• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Trump administration 2024-2028


So he will create a group dedicated to “govt efficiency” - adding a govt agency to cut the size of the govt.


200.gif
 

So he will create a group dedicated to “govt efficiency” - adding a govt agency to cut the size of the govt.


200.gif

Getting Trump to name it DOGE was admittedly a good troll.
 
Nothing could possibly go wrong here…

So . . . Mike Flynn on the board???


So he will create a group dedicated to “govt efficiency” - adding a govt agency to cut the size of the govt.


200.gif
Well if anyone knows how to cut a workforce its Elon.

🍻
 
Trump has found his C.D. Howe? Or Roosevelt's dollar a year men?


Elon Musk to lead new efficiency department named after his favourite cryptocurrency

Tesla mogul will head up Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) with Vivek Ramaswamy, to ‘dismantle bureaucracy and slash regulations’
www.telegraph.co.uk




The Roosevelt model? "Don't you know there is a war on?"

After 1940, antitrust enforcement virtually shut down. Liberals were upset that ALCOA was a big, bad monopoly. But, as Secretary of War Stimson observed, "I'd rather have more sinful aluminum now than good aluminum too late for the war." Nevertheless, the government did finance a competitor in Reynolds Aluminum, which helped to motivate ALCOA to produce aluminum and gave the government a second supplier.

Despite the entente with business, FDR was still willing to go forward on the employment of blacks and women, in part because he believed that full productivity and wartime morale required it. He also continued to advance trade unionism. He did insist, for example, that Ford Motor Company live up to its responsibilities under the Wagner Act. When Ford refused, Roosevelt cancelled a lucrative government contract. This helped to produce the momentum for the big Ford strike in the spring of 1941 that brought the first union into Ford. But on other regulatory issues FDR compromised. A government that depended on these businesses to mobilize during the war could not be slapping them with antitrust suits at the same time.

Basically, Roosevelt made the decision that he had to mobilize the proprietors of the mines, the factories, and the shops. He realized Congress could provide the money, but it could not build the planes, design the tanks, or assemble the weapons. Without the cooperation of industry, massive production would never get off the ground. So the challenge was to bring the proprietors of the nation's chief economic assets into the defense effort as active participants. He recognized also that private business could not find all the capital required for the expansion of the plants nor take the risk that the end of the war would leave them with no orders and excess capacity. So the federal government, through the Reconstruction Finance Corporation, advanced the necessary money to expand the factories, often leasing them to industry. The government developed new sources of supply for raw materials and created quick mass transportation. The government also went into the business of producing synthetic rubber and aluminum, as well as other emerging industries, and helped stimulate new technologies.

Contrary to the stereotype of a wartime "command economy," there was a remarkable entrepreneurial spirit in sharp contrast to the situation in Germany or in socialist, centrally planned economies. Roosevelt brought in dozens of top business executives as "dollar-a-year" men to help run the government commissions so that businesses didn't feel the government was simply telling them what to do. He allowed business to realize profits. He used government to create markets and to help business set up new plants and equipment, which business often leased and later bought cheaply after the war.

It is hard for us to imagine today how such an entrepreneurial spirit could co-exist with war mobilization, but one did. One reason, of course, was the opportunity to profit, though the wartime tax on excess profits prevented the kind of windfalls made during World War I. More fundamentally, a spirit developed within each business enterprise to produce better than its competitors to serve the country. In his fireside chats, Roosevelt explained to the people over and over again why their productive genius had to be mobilized to win the war. Buoyed by the strong morale the president fostered, business and labor worked together to get the "E-for-excellence" citations that he spread around. It was not just producing more than your competitor, it was producing more than you did the previous quarter, and the quarter before that.
Click to expand...


The Way We Won: America's Economic Breakthrough During World War II

High growth needn’t require a war.
prospect.org
 
So, what happens if the Republican-state NG goes into a Dem state and the Dem Governor doesn’t want them there?

Will Smith Reaction GIF


Miller has suggested supplementing ICE resources with military planes and National Guard troops, including sending troops from Republican-governed states into neighboring states with Democratic governors. He proposed adding detention space by using tents or “camps.”

