Trump might listen to him. I doubt Canadians will.Great, we have our own Great Value oligarch trying to weasel into politics through the back door.
Trump might listen to him. I doubt Canadians will.Great, we have our own Great Value oligarch trying to weasel into politics through the back door.
There is no chance this arresting a state governor, in the “States Rights are king” USA, will go wrong…Warning shot…
And Tom Homan in that appointment can’t actually arrest or issue any arrest orders.There is no chance this arresting a state governor, in the “States Rights are king” USA, will go wrong…
That’s just silly theatrics. If a governor were individually and directly harbouring an illegal alien, that would absolutely meet the elements of the offence enumerated under Title 8 U.S. Code, section 1324. It would not, however, subject them to criminal liability for being in a political leadership role in states that have legislation or regulation wherein they won’t provide any assistance at state level to certain immigration enforcement.Warning shot…
I suspect anyone who’s really jazzed about that fact that he’s now officially and unequivocally a convicted (white collar) felon was probably already well ensconced in his base anyway. Regardless, the election is behind them now and this was his last one, so it’s neither here nor there.The first Outlaw President.
That could appeal to all the people who think they've been hard done by the government in one way or another - so probably close to a majority of Americans.
Indeed it was.... The trial judge has already signalled that a very light sentence is in the cards ...
His whining aside, he is a convicted felon, convicted on the facts presented to a jury. Had his case deserved to be dismissed, the judge would have dismissed it. Had there not been a case, the prosecution would not have succesfully proven it beyond a reasonable doubt. He was given an unconditional discharge due to the impracticalities of imposing any other sentence on someone elected to be president ten days hence- not because the conviction was not valid.Indeed it was.
Donald Trump sentenced with no penalty in New York criminal trial, as judge wishes him 'Godspeed' in 2nd term
President-elect Trump was sentenced Friday after being found guilty on charges of falsifying business records stemming from Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg’s yearslong investigation.www.foxnews.comTrump can still vote after sentencing, but can't own a gun and will have to turn over DNA sample
President-elect Donald Trump doesn’t have to go to jail, pay a fine or perform community service as a result of his New York hush money conviction.apnews.comHighlights: Judge sentences Trump to 'unconditional discharge' in hush money case
Trump attends his sentencing hearing with Judge Juan Merchan following jury conviction in his hush money case.www.nbcnews.comAnd from POTUS47?Trump sentenced in New York hush-money case days before taking office
Donald Trump avoids jail time or a fine, but the US president-elect’s criminal conviction will be on his record.www.aljazeera.com
View attachment 90404
but but but lawfare!!!! wahhhhhhhhHis whining aside, he is a convicted felon, convicted on the facts presented to a jury. Had his case deserved to be dismissed, the judge would have dismissed it. Had there not been a case, the prosecution would not have succesfully proven it beyond a reasonable doubt.
I'm annoyed that a judge is allowing that to factor in. If the crime merits a certain response (swinging great fine, off to the cells, pelted with rotten fruit in the public square). then impose that response. If that means the state's enforcement apparatus has to find a chair for the USSS to sit outside a cell, and that the incoming POTUS misses the inaguration... state's acting within their jurisdiction, no? Swear Vance in.He was given an unconditional discharge due to the impracticalities of imposing any other sentence on someone elected to be president ten days hence- not because the conviction was not valid.
The US, over many years, has made their presidents more akin to absolute monarchs where it comes to criminal accountability.I'm annoyed that a judge is allowing that to factor in. If the crime merits a certain response (swinging great fine, off to the cells, pelted with rotten fruit in the public square). then impose that response. If that means the state's enforcement apparatus has to find a chair for the USSS to sit outside a cell, and that the incoming POTUS misses the inaguration... state's acting within their jurisdiction, no? Swear Vance in.
Though SCOTUS did rule that immunity doesn't precede assuming the office.The US, over many years, has made their presidents more akin to absolute monarchs where it comes to criminal accountability.
The US, over many years, has made their presidents more akin to absolute monarchs where it comes to criminal accountability.
The “overwhelming mandate” part that he still chooses to focus on kills meHis whining aside, he is a convicted felon, convicted on the facts presented to a jury. Had his case deserved to be dismissed, the judge would have dismissed it. Had there not been a case, the prosecution would not have succesfully proven it beyond a reasonable doubt. He was given an unconditional discharge due to the impracticalities of imposing any other sentence on someone elected to be president ten days hence- not because the conviction was not valid.
Hilarious that he describes the start witness as a ‘disbarred, disgraced serial perjurer’. Tell us, Mr. Trump, just how precisely did Michael Cohen end up being those things? On whose behalf was he working?
Anyway, Americans still picked this and that’s their choice. But no amount of petulant ranting on his social media platform changes what or who he is.