Jarnhamar
Army.ca Myth
- Reaction score
- 7,943
- Points
- 1,160
It will be ironic if Mr "Harris not becoming president is a setback for women's progress" doesn't support a female LPC party leader.JWR would be a solid choice. Does she want the job ?
It will be ironic if Mr "Harris not becoming president is a setback for women's progress" doesn't support a female LPC party leader.JWR would be a solid choice. Does she want the job ?
While the irony would be sweet, if he was at ANY level of classy, he wouldn't necessarily endorse any contender - oh, yeah, right ....It will be ironic if Mr "Harris not becoming president is a setback for women's progress" doesn't support a female LPC party leader.
UK doesn't have a written constitution, and this prorogation is arguably a routine one for the party in power to change over to a new leader. Just because it's a westminster parliament doesn't mean it sets any kind of precedence in Canada. Phillippe Lagasse is a policy wonk, not a lawyer.![]()
Expect a court challenge if Justin Trudeau puts Parliament on pause
Prime Minister Justin Trudeau should get ready to go to court if he prorogues Parliament to dodge an expected non-confidence vote in Januarynationalpost.com
Some snips:
In a landmark fall 2019 ruling, the U.K. Supreme Court put the brakes on then prime minister Boris Johnson’s bid to silence Parliamentary debate ahead of the Oct. 31 Brexit deadline.
The court’s unanimous 11-0 decision nullified Johnson’s earlier request to the Queen to put a five-week pause on Parliament at the height of a political crisis over Britain’s imminent withdrawal from the EU. The prime minister and his fellow MPs went back to work the next day.
“If (Canada’s) Parliament were prorogued in such a way as to escape accountability, and prevent Parliament from playing its constitutional role, then that would be constitutionally problematic.”
Carleton University professor Philippe Lagassé, who studies executive power in Westminster states, says he agrees.
“I could see a similar challenge in Canada,” Lagassé said in an email. “The underlying issue would be comparable… would a prorogation frustrate an unwritten principle of democracy?”
Constitutional scholar Stéphane Sérafin said the challenge would likely be put to the Federal Court, which hears disputes over the federal government’s lawmaking powers.
“Once (jurisdiction) is established, the court could grant declaratory relief on the terms it considers appropriate,” said Sérafin.
“An appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada is not necessarily going to happen because it needs to grant leave.”
And Singh will say that the financial needs of the country (ie appropriations) trump the need to bring down the government....It will be a brand spanking new session. One of the first orders of business will be appropriation bills that are mandatory confidence votes. I see the Opposition pulling the trigger as soon as one of those votes comes up in the House.
This. And his pension - be still my cynical heart ...And Singh will say that the financial needs of the country (ie appropriations) trump the need to bring down the government....
I see what you did there...And Singh will say that the financial needs of the country (ie appropriations) trump the need to bring down the government....
He's eligible for his pension some time in February, so he'll be fine.This. And his pension - be still my cynical heart ...
I think you’ll see a few throw their hats in the ring to gain more name recognition, not necessarily to win but it sets up for the next run.Good question. I think she's smart enough to read the writing on the wall re: the party's fate right now, and at around 50 years old or so, could also be a contender by the time people get tired of Team Blue down the road. Crazier has happened, right?
He's eligible for his pension some time in February, so he'll be fine.
Ugh.
Wildest thing I read today was Ret. General Rick Hillier endorsing Christy Clark on Twitter for liberal leader.....like what a weird time line
He's eligible for his pension some time in February, so he'll be fine.
And if the experience of some parties post-big time loss/decimation, combined with possible splintering within the party, who knows how many leadership sweepstakes will happen before the election after this one? Or before the election where Canada’s tired of Team Blue?I think you’ll see a few throw their hats in the ring to gain more name recognition, not necessarily to win but it sets up for the next run.
@brihard shush. Using logic and reasoning that is contrary to the "selfish greed" narrative is a bootable offence.Singh ran a defense lawyer practice, drives a Maserati and wears Rolex. I don’t understand why anyone truly thinks he’s substantially motivated by a relative pittance of a six year Parliamentary pension at age 65? He probably stands to make more money out of Parliament than in it.
I'm trying to imagine why any person with serious potential would voluntarily sign up to be the captain of this sinking ship. Two type of people come to mind, but I think the 2nd will be more likely. First, someone extremely naive who has drank too much coolaid and doesn't spend enough time on Twitter to see how hated the LPC has become and genuinely believe they can bail out the ship. Second, is someone who doesn't actually care that their stint at prime minister will be short lived. They will go in the annals of history as one of Canada's prime ministers, and will likely be set up well into the future for having "taken the bullet" for the party. (this is assuming an election doesn't happen before they are sworn in as PM)I think you’ll see a few throw their hats in the ring to gain more name recognition, not necessarily to win but it sets up for the next run.
I'm trying to imagine why any person with serious potential would voluntarily sign up to be the captain of this sinking ship.
One term politician who runs a medical supply company that did well with federal contracts during the pandemic.Who the heck is Frank Baylis?
You don't stay rich by willingly giving up tens of thousands a year.Singh ran a defense lawyer practice, drives a Maserati and wears Rolex. I don’t understand why anyone truly thinks he’s substantially motivated by a relative pittance of a six year Parliamentary pension at age 65? He probably stands to make more money out of Parliament than in it.