• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

The War in Ukraine

West Germany was invited to NATO, despite West Germany claiming all of Germany as its territory…

There is a precedent for that, and another ‘Cold War’.
True, but there was more deeply-held consensus among the invitees re: how "bad" the bad guys of the day in question were. Mind you, it IS a good point for the lawyers/diplomats to bring up.
... The remaining Hezbollah forces need to support Syria, as they will lose access to Iranian arms if Syria falls.
Kinda ironic (and sweet) Hezbollah & Co. getting kicked at both ends simultaneously.
Greece and Turkey have also been at war over Cyprus and yet…
I suspect they'll get the same "can you claim ALL your land as being under your control" admission questionnaire entry, too. Maybe those are "the conditions" the president's talking about?

Meanwhile, in other news, R.I.P.
Also archived here. A bit more here:
 
A bit of tea-leaf reading - different statements post-Halifax from UKR's rep there, showing different asks of different folks. First, meeting with Joly & Blair ....
1733056459386.png
... then with some Canadian Senators ...
1733056502978.png
... and with U.S. Senators attending
1733056584377.png
1733056604960.png
 

Volodymyr Zelenskyy suggests Ukraine would give up Russian-occupied territory for NATO membership​



At least it's a start point.
Only AFTER full membership is signed and ratified by all 32 NATO members, not just based on some sort of MOU or a position part way through the accession process
 

Volodymyr Zelenskyy suggests Ukraine would give up Russian-occupied territory for NATO membership​



At least it's a start point.
And here's the other end of the negotiating spectrum according to Reuters talking about POTUS47's nominee as UKR special envoy, Keith Kellogg ...
1733079424802.png
Since POTUS47 promised to end the war within 24 hours after inauguration, it'll be interesting to see:
  • how much UKR is willing to move away from NATO membership (given UKR's president's latest salvo);
  • how willing USSR 2.0 is to some to the table when it doesn't appear to GAF about grinding their machine down further; and
  • how willing NATO member states'll be to accept UKR as a member with bits in the hands of the bad guys (although, as mentioned by others upthread, there has been precedent for NATO taking members that were sorta cut in half).
All this between now and January 21 (hell, let's go with the 22nd) -- that's 52 days as of this post. 🍿
 
Shame about that whole "no territorial disputes in play" thing before being able to join NATO.

Meanwhile, not everyone seems to be showing up to the party - or leaving early.
Not sure Croatia had ironed out all their issues with Bosnia and Serbia before they joined.
 
Here's hoping he delegates the Ukraine file and decisions to Kellogg and Rubio and that Hegseth does not survive confirmation

The sense I am getting is that Trump is picking pro and con advisors and looking for arguments he can adjudicate.

Guessing his preferred course of action is going to be a mug's game.

He wants to keep his options open and be unpredictable.

2c.
 
If you want to try figure out how Trump’s head works, you should start by reading 'The Art of the Deal'. You'll get a good idea about his approach to negotiating and working things to his advantage.
 
If you want to try figure out how Trump’s head works, you should start by reading 'The Art of the Deal'. You'll get a good idea about his approach to negotiating and working things to his advantage.

Except he didn't write it. It was a ghost writer.

 
Given that they managed to send Finland and Sweden running into NATO's outstretched arms, and will likely see Ukraine (and perhaps others) join as well at some point, I'd say that's a pretty good trade.

But it's not my country...

Finland and Sweden in NATO is good I guess but does Russia care?
you have the decimation of large parts of Ukraine vs the decimation of huge proportion of Russia's military capability
both have suffered disastrous losses from a population standpoint that they really couldnt afford
what happens to the people in the occupied Ukrainian territories?
Russia gets Crimea and its land bridge to it. To me thats a win for Russia and a loss for Ukraine but I dont think its decisive from a NATO standpoint


Depends. Does Ukrainian forces still hold the Kursk region?
i think the Ukrainians are losing ground there and elsewhere while the Russians continue to take huge losses
 
Have not seen this map before. Sets out a 20 year plan for absorbing Ukraine into NovoRussia


That said my 2¢ is that (1) a chunk of Kursk will still be in Ukrainian hands by mid January (2) Russia will gave gained another few thousand square km of fields, treelines and pulverized villages (3) Putin will not agee to negotiate under any of Trumps terms or conditions as he still thinks he has the upper hand (4) Ukraine will not agree to negotiate under any of Trumps terms or conditions as handing over hundreds of thousands of their citizens to the Russian Gulag and putting much more of Ukraine under direct fire control and effectively losing access to exports via the Black Sea

I am not sure how SK will react to the rapidly increasing level of human and equipment support to Russia by NK, or how Poland (and friends) will respond to assist an abandoned Ukraine but I highly doubt they will submit to Putins or Trumps plans for eastern Europe.
 
Last edited:
There was past discussion of a 'winter offensive' in previous years when the ground froze after the fall rainy season in Ukraine.

I'm wondering if the UKR forces will do a winter push to try and punch through somewhere before the Presidential handover date?

A swath of destruction via ATACMS/Storm-shadow/HIMARS to open a corridor, then punch through into a rear area? Change the game a bit?
 
There was past discussion of a 'winter offensive' in previous years when the ground froze after the fall rainy season in Ukraine.

I'm wondering if the UKR forces will do a winter push to try and punch through somewhere before the Presidential handover date?

A swath of destruction via ATACMS/Storm-shadow/HIMARS to open a corridor, then punch through into a rear area? Change the game a bit?

Not likely as they're running out of people and 'stuff'...

 
Not likely as they're running out of people and 'stuff'...

I think they used their last offensive power to invade the Kursk oblast to use as a bargaining chip going forward. They will need the winter to re-group, re-arm and re-train their next batch of offensive power.
 
Back
Top