• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

The War in Ukraine

The 51st GRAU going up in flames might have been a very serious blow, if this today and Russia's sudden willingness to freeze along current lines and give up claims on Ukrainian soil it doesn't occupy aren't just a coincidences that just happened right after.

It's still blowing up by the way, as of posting. Munitions are landing as far as 8KM away.

Alt: https://archive.ph/O9iU8

Anyway, here's more drone stuff. First video features a Pantsir-S1 failing to hit a drone twice while it circled it's target.

In the first video, it’s nice to see the Russians paying 55.7 Rubles per litre for gas. That’s about .93/litre Canadian$.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0764.jpeg
    IMG_0764.jpeg
    210.9 KB · Views: 3
Expensive as shit for the average Russian.
2.7x at least
In the first video, it’s nice to see the Russians paying 55.7 Rubles per litre for gas. That’s about .93/litre Canadian$.
Average Russian Monthly Wage is 87.9k while that fuel price is 55.7/L, as the average fuel price in Russia for a L of fuel is over 60Rubles and has been going up every month since mid last year. Some estimates have it going well over 120 Rubles / L this year.

Average Canadian Monthly Wage is 5.6k while Canada's current average fuel price is $1.30/L
 
Beware of tripwires, they don't work as well anymore...

"The new forms of warfare, from drones to glide bombs, are completely alien to armies which last fought (and lost to) Afghan tribesmen with their inventive use of roadside bombs, mobile phones and Honda 125cc scooters."

Ukraine. Beware the semantic minefield​



The dangers to Ukraine multiply. The international focus on President Trump’s tariffs has sucked attention away from Ukraine just as Gaza did in 2024. Trump’s threat to walk-away from a peace deal adds further jeopardy as does Europe’s increasingly unconvincing attempts to demonstrate collective resolve. Linked to this last point is a potentially fatal linguistic carelessness.

Barbara Tuchman in her epic The Guns of August recounts that in 1910 Major-General (later Field Marshal Sir) Henry Wilson discussed with French General Ferdinand Foch the possible size of any British force which might be committed in the event of a continental war.

‘What is the smallest British military force that would be of any practical assistance to you?’ Wilson asked.

Foch’s replied, ‘A single British soldier – and we will see to it that he is killed.’

In April 1982 the British politician Enoch Powell berated the Royal Marines on South Georgia and the Falklands for surrendering without suffering any fatalities following the Argentine invasion. He even suggested that a court martial should be convened.

These two stories explain the importance of the badly-named tripwire concept. The whole point is that the invader should be deterred by the risk of killing troops belonging to a powerful nation which would then retaliate. The second and implicit strand to the tripwire idea is that, to act as a deterrent, the offended nation must have credible military or economic resources to deliver a coherent retaliation.

 
The second and implicit strand to the tripwire idea is that, to act as a deterrent, the offended nation must have credible military or economic resources to deliver a coherent retaliation.
I've quoted this before. I still believe in it.

The gold standard of deterrence and assurance is a defensive posture that confronts the adversary with the prospect of operational failure as the likely consequence of aggression.

David Ochmanek, et al. “U.S. Military Capabilities and Forces for a Dangerous World” RAND Corp 2017, 45 https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR1782-1.html
🍻
 
Back
Top