I'm curious what you're getting at with this post. I clearly indicated that I support the idea of a state funded news organization, with a mandate to provide news in underserved/unserved locations.
The point of my post you're quoting is that the CBC is clearly state funded, while other news organizations are controlled/influenced through their parents corporations, which are subsidized through the government... Making the state subsidization/influence less clear.
i.e. The GoC supporting CBC is good, and it's a clear linkage between the state and the news. The GoC supporting BCE, Rogers, etc., is not good, because it makes the connection between the state and the news less clear.
Like I said, if the RCN is worried that a canape will influence a LCdr to favour LM, the Canadian public should be concerned that $40M CAD will influence BCE/Bell Media/CTV News.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.