• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Trump administration 2024-2028

It’s actually the proper word from English common law when the concepts were phrased in Latin:
Notice the words 'strange' and 'different'

What word (for 'Alien') is used in the UK, Australia, NZ and Canada to describe the individual? Do any of these 4 countries who's legal system is based off of English Common Law use it?
 
There are no contemporary comparators to the Holocaust. But the MAGA approach to governance does compare to Nazism. It doesn’t matter that that they have not yet attained the same level of authoritarianism, ethno-nationalism, militarization, partisan subordination of courts, etc.

The fact that there there is significant rhyming in the respective consolidation of power is something that merits discussion. The fact that there has is now a substantially politicized & militarization branch of police is something that merits discussion. Mass deportations and attempts to establish concentration camps is something that merits discussion.

I understand the first step to healing is to honestly and accurately acknowledge your problem. And It is too late to call a spade a spade if you insist on waiting for it to dig the first mass grave of a Holocaust (that may or may not ever come) while watching it entrench authoritarianism.

There are a lot of bad stops on the authoritarian train before it comes to Hitler Station. We shouldn’t wait till then to get off.

If you honk like a goose and goose-step like a goose, don’t be surprised when you’re called a goose.
 
I bet we used the word 'coloured' or 'negro' back in 1950 as well.
No idea, but I do know the text of some legal documents filed in court in the 1860’s used the term ethnicus. Roughly used to convey dark skinned non -Christian people with religious status of Pagan or more likely Heathen (not fearing of the Christian God and therefore soulless and an untrustworthy witness). Very few nonwhites fell into this rather rude descriptor. This strange language was used in wills and estates until at least the Great War.
 
There are a lot of bad stops on the authoritarian train before it comes to Hitler Station. We shouldn’t wait till then to get off.

If you honk like a goose and goose-step like a goose, don’t be surprised when you’re called a goose.
And get cooked like goose.( goes up in a ball of fat fire, but still too slimy to pass as food).
 
So in the end they're back to basically where it was before Trump kicked off a trade war with the planet (actually slightly less), and more of a maximum limit that will likely not be reached now that other countries have stepped in to provide their own soybeans. Art of the deal.

Trump’s China Soybean Deal Is Less Than It Appears
EDIT: Barron's does not like the usual methods of getting around walls, at all.
 
Last edited:
So in the end they're back to basically where it was before Trump kicked off a trade war with the planet (actually slightly less), and more of a maximum limit that will likely not be reached now that other countries have stepped in to provide their own soybeans. Art of the deal.

Trump’s China Soybean Deal Is Less Than It Appears
Archive pending
And the reputational hit of being unpredictable and unreliable that will shade all future trade negotiations.
 
I've always HATED the use of the word 'Alien' in the US. Straight away its an attempt to de-humanize a person by associating anyone who is not an American is therefore an 'Alien' and thus a non-human. Its absolutely sickening.
You're probably using the wrong definition of "alien". Example: Alien and Sedition Acts (1798). Not much point getting worked up over your own editorializing.
 
There are a lot of bad stops on the authoritarian train before it comes to Hitler Station. We shouldn’t wait till then to get off.
Sure.
If you honk like a goose and goose-step like a goose, don’t be surprised when you’re called a goose.
But what they're being called is "Hitler" and "Nazi" (or close to it).

1. Big problems are most easily solved while they are still small.
2. Is there really any limit to what a person might reasonably do to "prevent Hitler"?

Taking (1) and (2) together, at what point short of "actual Hitler" does "anything goes" become legitimate? And what responsibility do people who bang the "practically Hitler" drum bear when someone who combines rage and low self-control responds to the social contagion and acts to prevent "Hitler"?
 
You're probably using the wrong definition of "alien". Example: Alien and Sedition Acts (1798). Not much point getting worked up over your own editorializing.
No
This is the term that I am referring to.

In U.S. law, an "alien" is defined as any person who is not a citizen or national of the United States, as stated in the
Immigration and Nationality Act (INA). This term refers to a foreign national and includes individuals who are in the U.S. with legal permission, such as permanent residents ("green card" holders), as well as those who are not legally authorized to be in the country.
 

The Criminal Alien Program (CAP) supports U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) Enforcement and Removal Operations (ERO) in executing its mission to protect the homeland through the arrest and removal of aliens who threaten the safety of our nation’s communities and the integrity of U.S. immigration laws. CAP focuses on the identification, arrest, and removal of Incarcerated aliens at federal, state, and local levels, as well as at-large criminal aliens.

Through CAP, ERO takes criminal aliens into custody in a controlled environment, decreasing risks to officers, aliens, and the community. When ERO directly assumes custody of a criminal through CAP, it prevents the individual from being released back into the community where they may re-offend.


This sounds like a good program to me and is exactly what I would want my government to do.


Go ICE!

So that's what those mass sweeps of factories, including a Hyundai plant, farms and neighbours are doing. I imagine the folks who are there legally, including US citizens, once they are released from detention, can be proud they are doing their part in this noble endeavour. Citizen involvement! The operations that I have seen haven't looked all that "controlled" to me.

Although they would obviously be less public, I wonder why some intrepid reporter hasn't snapped an image of a ICE bus wheeling out of a detention facility full of criminal aliens.

There is no sign extra-governmental supporters (eg. party members) are putting on quasi-military/police uniforms and rousting whomever they decide is undesirable without consequences.
Why bother when your federal agents and NG are doing that for you.
 
That is pretty much my understanding of it.
There are no contemporary comparators to the Holocaust. But the MAGA approach to governance does compare to Nazism. It doesn’t matter that that they have not yet attained the same level of authoritarianism, ethno-nationalism, militarization, partisan subordination of courts, etc.

The fact that there there is significant rhyming in the respective consolidation of power is something that merits discussion. The fact that there has is now a substantially politicized & militarization branch of police is something that merits discussion. Mass deportations and attempts to establish concentration camps is something that merits discussion.

I understand the first step to healing is to honestly and accurately acknowledge your problem. And It is too late to call a spade a spade if you insist on waiting for it to dig the first mass grave of a Holocaust (that may or may not ever come) while watching it entrench authoritarianism.
Rwandan Hutus say “ hold my beer”
 
Two federal court judges have each separately and simultaneously ruled that the Trump administration must access federal emergency contingency funding to continue SNAP (food stamp) payments to states. Even with access to this emergency funding, there's only enough to cover part of November's payments.

 
About Carney? Given Carneys behavior towards Trump yes I believe he apologized. Do you think Trump is lying about it and expects Carney not to call him out?
If Carney didn’t say anything, he will not call him out.
This ‘apology’ is directly related to Ford calling out the US Ambassador for his use of language.
What I expect is that the US Ambassador will officially apologize and it will be spun that Canada apologized first and then and only then did the US apologize.
If a face saving measure.
 
If Carney didn’t say anything, he will not call him out.
This ‘apology’ is directly related to Ford calling out the US Ambassador for his use of language.
What I expect is that the US Ambassador will officially apologize and it will be spun that Canada apologized first and then and only then did the US apologize.
If a face saving measure.
I"m not sure I follow. The article says the apology is for the ad.
 
It’s a ‘tit of tat’ move by Trump.
The US Ambassador can’t be seen to apologize first for his behaviour before the Canadians apologize for the ad.
We can however kick said ambassador out and make the point that we won’t tolerate such behaviour from a high level diplomat.

If you want to be treated with respect, sometimes you need to demand it.
 
Back
Top