• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

The War in Ukraine

Is it hopium or does something seem to have flipped. Im not saying the tides are turning but Russia seems especially vulnerable right now.

Hitting a missile corvette on the inland waterways 500km north of Moscow is quite an “up yours!” demonstration of deep strike capabilities. I wonder what they got it with?
 
Hitting a missile corvette on the inland waterways 500km north of Moscow is quite an “up yours!” demonstration of deep strike capabilities. I wonder what they got it with?
Shoulda hit Kremlin and Vlads compound on the way past!
 
Can't be tooooooooo careful these days ....
Lookit how far it is from UKR to this place (heart to red marker - scale on bottom right) - someone's trying belt and suspenders for protection.
1759688007567.png
 
I'm liking this new trend. Russia strikes a Ukrainian power plant, Ukraine responds in kind.



Edit: In fact there is a new video from Anders Puck Nielsen outlining this emerging strategy now that Ukraine has the means (and domestic production) to do so.


One thing I think he is getting wrong is the Ukrainian interest in the Tomahawk. I think it is more of a "Canadian" exercise. Zelensky wants to carry an American standard with him into this next campaign.

According to available OSInt Flamingo's 1000 kg warhead is 2x that of Tomahawk's 450 kgs.

Flamingo apparently flies 3000 km while Tomahawk is closer to half of that, about 1500 km.

But more importantly the US has contracted for 56 new Tomahawks in 2026.

Ukraine is building 50 Flamingoes a month. And pushing for 200 a month by January. What the US could supply in a year Ukraine could supply in a week.

Bigger warhead.
Longer range.
Produced faster.

And produced locally with Ukrainian labour, materials and money in Ukrainian facilities. It boosts national GDP. It doesn't require spending money overseas.

It is sustainable.

Assuming they can protect their factories.
 
One thing I think he is getting wrong is the Ukrainian interest in the Tomahawk. I think it is more of a "Canadian" exercise. Zelensky wants to carry an American standard with him into this next campaign.

According to available OSInt Flamingo's 1000 kg warhead is 2x that of Tomahawk's 450 kgs.

Flamingo apparently flies 3000 km while Tomahawk is closer to half of that, about 1500 km.

But more importantly the US has contracted for 56 new Tomahawks in 2026.

Ukraine is building 50 Flamingoes a month. And pushing for 200 a month by January. What the US could supply in a year Ukraine could supply in a week.

Bigger warhead.
Longer range.
Produced faster.

And produced locally with Ukrainian labour, materials and money in Ukrainian facilities. It boosts national GDP. It doesn't require spending money overseas.

It is sustainable.

Assuming they can protect their factories.
Guidance. Tomahawk allows strikes a lot more precise if you are trying to hit something specific or something in a very specific place.
 
Guidance. Tomahawk allows strikes a lot more precise if you are trying to hit something specific or something in a very specific place.

So if you want to flatten the Kremlin send Flamingos.
If you want to fly through Vlad's window while one of his doubles is having tea, send a Tomahawk?
 
Shouldn't have made Trump look like a fool... more than usual that is ;)

‘Will lead to destruction of relations’: Putin warns US against sending Tomahawk to Ukraine​

With a range of 2,500 kilometres (1,550 miles), Tomahawk cruise missiles would enable Ukraine to strike the Kremlin and all of European Russia.



 
Another player wants in the game.


It's domestic and comparable competition.

Palianytsia (missile) - 650km range, ~50-100kg warhead

Peklo (turbojet drone) - 700km range, 50kg warhead
 
Back
Top