 

Trump names Fox News host as defense secretary

Appointment of Army veteran and network contributor follows series of earlier nominations to president-elect’s Cabinet
www.telegraph.co.uk

Another National Guardsman? I think that makes three or four so far.
More importantly, a staunch Trump loyalist. The telegraphing of a concerted Trumpification of the upper ranks of the armed services is one of the more concerning things we’re seeing so far from the administration-to-be.
 
More importantly, a staunch Trump loyalist. The telegraphing of a concerted Trumpification of the upper ranks of the armed services is one of the more concerning things we’re seeing so far from the administration-to-be.


Further to...

Trump to go after ‘woke generals’ with ‘warrior board’ executive order​

President-elect could have military top brass screened in move away from inclusion and towards war-fighting ability

Tony DiverUS Editor, in Washington DC

12 November 2024 10:55pm GMT


Donald Trump is considering establishing a “warrior board” to review senior officers in the US military and weed out “woke generals”, according to reports.

A draft executive order under consideration by the president-elect’s transition team would set up a board of retired senior officials to audit top brass that do not meet standards of “leadership capability, strategic readiness, and commitment to military excellence”.

The move is thought to be Mr Trump’s first step in tackling the issue of “woke generals”, which he complained about on the campaign trail, arguing that diversity and inclusion politics had become more important than war-fighting ability.

A copy of the order, seen by the Wall Street Journal, suggests the process will effectively be outsourced to trusted former officers.

The suggestion comes amid Pentagon fears of a purge after Mr Trump takes office on Jan 20 next year.

The Republican platform policy document formally signed off at the party’s National Convention before the presidential election promised to “get woke Left-wing Democrats fired as soon as possible”.

Mr Trump has said that any generals involved in the chaotic withdrawal from Afghanistan should resign by lunchtime on the day he takes office.

Called general a ‘loser’​

The former president has faced criticism from several of the generals who served in his first administration, including Gen Mark Milley, who called him “fascist to the core”. In return, Mr Trump called Gen Milley a “loser”.

The pair clashed in 2021 after Mr Trump called for the officer’s resignation over his comments about critical race theory in a congressional hearing.

“On the issue of critical race theory, etc, a lot of us have to get much smarter on whatever the theory is,” Gen Milley said.

Mr Trump said later that he had “defended critical race theory being shoved down the throats of our soldiers”.

Separately, Jack Teixeira, a former Massachusetts Air National Guard member, was on Tuesday sentenced to 15 years in prison for sharing Pentagon secrets online.

Prosecutors said he had leaked information about US support for Ukraine and a foreign adversary’s plot to target American forces on the social media site Discord.

Teixeira said: “I wanted to say I’m sorry for all the harm I’ve wrought and I’ve caused. I can’t really sum up how contrite I am that my behaviour has caused such a maelstrom.”

 
Telegraph's summary to date.



Team Trump: Who’s in and who’s out​

The appointments, including key foreign policy, immigration and judicial position, represent Mr Trump’s vision and priorities for his return

Cameron Henderson. Benedict Smith

13 November 2024 1:58am GMT


Donald Trump is locked in talks with his closest advisors carefully vetting and picking his team to run the country in 2025.

Top government positions are being handed out to his most loyal followers and surrogates from the campaign trail, with meetings taking place in Mar-a-Lago to finalise selections.

The appointments - including key foreign policy, immigration and judicial position, represent Mr Trump’s vision and priorities for his return to the White House.

Chief of staff​


Susie Wiles​

Susie Wiles was Donald Trump’s first appointment, a reward for managing his election campaign and return to the White House

It marks a rare moment in the spotlight for Ms Wiles, a veteran political operator who will now go down as the first woman in history to be appointed to the top Washington job.

Inside the freewheeling Trump campaign, she was seen as a steady hand who was able to impose some amount of order and discipline. Mr Trump, when he paid credit to her on election night, called her the “ice maiden”.

She is known to have good relations with Democrats, understands the workings of DC as a former lobbyist, and is a strategic thinker rather than a political hatchet-man.

