• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

The Capital Punishment Debate

Should it be brought back?


  • Total voters
    137

Attachments

I'd be trying to figure out what to order for my Last Meal .
 
The last execution in Canada was in 1962. I wonder how many of the people who say they want it were alive then.
 
The last execution in Canada was in 1962. I wonder how many of the people who say they want it were alive then.
I was and I am. But if as Pierre said Life means life I could live with the alternative but if I recall correctly that became cruel and unusual because it didn't give the murderer a chance to redeem himself/herself. He was quite specific when it came to the murder of police/corrections officers too.
 
I think many , myself included, could tolerate something like this,

If we execute murderers and there is in fact no deterrent effect, we have killed a bunch of murderers. If we fail to execute murderers, and doing so would in fact have deterred other murders, we have allowed the killing of a bunch of innocent victims. I would much rather risk the former. This, to me, is not a tough call." John McAdams - Marquette University/Department of Political Science
 
I am ok with a limited amount of Capital Punishment, with strict criteria equating to a high bar to be met and a case review after conviction
 
Not I. Changes in forensic technology have shown us the fallibility of the justice system. Beyond a reasonable doubt is already a dammed high bar, and we still get it wrong sometimes. The risk to confidence in the State and its institutions, not to mention the people actually involved, when it turns out later that we got it wrong, is irreversible.

We were absolutely convinced, beyond a reasonable doubt, that David Milgaard, Guy Paul Morin and Steven Truscott were guilty - until they weren't.
 
Back
Top