- Reaction score
- 7,159
- Points
- 1,090
Honestly I think US air development is glacial. They have a process which they follow which includes two competing bids and then multiple changes to the project as the USAF keep changing the requirements as it moves along.I thought it was an interesting article - but I thought the 2040 IOC date was a little unrealistic.
The NGAD concepts had been flying since around 2018, ~7 years before the F-47 was selected, and some of the stuff in that program had been worked much earlier than 2010. Even fast tracked I think the announcement that the F-47 will be operational by the end of PUTUS47's term is unlikely.
Realistically it took the US 15 years to get the F-47 to the point of contract award, and at best another 3 years to having a flying sample. The F-22 took 6 years from award of contract from the prototype stage - to get to flight stage.
2040 is 15 years from now, and with no companies that have built a 5th Gen Aircraft, let alone 6th Gen, so to say that I am suspect of 2040 as an actual date to have operational aircraft is putting it mildly. While there maybe prototypes flying I cannot see them being a LRIP let alone full scale production to provide aircraft in any sort of numbers.
Now those Air Forces that have F-35 no doubt can greatly assist FCAS, but the F-35 isn't a F-22 by any stretch, and while a lot of the software, radars and munitions have a jump, I am not sure the actual airframe is in any sort of way ready to go to even a prototype flying sample which will take years to refine.
I think once Japan, UK and Italy nail down the requirements and who does what they have a much narrower window of options to distract them. And Japan has a hard deadline. There was a lot of Japanese previous work done for their version of the F-22 that didn't fly. So they are probably stealing a bit from that.
That said, I agree that the timeline is very aggressive.