Petamocto said:
I bring it up only as a demonstration that I am well aware of all sorts of people in the CF who have had NDs and not had the integrity to bring themselves up on charges, not as any sort of personal crusade.
I ask you to please help me try to understand the lessons you have presented in this thread thus far.
You are saying that the WO (who had more than two months of troop leadership experience, and was not caught on video) should have manned up and reported himself. Therefore, the first lesson you are offering is that he showed a major failure in leadership and integrity, which is very unlike the BGen.
Second lesson, you as newly trained Lt had a ND which was a failure in conduct and weapons discipline. There are all sorts of other people who have them but do not charge themselves. This is dissimilar to a BGen with more than 2 months command experience having a ND.
Third lesson, you knew the WO had a ND and you did not report him. You showed questionable integrity by protecting him. You "admit (this) was my biggest lapse in judgement (sic) so far in uniform."
Fourth lesson, because it was caught on video, you had no choice but to man up, therefore, the troops should see you as having integrity and after a short period of chuckling and reflection they should respect you. The BGen reported himself to the NIS. The NIS conducted an investigation and have charged him with NDA 129. This makes you and the BGen comparable because you were both commanding troops?
Fifth lesson, you went before a summary trial and did not offer any mitigating evidence about any other NDs. You showed questionable integrity by continuing to protecting the WO and should be respected because you took one for team, like the BGen.
Sixth lesson, because you were charged as an officer, the Presiding Officer made an example of you and you received a substantial fine, 5 x what a soldier would get. So the BGen, who is an officer with more than 2 months of command experience, should get at least the same fine you got (or maybe 5 x the fine you got).
Seventh lesson, “every soldier needs to be in control of his rifle, but his integrity means even more. TFK Comd's integrity points will go up more than his fieldcraft stock will go down.”
Eighth lesson, “And at the end of the day, nobody is infallible in terms of mistakes. However, there is a difference between making a mistake and doing wrong. To lie about it would have been to do wrong, and would not have been recoverable from.”
Ninth lesson, this BGen in a Multinational Command role has IYHO showed good judgment.
As well could you please explain these:
IYHO was your ND considered "making a mistake"?
Did the Presiding Officer have the same opinion?
IYHO, is a big "lapse in judgment" - a mistake or doing wrong?
Is/was the "biggest lapse in judgment" recoverable from?
How does any of this compare to the BGen's current situation?
Thanks for helping me to understand your contributions to this thread.
(IYHO - In your humble opinion)