the MHP to replaced the failed CH-148 Cyclone procurement. To replace the CH-146 Griffon would be the UH-60M Black Hawk utility variant (with option to convert to AH-60 Battle Hawk attack variant when needed), the MH-60M Black Hawk special operations variant, and the HH-60M Rescue Hawk in the SAR/Base Rescue/Combat Support role. This would give a common fleet for ease of training, maintenance and logistics as well as being inter-operatable with the US military.
MHP - 18 MH-60R AWS & 12 MH-60S GS
UTTH - 48 UH-60M
SAR - 10 HH-60M
Special Ops - 12 MH-60M
Total of 100 aircraft
A friend of mine (an RCAF Seaking Pilot) was flying Seahawks with the USN when the CBC reported that pilots couldn't escape from the Seahawk if it ditched. He was furious because he felt that a mix of Seahawks and blackhawks would've met Canada's needs economically. While I'm not an expert he was. He agreed with you. The numbers he would propose I'm sure would've been different but the concept was a good one. he woud also point out that the hawk family is the developed world's most used helo.