• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

The RCAF's Next Generation Fighter (CF-188 Replacement)

You missed Lockheed is combat systems integrator for River Class including as you mentioned Aegis. RQ9B (Hellfires) , C130J and I’m sure other kit. Being the largest defence contractor in the world, Lochmart is bound to involved some of our contracts.
Sikorsky is owned by LM as well, although it isn't clear if they are still losing money on the Cyclones...
 
Sikorsky is owned by LM as well, although it isn't clear if they are still losing money on the Cyclones...
Well if the RUMINT is correct that we are ditching the Cyclones and most likely buying 28-36 Seahawks, there's a another 8-10 billion for LM.
 
It's almost like retired RCAF officials are some of the only people who can speak out on behalf of the RCAF for the F-35 without the potential of punishment for interference? If you want to call people shills, the amount of high ranking former Canadian officers hired by the US MIC basically precludes any official from speaking on the topic at all.
LtGen Jamie Speiser-Blanchet has publically supported a 5th gen airforce. I think much of ‘entertaining’ Gripen is theatre to pressure Trump on trade. Personally, if the commander says she needs 5th gen, I would support her. I just don’t think either aircraft fully delivers on our needs. IMHO, Gripen obviously lacks the range and load capacity but is easily serviceable. Panther is the opposite. Panther has stealth which could be valuable on missions flying out of Europe but is probably of little value in NORAD. I also believe we need to increase the number of squadrons and locate such Europe. Closing Baden was probably a mistake.

I’m not convinced Tom Lawson and Billie Flynnn are speaking on behalf of RCAF. Speaking on behalf of Lockheed, 100%. They were paid employees of Lockheed and if successful in their lobbying will no doubt be rewarded in the future.
 
IMHO, Gripen obviously lacks the range and load capacity but is easily serviceable.

Is there any data to support this claim, on a paper airplane? What makes the Gripen easier, cheaper, quicker, to turn than the F-35?
 
Saab, Boeing and BAE teaming up on the Red Hawk as RAF's Fighter Lead In Trainer to replace the Hawk.


I find it interesting that since being shut out of the US F35 competition Boeing seems to have been keener than LM to team up with foreigners.

Aussie Ghost Bat CCA
Swedish GLSDB for the MRLS
Swedish Red Hawk...

Or maybe it is just me.
 
Saab can match American-made F-35s to fulfil Canadian needs: Swedish deputy prime minister



Sweden going all in here
 
Saab can match American-made F-35s to fulfil Canadian needs: Swedish deputy prime minister



Sweden going all in here
If it sounds to good to be true -
 
The fact all these european countries, Australia, SK, etc are buying the F35 when they could get anything they wanted speaks loudly. Canada still “reviewing” this is peak idiocy and tells you this government isn’t serious about actual capability.
 
Saab can match American-made F-35s to fulfil Canadian needs: Swedish deputy prime minister



Sweden going all in here

Sweden’s deputy prime minister says Saab is prepared to fill any gap in Canada’s capability needs if the federal government decides to deviate from its American Lockheed Martin deal and purchase fighter jets from several companies.

“Saab would be the ones that would have to answer for details of that sort,” Ebba Busch said in an exclusive interview on CTV Power Play with Vassy Kapelos on Tuesday. “But the way that we have looked into this, together with our Canadian counterparts, we think that we can match what is needed for the Canadian interests.”

When asked by Kapelos whether Saab could fill the gap if Canada doesn’t go forward with the remaining 72 jets made by Lockheed Martin, Busch said: “The short answer is yes.”
So now Sweden is going to fill any gaps in the RCAF if we walk away/cut back the F-35 procurement? With what exactly? Sure as hell not with the Gripen E, given how Sweden just recently took delivery of their first aircraft, Brazil's orders have been delayed off their original schedule and there is other customers like Colombia and Thailand who are ahead of us on the order book hypothetically. Production of the E model is slow and backlogged, unless Saab is going to send us their own slowly delivering stock or try to pry additional airframes out of Brazil? Is the plan to shuffle off Sweden's existing Gripen C/D fleet off onto the RCAF to hold us over until we set up domestic production? Saddle us with old updated airframes to replace our ancient updated airframes?

The fact that Saab and Sweden is just blatantly pitching nonsense like this without the media calling them out is laughable. It's the classic Saab media blitz with a questionable plan hiding behind the glossy brochure. This unsolicited bid gets more and more questionable as time goes on, I hope nobody in positions of power is actually falling for this farce upon even a cursory glance.
 
So now Sweden is going to fill any gaps in the RCAF if we walk away/cut back the F-35 procurement? With what exactly? Sure as hell not with the Gripen E, given how Sweden just recently took delivery of their first aircraft, Brazil's orders have been delayed off their original schedule and there is other customers like Colombia and Thailand who are ahead of us on the order book hypothetically. Production of the E model is slow and backlogged, unless Saab is going to send us their own slowly delivering stock or try to pry additional airframes out of Brazil? Is the plan to shuffle off Sweden's existing Gripen C/D fleet off onto the RCAF to hold us over until we set up domestic production? Saddle us with old updated airframes to replace our ancient updated airframes?

The fact that Saab and Sweden is just blatantly pitching nonsense like this without the media calling them out is laughable. It's the classic Saab media blitz with a questionable plan hiding behind the glossy brochure. This unsolicited bid gets more and more questionable as time goes on, I hope nobody in positions of power is actually falling for this farce upon even a cursory glance.
They dont strike me as the type to not have a plan, I wouldn't be surprised if the loaned us the first few off the line until domestic production starts
 
So now Sweden is going to fill any gaps in the RCAF if we walk away/cut back the F-35 procurement? With what exactly? Sure as hell not with the Gripen E, given how Sweden just recently took delivery of their first aircraft, Brazil's orders have been delayed off their original schedule and there is other customers like Colombia and Thailand who are ahead of us on the order book hypothetically. Production of the E model is slow and backlogged, unless Saab is going to send us their own slowly delivering stock or try to pry additional airframes out of Brazil? Is the plan to shuffle off Sweden's existing Gripen C/D fleet off onto the RCAF to hold us over until we set up domestic production? Saddle us with old updated airframes to replace our ancient updated airframes?

The fact that Saab and Sweden is just blatantly pitching nonsense like this without the media calling them out is laughable. It's the classic Saab media blitz with a questionable plan hiding behind the glossy brochure. This unsolicited bid gets more and more questionable as time goes on, I hope nobody in positions of power is actually falling for this farce upon even a cursory glance.
Time will tell.
 
They dont strike me as the type to not have a plan, I wouldn't be surprised if the loaned us the first few off the line until domestic production starts
Considering the Swedish airforce is already behind on their own acquisitions with multiple customers in the pipeline and a potential near decade long wait before Canada is ready to deliver its own aircraft, that strategy comes off as questionable for all parties involved here.
 
Considering the Swedish airforce is already behind on their own acquisitions with multiple customers in the pipeline and a potential near decade long wait before Canada is ready to deliver its own aircraft, that strategy comes off as questionable for all parties involved here.
We said the same thing about the NSPS originally but Sweden also has a strategic industry to preserve. They have avested interest in slowing down till now.
 
The fact all these european countries, Australia, SK, etc are buying the F35 when they could get anything they wanted speaks loudly. Canada still “reviewing” this is peak idiocy and tells you this government isn’t serious about actual capability.
And the fact other Scandinavian countries picked the F-35 over the Gripen.
 
Back
Top