Mr Trump had a famously fractious relationship with his chiefs in his first term, going through four in as many years. If Ms Wiles can be as effective inside the White House as she was outside it, then she will prove a savvy pick.

Stephen Miller, deputy chief of staff​

Stephen Miller is set to be Ms Wiles’s deputy. He is her opposite: a loud and polarising figure who enjoys the limelight and creates headlines with his rhetoric on immigration.

Whereas Ms Wiles is the effective backroom operator, Mr Miller brings a streak of ideological purity, having joined the Trump campaign as a senior policy adviser back in January 2016. He is now widely expected to be appointed deputy chief of staff.

Advertisement

As the first Trump administration cycled between various “acting” homeland security secretaries, Mr Miller was seen as the real power in the department.

He was the architect of the controversial “Muslim ban”, and has been in charge of drawing up plans for the largest mass deportation in US history when Mr Trump returns to office.

The 39-year-old took to the stage at Mr Trump’s Madison Square Garden rally in October, where he declared: “America is for Americans and Americans only.”

His prominent role in the administration signals that immigration is at the heart of the incoming president’s policy priorities.

Government efficiency​

Elon Musk​

Billionaire Elon Musk will co-lead a new Department of Government Efficiency, Mr Trump confirmed on Tuesday night.

The Tesla boss will run it alongside Vivek Ramaswamy, a Trump ally who ran against the president-elect for the Republican nomination.

Mr Musk had been widely tipped to play a key role in the new administration, having been one of the highes-profile figures on the campaign trail.

The acronym of the new department, DOGE, coincides with the name of the cryptocurrency Dogecoin that Mr Musk promotes.

Border ‘tsar’​


Tom Homan​

Tom Homan is another immigration hawk who was quickly appointed to the new Trump administration, being named as the president’s “border tsar”.

A former border agent who became head of immigration enforcement in Mr Trump’s first term, he was the man behind the controversial policy that saw children separated from their parents when they crossed the border illegally.

Mr Trump later reversed the programme amid a backlash but the return of Mr Homan may signal that it is being considered as part of an immigration clampdown.

A bruiser who has drawn plaudits for Right-wingers, he is likely to be charged with pushing through a hardline immigration agenda against the protests of Democrats.

If anything, he appears to be relishing the challenge – pledging to override Democratic governors and warning them to “get the hell out of the way” soon after his appointment.

UN ambassador​


Elise Stefanik​

Elise Stefanik will end up leaving Congress shortly after winning re-election after Mr Trump announced her as his UN ambassador.

Once considered a moderate Republican voice, the 40-year-old Harvard graduate is a symbol of the party Mr Trump has remade in his own image, becoming one of his most ardent defenders after criticising him in 2016.

She is a staunch supporter of Israel and will represent the US at a body she has criticised as being actively hostile to Benjamin Netanyahu’s government.

Ms Stefanik also claims to have backed “every single” measure to aid Israel during her time in Congress, and just hours before her appointment became public accused the Biden administration of letting down “our great ally”.

She made headlines this year for questioning several Ivy League heads about anti-Semitism on campus, several of whom later resigned.

Secretary of state​


Marco Rubio​

Mr Trump looks set to pick Marco Rubio to the role of America’s top diplomat, despite nicknaming him “little Marco” as they clashed while competing for the Republican presidential nomination in 2016.

In the time since, however, the Florida senator has managed to ingratiate himself in the president-elect’s orbit, and earlier this year was seriously considered as a running mate before losing out to JD Vance.

Mr Rubio would mark a more conventional pick as secretary of state, and his position in the Senate could smooth his confirmation. He is a foreign policy hawk, and particularly tough on Russia and China, as well as Venezuela.

In 2023, he authored legislation requiring a presidential exit from Nato to be supported by Congress – something that could potentially constrain the incoming president, who is sceptical of the military alliance.

The Florida senator has earned a reputation as one of the Senate’s Iran hawks, and his appointment would signal the administration intends to take a tough stance on the regime.

