- Reaction score
- 6,167
- Points
- 1,260
geo said:Ummm..... at this stage in the game..... SO WHAT ?
Omar Khadr is the one on trial.
The Gov't of Canada has investigated, found that they had erred in their handling of the Arar case & paid a bundle for it.
...
The "so what" is the Mr. Justice O'Connor never heard any evidence from US sources.
According to the Globe and Mail:
Mr. Arar first addressed the Afghanistan question at a Canadian news conference a month after he was released from a year's detention in a Syrian prison. “I have never been to Afghanistan,” he said at the time. “I have never been anywhere near Afghanistan.”
However, within a week, Canadian officials – who were never identified – leaked the confession Mr. Arar gave under torture in Syria, which suggested he attended a training camp for several months in 1993. At that time, Mr. Khadr would have been six or seven years old.
Mr. Justice Dennis O'Connor, who headed the Canadian commission that looked at the Arar affair, concluded in 2006 that “there is no evidence to indicate that Mr. Arar has committed any offence or that his activities constitute a threat to the security of Canada.”
The commission completely sidestepped the question of whether Mr. Arar went to Afghanistan, taking the position that it was not relevant to its mandate.
The Globe has previously reported that a former Afghan training camp instructor, Mohamad Kamal Elzahabi, who was arrested in the U.S. in 2004, also told the FBI Mr. Arar had been to Afghanistan.
Justice O'Connor was very narrow in his findings - as he had to be based upon his interpretation of his mandate.
It is very difficult to decide what value ought to be placed on anything Khadr said about pretty much anything and anybody. It may true, or mistaken identity or an attempt at disinformation. I doubt we'll ever know - but I also doubt we'll ever know all of Maher Arar's story either.