Likewise ‘National security’.I read they'll probably try to invoke the "moral character" aspect of denaturalization pretty loosely. Tough to quantify, easy to abuse if the courts aren't watching like a hawk.
Likewise ‘National security’.I read they'll probably try to invoke the "moral character" aspect of denaturalization pretty loosely. Tough to quantify, easy to abuse if the courts aren't watching like a hawk.
Something wrong is surely going on, but it's not incipient fascism. There are at least four big political struggles going on in the US right now: extreme left progressives vs moderates in the Democratic party (extreme left is still ascendant), neo-cons vs Trump in the Republican party (neo-cons have faded to insignificance), Democrats vs Republicans, establishment vs populists. Republican populists currently have the most control, so they are under attack by Democrats (whether extreme or moderate), neo-cons, and anyone who was vested in the pre-Trump establishment status quo for how politics and power worked in the US.Is nothing that is going on a legitimate warning bell that something wrong is going on? Lots of handwaving on your part frankly.
Fucking shame that people might have to be paid more. The proper living wage is somewhere above statutory minimum and below what the gentry want to pay their landscapers, nannies, and crop pickers. Doesn't everyone know that?And costs will inevitably rise...
Fucking shame that people might have to be paid more. The proper living wage is somewhere above statutory minimum and below what the gentry want to pay their landscapers, nannies, and crop pickers. Doesn't everyone know that?
It would also help if "populist" leaders didn't act like absolute autocrats whose ever musing and rage storm are considered to be legitimate populist policies.It would help a lot if people could recognize mere populism without trying so hard to attach it to fascism.
Boys in girls sports. Lax border controls and lenient welfare for people in the country illegally. Weak to no enforcement of some categories of crimes. Proposals to stack the USSC. Weakening of the 1A.What do you consider extreme-left policies being pushed in the USA?
Sure. These things are simultaneously true:Do you not consider any of what's happening to be overreach? Deportation to foreign countries, snatch and grabs in unmarked vans by unmarked cops on the streets, inflammatory rhetoric, threats of political arrest, etc?
Also, I reject that Trump is a populist. There is nothing remotely populare about increasing prices by initiating a global trade war with tarrifs, putting secret immigration police or the military out on the streets or cutting billionaires a cheque at the expense of the working class and their benefits.It would also help if "populist" leaders didn't act like absolute autocrats whose ever musing and rage storm are considered to be legitimate populist policies.
If we take the label fascist out of the discussion, is everything still okay with this brand of populism?
Define "okay". Mainstream Republican and Democrat government in the US includes renditions, detention away from US courts, drone assassinations, regime change, war-making without Congressional authorization. Using purely utilitarian measures, are more people in the world better off with Trump in charge?It would also help if "populist" leaders didn't act like absolute autocrats whose ever musing and rage storm are considered to be legitimate populist policies.
If we take the label fascist out of the discussion, is everything still okay with this brand of populism?
Why so strict? A few days ago a parade (a kind of circus) was good enough to be evidence of fascism.Also, I reject that Trump is a populist. There is nothing remotely populare about increasing prices by initiating a global trade war with tarrifs, putting secret immigration police or the military out on the streets or cutting billionaires a cheque at the expense of the working class and their benefits.
He hasn't even satisfied the ancient concept of panem et circenses style populism, nevermind anything remotely populist in the modern sense.
All of which are vile, but not an excusefor acting vile.Define "okay". Mainstream Republican and Democrat government in the US includes renditions, detention away from US courts, drone assassinations, regime change, war-making without Congressional authorization.
No.Using purely utilitarian measures, are more people in the world better off with Trump in charge?
Just in the global economy, the answer is a definitive no.Using purely utilitarian measures, are more people in the world better off with Trump in charge?
I would add the demise of USAID to that as well. A lot of people will be worse off, unless China or Russia steps in. Yay?Just in the global economy, the answer is a definitive no.
Additionally, Ukrainians are not better off as Trump turns a blind eye to Putin, Gazans are not better off by trump ignoring / condoning Netanyahu's actions over the last 15 days.
"people in the world" are of little to no interest to Trump - indeed neither are any Americans who are not MAGAcolytes.
Trump has deliberately turned the US' back on the world, and no longer acknowledges any responsibility to the global common.
I still don't think Trump is a Fascist.Why so strict? A few days ago a parade (a kind of circus) was good enough to be evidence of fascism.
You asked if "more people in the world better off with Trump in charge?". This was not at all modified with the idea of whether or not US has a responsibility to do so, although your question implied that it does.It's hard to measure, isn't it. He hasn't turned a country (Iraq, Libya) into a shithole at the cost of tens of thousands of lives, and most of the things being proposed as "costs" are not direct responsibilities of the US.
As I wrote, "utilitarian". Degree of responsibility is a multiplier.You asked if "more people in the world better off with Trump in charge?". This was not at all modified with the idea of whether or not US has a responsibility to do so, although your question implied that it does.
So what is the issue here?
You argued MAGA can’t be fascist without militarization. A parade was one on a list of examples for militarization, it was not held up as proof of fascism. But hey you keep fighting those strawmen.A few days ago a parade (a kind of circus) was good enough to be evidence of fascism.
Mandan is a naturalized citizen, so of course Trump has mused out loud on camera about looking into that- on his usual “a lot ofMeanwhile, in New York...
Donald Trump threatens to arrest NYC mayoral Democratic nominee Zohran Mamdani
Mamdani, the Democratic nominee for mayor of New York City and a state Assembly member, called the threat "an attack on our democracy."
![]()
Donald Trump threatens to arrest NYC mayoral Democratic nominee Zohran Mamdani
Mamdani, the Democratic nominee for mayor of New York City and a state Assembly member, called the threat "an attack on our democracy."www.usatoday.com