In April, he opposed billions of dollars in military aid in Ukraine, and said that the war has reached a “stalemate” and needed to be “brought to a conclusion”.

National security advisor​


Mike Waltz​

Mike Waltz, a former Green Beret turned congressman, is tipped to become Mr Trump’s national security advisor when he returns to the White House in January.

Drawing on his special forces career, Mr Waltz has emerged as one of the key critics of the Biden administration, calling the withdrawal from Afghanistan a “horror movie” and complaining that it has gone far too soft on China.

Europe and the Russian invasion of Ukraine is taking up much-needed attention from the Pacific, where he believes China is a major threat.

“American munitions and defence production are aiding Ukraine instead of deterring Chinese aggression in the Indo-Pacific,” he wrote in The Economist this month.

As such, the US should “bring the conflicts in Ukraine and the Middle East to a swift conclusion, and finally focus strategic attention where it should be: countering the greater threat from the Chinese Communist Party”.

He may also resist the deal for Britain to hand over the Chagos islands, where the US has a key military base. He sees the deal as a major capitulation to growing Chinese influence in the region.

Attorney general​


Mike Davis​

A Right-wing firebrand and regular guest on Steve Bannon’s “War Room” podcast, Mike Davis’s appointment would turn heads for his pledge to go after Mr Trump’s enemies.

The lawyer and outspoken Trump loyalist has worked in all three branches of federal government – the Justice department, Congress and the Supreme Court – and has been privately touted as a potential attorney general by the president-elect, The Washington Post reported.

Under the previous Trump administration, Mr Davis, 46, helped the president-elect install two Supreme Court justices and greenlighted Mr Trump’s blitz of appointments to the lower courts in his role as a Senate aide.

Described by Mr Trump as “tough as hell”, Mr Davis has previously said he would like to send journalists to “the gulag” and put migrants in “cages”. Following Mr Trump’s election win, he wrote on X, formerly Twitter, that he would like to drag Democrats’ “dead political bodies” through the streets and “burn” them.

Mike Lee​

Mike Lee, 53, has been touted as one of Mr Trump’s top picks for the head of the justice department.

Like many of Mr Trump’s staunchest allies, the Utah senator has undergone something of a damascene conversion over the past decade. Having launched a last-ditch bid to block Mr Trump from winning the Republican nomination in 2016, he was heavily involved in efforts to keep the president-elect in power after the 2020 election.

Mr Lee has also been suggested by Mr Trump as a potential Supreme Court pick and is a vocal critic of the federal indictments against the president-elect. He has made working to limit the powers of the federal government central to his policy agenda.

Ken Paxton​

Mr Trump has said he would consider Ken Paxton, 61, for the role of attorney general, describing him as a “very talented guy”.

The Texas attorney general is a Trump loyalist who waged an abortive legal challenge to the president-elect’s 2020 election defeat. He also spoke at the Trump rally that preceded the Capitol riot in January 2021.

Mr Trump has previously shown loyalty to Mr Paxton, coming to his defence last year after he was accused of accepting bribes. This and other legal challenges have loomed over the Texan for the past decade.

To repay this loyalty, Mr Paxton has gone out to bat for the president-elect, Jack Smith, the prosecutor who has been pursuing Mr Trump, of “weaponising the justice system” in his indictments against Mr Trump.

Mr Paxton has waged legal battles on transgender issues and has taken a tough stance on immigration law. His appointment would put these issues front and centre of Mr Trump’s legal agenda.

Homeland security secretary​


Kristi Noem​

Kristi Noem, 52, is widely expected to be announced as Mr Trump’s homeland security secretary.

The South Dakota governor would be in charge of a broad brief, covering the border, cyber threats, emergency response and terrorism.

In her role, she is expected to work closely with Tom Homan and Stephen Miller to deliver Mr Trump’s immigration agenda.

A Trump loyalist who rose to national attention during the pandemic for refusing to employ a statewide mask mandate, Ms Noem was once touted as a potential VP pick. However, the tide of GOP opinion turned against after she revealed, in a peculiar passage from her book, that she had once killed her pet dog because she didn’t think it was an effective hunter. The incident triggered widespread controversy and reportedly killed off her bid for vice-president.

