• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

The War in Ukraine

He must of made sure to stay away from windows, had to do it the old fashion way
 
  • Humorous
Reactions: ueo
Gotta be some misreporting here. A colonel as acting CO of a Combined Arms Army? No way.

Following up from my last reply. Perhaps the reason a Colonel was put in charge there is because the experience required for such a command is quite literally all dying. The "alternative" Generals might only have the rank due to having certain friends or family, and not any actual skills one would get working their way up the ladder.

 

Turn On GIF by Alexis Tapia
 
My take on it is this...

Trump is trying to end the war - and that is a very good thing.

It's easier to be seen as a harbinger of peace when you aren't supplying weapons to either side...

Since his efforts to end the war haven't been fruitful yet, he has no choice but to send more weapons to Ukraine.


(It isn't so much a hot & cold switch being flicked - if Trump had his way they would all he sitting at a negotiating table & he wouldn't have to send any weapons. But circumstances are what they are, so weapons shall be sent after all...)
 
Apparently he never ordered a stop.

He ordered an accounting of certain munitions to verify the numbers, and a few choice folks in his DoD administration decided to shut it off.
Hegseth would have absolutely leaped at that opportunity.
 
Apparently he never ordered a stop.

He ordered an accounting of certain munitions to verify the numbers, and a few choice folks in his DoD administration decided to shut it off.

Normally you'd expect a person with so many fuckups not even 1 year into the new term to get the boot right about now. Perhaps because said person is one of the very few who would go along with the bosses domestic adventures.
 
I'm shocked, SHOCKED that USSR 2.0 would be capable of such things ....
From the court itself:
In the case of Ukraine and the Netherlands v. Russia the Court held Russia accountable for widespread and flagrant abuses of human rights arising from the conflict in Ukraine since 2014, in breach of the European Convention.

The case concerned the conflict that began in eastern Ukraine in 2014 following the arrival in the Donetsk and Luhansk regions of pro-Russian armed groups, and escalated after Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine beginning on 24 February 2022. It also concerned the shooting down of flight MH17 over eastern Ukraine in summer 2014, killing all those on board, many of whom were Dutch nationals.

The Court found that Russia was responsible for repeated human-rights violations over a period of more than eight years. This included indiscriminate military attacks; summary executions; torture, notably rape as a weapon of war; unlawful and arbitrary detentions; intimidation and persecution of journalists and religious groups; looting and destruction of private property; and the organised removal of children to Russia and their adoption there.

The Court also found that Russia was responsible for violating the right to life by shooting down flight MH17 and had added to the profound suffering of the crash victims’ next of kin by being uncooperative and obstructive in the context of international efforts to uncover the truth.
Bit more in the attached statement from the court's info-machine.
 

Attachments


Quote from the article that shows how real the Baltic States take the threat from Russia
The crash prompted heightened security measures in the capital, Vilnius. Prime Minister Gintautas Paluckas and Speaker of Parliament Saulius Skvernelis, who were meeting with reporters at Government House when the news broke, were escorted to a secure shelter as a precaution, local media reported.
Also it occurs to me that you hear very little discussion in the West about the use of decoy drones. It seems to me that this would be something that would be pretty easy to put into mass production and their use would be useful in both attriting enemy AD missile stockpiles as well as helping to locate enemy AD systems for destruction.
 

Quote from the article that shows how real the Baltic States take the threat from Russia

Also it occurs to me that you hear very little discussion in the West about the use of decoy drones. It seems to me that this would be something that would be pretty easy to put into mass production and their use would be useful in both attriting enemy AD missile stockpiles as well as helping to locate enemy AD systems for destruction.
Most of the UAS used in Ukraine are cheaper than the decoys the West uses — so in this case it’s better to get more payload drones - as really the decoys would need to be basically the same thing without a live ordnance payload / and so the only difference would be the ‘boom parts’ from the ballast parts.
 
Most of the UAS used in Ukraine are cheaper than the decoys the West uses — so in this case it’s better to get more payload drones - as really the decoys would need to be basically the same thing without a live ordnance payload / and so the only difference would be the ‘boom parts’ from the ballast parts.
Looking at the picture of the Russian decoy in the article they don't look like they would cost much at all if you get them made in a local machine shop rather than from a defence contractor...
 
Back
Top