Quirky
Army.ca Veteran
- Reaction score
- 4,531
- Points
- 1,260
How many fighters need to be ordered before an assembly line starts making money?
The RCAF's Next Generation Fighter (CF-188 Replacement)
- Thread starter WingsofFury
- Start date
How many fighters need to be ordered before an assembly line starts making money?
- Reaction score
- 7,024
- Points
- 1,190
Saab wants the same corporate welfare treatment Irving gets: free money to pay for the full plant construction/retooling and then they get to keep the profit.
Prairie canuck
Member
- Reaction score
- 256
- Points
- 780
That's definitely from the Bombardier playbook. Whether Saab follows that playbook or has it's own is yet to be seen.
If or (should I say) when a major shooting war begins, everyone involved is probably going to frantically put in orders for more aircraft. LM is going to be inundated and despite ramping things up to increase its production capacity for F-35s, further delays are inevitable. If we have the ability to manufacture a secondary fighter in addition to having F-35s, we at least won’t be as badly off as some other countries should a conflagration occur.
IKnowNothing
Army.ca Veteran
- Reaction score
- 2,045
- Points
- 990
One of the big arguments against switching the order I've seen is the combined inneficciency of a split fighter fleet and of making the necessary infra and security investments for such a small number of airframes- my devious hat wonders if those messages have resonated in an unintended way, and the delay is in figuring a dance partner in Europe for 16 F35's. Not even off the lot, still have that new fighter smell
- Reaction score
- 5,854
- Points
- 1,160
When a major shooting war begins it's very likely to be a "come as you are" affair. Losses will likely far exceed any potential production capacity to replace lost aircraft (assuming that production isn't interrupted by enemy action).
- Reaction score
- 5,374
- Points
- 1,260
But not the F35’s, not going to have any meaningful losses at all, no need to gear up replacements at all.
Rainbow1910
Sr. Member
- Reaction score
- 1,716
- Points
- 810
Great to see Saab seemingly changing their bid already, when it seems only a day or so ago this factory was predicated on the RCAF placing an order. This very much is sounding to me like a pitfall in the waiting for the Canadian Government set by Bombardier and Saab together, follow along for a moment.
Saab promises 10,000 jobs for Canadians if we set up Gripen E construction and assembly in Canada in conjunction with Bombardier, Canadian Govt agrees because there is no strings attached to adopt the aircraft. Fast forward a few years when the facility is either mostly done or finished with substantial Canadian investment, Ukraine's fanciful 100-150 letter of intent for Gripen's is slashed or vanished entirely because they were betting on somebody to pay their bills for them. Saab turns to Canada and goes "well those 10,000 jobs were contingent on that Ukrainian order, so Canada needs to place an order or we slow/shutter this brand new facility due to lack of work."
That sweet deal suddenly becomes a big sunk fallacy, and you have some very difficult decisions to make for something that was pitched as not being a prerequisite in the first place. Now it's 2035 and you are being forced to adopt another inferior fighter in a world of stealth jets and unmanned wingman fighters.
Saab isn't any different than any other player in military industrial complex, for as much as they like to lean into the friendly, cost effective and neutral Scandinavian facade. They will gladly take advantage of us as much as Irving, Davie or any American company ever would.
- Reaction score
- 5,374
- Points
- 1,260
And there it is -
www.thestar.com
Future of trade talks depends on Canada’s purchase of American fighter jets, U.S. ambassador says
Future of trade talks depends on Canada’s purchase of American fighter jets, U.S. ambassador says
Pete Hoekstra said it will not be easy to restart the now-stalled trade talks, and urged Canada to "harmonize" as much as possible with the U.S. on a range of
www.thestar.com
HavokFour
Army.ca Veteran
- Reaction score
- 1,850
- Points
- 1,040
And there it is -
Future of trade talks depends on Canada’s purchase of American fighter jets, U.S. ambassador says
Future of trade talks depends on Canada’s purchase of American fighter jets, U.S. ambassador says
Pete Hoekstra said it will not be easy to restart the now-stalled trade talks, and urged Canada to "harmonize" as much as possible with the U.S. on a range of
You know it's bad when you can't tell if it's just him being the worst ambassador they've sent us in recent memory, or the official position.
- Reaction score
- 5,374
- Points
- 1,260
There’s a difference?
I will always be a dual fleet even tri fleet person. 1 Platform does not do it all, no matter how much we want to believe it will. We also open ourselves to fleet wide groundings with a single fleet.
If Canada was to buy 65 or 88 F35s and 100 Gripens (or F16, I would prefer F15s)then I think it would be a good start to rebuilding the Airforce fighter fleet.
We could use the Gripen for our aerial acrobatic team, a new (restart) Nato fighter training plan and Forward deploy and use them for our Misions overseas that do not require a Stealth Aircraft.
As for those who think that SAAB will pack up shop (Gripen) and leave jobs swinging in the wind have not read the overall context of what so being offered. The 10,000 jobs include Fighter Assembly, manufacturing, Surveillance aircraft, ground equipment, R&D for future system, land sea and air. In my opinion this is a large opportunity for Canada to partner with a country who values us as a valuable partner not only servants and a hassle to deal with. Canada brings a lot to the table as far as R&D in various tech industries along with skilled labor, and support . We also have large tracks of land they can test new equipment on, land sea and air.
If Canada was to buy 65 or 88 F35s and 100 Gripens (or F16, I would prefer F15s)then I think it would be a good start to rebuilding the Airforce fighter fleet.
We could use the Gripen for our aerial acrobatic team, a new (restart) Nato fighter training plan and Forward deploy and use them for our Misions overseas that do not require a Stealth Aircraft.
As for those who think that SAAB will pack up shop (Gripen) and leave jobs swinging in the wind have not read the overall context of what so being offered. The 10,000 jobs include Fighter Assembly, manufacturing, Surveillance aircraft, ground equipment, R&D for future system, land sea and air. In my opinion this is a large opportunity for Canada to partner with a country who values us as a valuable partner not only servants and a hassle to deal with. Canada brings a lot to the table as far as R&D in various tech industries along with skilled labor, and support . We also have large tracks of land they can test new equipment on, land sea and air.
The US is getting a bit desperate for support I think. They have failed to overall strongarm Europe into buy America.