Having dropped out of college aged 22 to run her family ranch, Ms Noem was elected as South Dakota’s first female governor in 2018.

During the presidential campaign, she danced alongside Mr Trump when his rally in Philadelphia descended into an impromptu disco. The footage went viral.

Energy secretary​


Doug Burgum​

Doug Burgum is seen as the most likely energy secretary pick after early reports that he was seen as the frontrunner to become Mr Trump’s “energy tsar”.

The former North Dakota governor, while running for the Republican nomination last year, made “dramatically” increasing energy production one of the key themes on his campaign website.

Mr Trump has constantly pushed his plans to unleash fossil fuel production on the campaign trail, and Mr Burgum is seen as a big backer of the oil and gas industry. That should be no surprise – more than half of the taxes collected by the state come from oil extraction and production taxes.

The president-elect has publicly praised his former primary rival, telling supporters at a rally this year that he “probably knows more about energy than anybody I know”.

Dan Brouillette​

Dan Brouillette is seen as another potential energy secretary, having served in that role in Donald Trump’s first term between 2019 and 2021.

He would be more adept at navigating DC than Doug Burgum, having previously served as deputy energy secretary before reaching the top job, and before that working in the department for two years under George W. Bush.

Mr Brouillette spent a stint at the helm of lobbying group Edison Electric Institute, but stepped down in late October. It may signal that a return to government is on the cards.

Defence secretary​

Pete Hegseth​

In something of a showbiz Cabinet, Mr Trump has picked a Fox News host to be his defence secretary.

Pete Hegseth, a former Army National Guard officer who served in Iraq and Afghanistan, currently hosts the weekend episodes of Fox & Friends, one of Mr Trump’s favourite TV shows.

He is reportedly a friend of the president-elect, who has often appeared on the programme.

Mr Hegseth, 44, lacks senior military or national security experience and takes on the role at a time of acute global divisions.

Treasury secretary​


Robert Lighthizer​

Robert Lighthizer, 77, served as Mr Trump’s trade representative for the entirety of his first term – a rare bit of continuity in the president elect’s orbit.

In that time, Mr Lighthizer slapped tariffs on China and strong-armed Canada and Mexico into renegotiating the North American Free Trade Agreement.

He has played a leading role in economic preparations throughout the transition, specifically on Mr Trump’s sweeping tariffs agenda.

On Tuesday night The Wall Street Journal reported that Mr Trump was considering making Mr Lighthizer is administration’s trade tsar.

Whether he serves Mr Trump as treasury secretary or returns to his previous role, as sources told the Financial Times, remains to be seen.

The former steel industry lawyer has spent his career railing against free trade and foreign competition, and his book, No Trade Is Free, is a searing rebuttal of the consensus that encouraged trade liberalisation.

His policy agenda closely mirrors that of Mr Trump, and his appointment would likely signal a full-blooded continuation of the tariff agenda pursued during the president-elect’s first term.

John Paulson​

Reports suggested Mr Trump has privately touted John Paulson as his treasury secretary. And in a recent interview, Mr Paulson outlined how he would work with Elon Musk in Mr Trump’s administration.

The 68-year-old billionaire hedge fund manager is a long-term Trump supporter, having donated to all three of his presidential campaigns. In April, he hosted a fundraiser at his Palm Beach home that raised $50.5 million for the president-elect.

Mr Paulson has said he would prioritise tax cuts and slashing federal spending, with a particular focus on cutting green energy subsidies (a favourite Trump talking point.)

“All of these tax subsidies for solar, for wind, inefficient, uneconomic energy sources,” Mr Paulson told the Wall Street Journal. “Eliminate that. That brings down spending.”

The Wall Street titan made much of his estimated $4.9 billion fortune in the lead up to the 2008 financial crash by betting against the US subprime mortgage lending market.

But Mr Paulson has since ruled himself out of consideration owing to “complex financial obligations”.

