• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

The WTF News Files

Interesting the opposition arguments, even when this passed in 2023: "... Opponents say they're concerned about odors, kids being traumatized and community health violations ..." Elsewhere on the boards, some folks suggest this sort of thing might be good as a way to teach more people - including youth - where food comes from and the natural order of things. We'll have to see how it continues to unfold, right?

Late add: More from both sides of the 2023 debate ...
... and more recently, it sounds like things are not exactly going swimmingly, governance wise, on Hamtramck council.
 
Last edited:
Interesting the opposition arguments: "... Opponents say they're concerned about odors, kids being traumatized and community health violations ..." Elsewhere on the boards, some folks suggest this sort of thing might be good as a way to teach more people - including youth - where food comes from and the natural order of things. We'll have to see how it unfolds, right?
Hamtramck used to be 100% Polish when I was a kid growing up in Windsor. My Mom knew a lot of people from their when she was younger, she grew up in a 90% Polish, 10% Irish neighborhood in Detroit close by. We used to go to Polish bakery and deli stores in Hamtramck during the weekend and bring it all back to Windsor. Some of the best rye/caraway seed bread came from there.
 
It does seem odd just going by the short clip, but we don't know the evidence presented or defence raised.
From this:
... The judge said there were two reasons the crash could have happened: Dhaliwal was distracted or the brakes on the bus she drove were faulty.

Dhaliwal did not testify in her own defence, but her lawyers argued the brakes on the bus she was driving failed, and she had to use a hand brake to eventually stop the bus.

A mechanic for the Crown testified that the brakes on the bus were working at the time of the collision, but the defence called that witness unreliable.

The Crown also told the judge it was their theory that the brakes were working, but Dhaliwal didn’t apply them due to a “pattern of inattention” on the day of the deadly crash.

In his final decision, the judge called the series of events “bewildering.”

“Taking all the evidence together, the mystery of what caused this accident has not been solved. Brake failure remains a viable possibility,” Harris wrote.

“Contrary to this, proof in a criminal case requires a high degree of certainty as expressed in the beyond a reasonable doubt standard. Reasonable doubt must be excluded. That standard, in my view, has not been achieved. The Crown has failed to convincingly remove brake malfunction as the cause of the collision.” ...
 
Back
Top