• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

The Great Gun Control Debate- 2.0

So I see lots of details now about "Scary Rifles". What about "Scary Pistols"?
 
How many of you CPC voters would vote liberal if the only thing he did differently from what he is doing is make gun ownership easier?
That probably is a significant single-issue voter motivator (attractor/killer). But on that file, he'd have to somehow set it back to the way it was decades ago and create some kind of nigh-irrevocable structures that couldn't be overturned by a future LPC or LPC/NDP government.
 
Mauser action sniper rifles, no one needs a "Weapon of war to hunt"
At the end of the day, most “gun control” groups won’t be happy unless all civilian ownership of firearms is banned.

They also fail to see that most countries with total firearm bans end up abusing their citizens ASAP as no effective means of resistance is allowed.
 
At the end of the day, most “gun control” groups won’t be happy unless all civilian ownership of firearms is banned.

They also fail to see that most countries with total firearm bans end up abusing their citizens ASAP as no effective means of resistance is allowed.

"a gun behind every blade of grass" I think was something the Japanese considered when contemplating invading mainland USA... I think it goes like that. So it's not just your own government seeing the strength vs weakness.
 
Some people fondly "remember" the time when peasants were forbidden weapons, or certain classes of weapons. Otherwise, they were hard to pillage.
I wonder how many times someones house needs broken into before they're willing to buy a $800 Semi-Auto for $5000
 
100% in agreement.

The LPC has made it clear that it views all legal firearms owners as murders/criminals in waiting. I won't vote for people who think of me that way.

Maybe it's time to devolve firearms down to the provincial level, I say that knowing that my Con (Soft LP) NS Gov would probably do what what ever Ont does anyways.
 
At the end of the day, most “gun control” groups won’t be happy unless all civilian ownership of firearms is banned.

They also fail to see that most countries with total firearm bans end up abusing their citizens ASAP as no effective means of resistance is allowed.
And we Canadians wonder why the US citizenry hold their Second Amendment rights so dearly. America is the product of a tyrannical government - an oafish British king - and the Founding Fathers basically said the government needs to be afraid of the people, not the other way round.

Australia has pretty much banned private ownership - to what extent I don't know.
 
And we Canadians wonder why the US citizenry hold their Second Amendment rights so dearly. America is the product of a tyrannical government - an oafish British king - and the Founding Fathers basically said the government needs to be afraid of the people, not the other way round.
110%.
Australia has pretty much banned private ownership - to what extent I don't know.
Australia banned semi automatic rifles and pistols. However, they ended up walking back a lot of the semiauto bans, as they found the farmers needed them to control both the kangaroo and other rodent populations. So you now need a permit for a semi auto but from some friends in Australia, they aren’t really that hard to get if you don’t live in an urban area.

Compliance also in Australia seemed a little low, but they allowed people to basically remove the gas tube from AR15 style rifles to make them bolt actions. If theoretically, the gas tube hole was supposed to be plugged. But I know a bunch of people that never did that, and their firearm was still deemed in compliance.
That might be because the local law-enforcement was friendly to them.

It was also interesting as Australia as their government had no problem, giving me a permit to drive all over Australia with a ton of ammo and machine guns and suppressors and things like that.
 

LILLEY: Carney misses mark on gun buy-back, spends foolishly on pet project


The government is going to contact every gun owner (heh) and provide information about surrendering their guns to the police.

Except most police departments don't seem interested and are refusing to be a part.

Maybe the government can get the military to collect the firearms? Threaten to cancel the pay raise if they don't take part.
 
Last edited:

LILLEY: Carney misses mark on gun buy-back, spends foolishly on pet project


The government is going to contact wvery gun owner (heh) and provide information about surrendering their guns to the police.

Except most police departments don't seem interested and are refusing to be a part.

Maybe the government can get the military to collect the firearms? Threaten to cancel the pay raise if they don't take part.

I would refuse that order and take what comes. Consider me conscientious objector like those that wouldn't take the jab.
 
Back
Top