He said: “My complex financial obligations would prevent me from holding an official position in President Trump’s administration at this time,” adding that he would continue to work with Mr Trump on implementing his policy agenda.

Howard Lutnick​

Howard Lutnick, 63, is the co-chair of Mr Trump’s transition team tasked with staffing thousands of roles in the incoming administration.

The billionaire chief executive of financial services firm Cantor Fitzgerald has been a major fundraiser for Mr Trump, first publicly supporting him in 2020.

He has also been a vocal proponent, speaking at the president-elect’s controversial Madison Square Garden rally, which Democrats compared to a Nazi gathering.

Should Mr Lutnick be asked to lead the Treasury, it would throw up potential conflict of interest. The department is currently investigating the cryptocurrency firm Tether, which he has promoted.

The digital currency has allegedly been used by Mexican drug cartels to facilitate payments, and as Treasury Secretary, Mr Lutnick would have oversight of any possible sanctions against the firm.

The offices of Cantor Fitzgerald were formerly based at the World Trade Centre, and on 9/11 Mr Lutnick lost hundreds of employees as well as his brother. He is known for his charity efforts to support families affected by the attacks.
 
More importantly, a staunch Trump loyalist. The telegraphing of a concerted Trumpification of the upper ranks of the armed services is one of the more concerning things we’re seeing so far from the administration-to-be.
He was not shy about all of this during his campaign. This is what the American public voted for, and these are the consequences.
 
So, in that case, men should be abstinent until marriage too, right?

Meanwhile:

View attachment 89040
Oh look... crazies from one side mocking crazies from the other.... Nut Picking 101.

If you think either "side" in this represents the average voter for the Dems or GOP, you're in an echo chamber/ideologically captured.
Freedom to vote, then publicly announcing your choice, doesn’t mean freedom from consequences.

Plenty of posts like this on social media right now, including some from some US folks I know. FAFO, I guess.
That tells me they come from a dysfunctional family, and nothing more.

If you think all people who didn't vote like you are bad, you're actually part of the problem of polarization. Not all GOP voters are Nick Fuentes, and not all Dem voters are rabid misandrists/identarians. Most are normal people, who have different concerns, and think one party of the other is better positioned to deal with them.
 
If Trump won #46 he would have had a Democrat house and senate.

Now he has the house, senate, supreme court, and popular vote.

Inshallah, MyWhyt.
how does this support the claim that trump supports the constitution when he has openly talked about getting rid of it?
 
Even better... ;)

Will Trump Eliminate The Department Of Education? | Forbes Topline

President-elect Donald Trump has repeatedly vowed to shutter the federal Department of Education and relegate all educational responsibility to individual states—a move that could impact crucial funding for K-12 schools and hamper civil rights enforcement—but experts warn it’s unlikely the federal government will be able to be hands off when it comes to education regulation, even if the department is closed.


Colleges too....

 
Last edited:
Less than a week ....





The mood from official Ottawa is starting to look very weird. Ministers are showing early signs of straying outside federal policy.

The most bizarre example is Deputy Prime Minister Chrystia Freeland’s recent comments to a Ukrainian group in Edmonton, reported by energetic independent journalist Jeremy Appel in his substack, The Orchard.

To loud applause, Freeland said Russian oil is funding the war against Ukraine. She promised to help “eliminate” it from world markets.

“I want to tell you, and this is the first room where I’ll be talking about this, the next initiative that Canada will be pushing ahead, and that is getting tougher with Russian oil.

“Canada as an energy power, Alberta as an energy power, have a real voice and a real role to play in making it possible for us and the G7 to really push Russian oil out of the global market.”

Freeland wants to sell Canadian oil? Is she going to drop the moratorium on West Coast tankers?

....

Hard to deny that he is a disruptor.
 

Even the GOP Rep in Colorado Springs publicly disagreed with Trump’s proposal to move USSPACECOM to Huntsville. I’m sure he’s going to have a great reception within the party.
 
I'm curious how long the Trump/Musk relationship will remain on good terms. Neither strikes me as emotionally mature enough to totally forget this:


donald-trump-elon-musk-fued-04.jpeg
 
Back
Top