Trump administration 2024-2028

[FJAG]

And is the first group or the second ultimately more corrosive to institutional reputations?

That's a good question that I don't know the answer to.

The first group is a relatively new phenomenon and its long-term impact is yet to be determined. It wouldn't be so concerning if over 70,000,000 Americans hadn't voted for Trump.

I'm not so sure about the second group either. In this case its because it is expressly a long term practice for sober, legal scholars to criticize some of the court's decisions without any general, negative impact.

The SCC has been a "partisan" court for many decades and, quite frankly, I think that some of the earlier appointments to the court are more demonstrably partisan - on either side - than some of Trump's appointments. I find Kavanaugh, Barrett and Gorsuch to be more centrist than I expected. All in all, one has to remember this has been a court with a continuous majority of conservative-appointed judges for a half a century.

 

[GK .Dundas]

From NBC article:

Oh Migawd...it ......had....onions ?
Ohh the humanity.

 

[Altair]

Trump wants NFL’s Washington Commanders to name future stadium after him

U.S. President Donald Trump wants the Washington Commanders to put his name on their future stadium, ESPN reported Saturday.

www.ctvnews.ca

U.S. President Donald Trump wants the Washington Commanders to put his name on their future stadium, ESPN reported Saturday.

A “senior White House source” told ESPN that the commander-in-chief has expressed his wishes to the NFL team’s ownership group, led by Josh Harris.

“It’s what the president wants, and it will probably happen,” the source said.

Next on the list of things only this president can say without anyone batting an eye.

 

[Czech_pivo]

Trump wants NFL’s Washington Commanders to name future stadium after him

U.S. President Donald Trump wants the Washington Commanders to put his name on their future stadium, ESPN reported Saturday.

www.ctvnews.ca

Next on the list of things only this president can say without anyone batting an eye.

Waiting to see which paper currency denomination he ‘asks’ to have his picture on. My guess is that he suggests a new 500$ bill, like the 500 Euro bill, with his face on it.

 

[Brad Sallows]

A truly egotistical person would ask to be on the most commonly circulated denomination, which is probably a 20 or maybe a 50.

 

[Czech_pivo]

A truly egotistical person would ask to be on the most commonly circulated denomination, which is probably a 20 or maybe a 50.

True, but the 500$ would be new and only him to have graced it.

 

[HavokFour]

True, but the 500$ would be new and only him to have graced it.

If they adopt polymer notes like us, he could even make it gold and glittery.

 

[GR66]

A truly egotistical person would ask to be on the most commonly circulated denomination, which is probably a 20 or maybe a 50.

A Gold Eagle coin...lasts longer in circulation. Maybe featuring a crown of Laurel leaves?

 

[lenaitch]

According to the US Treasury website, federal law prohibits the image of a living person appearing on their currency. This was apparently to avoid the appearance of a monarchy. How prescient.

So, the solution is . . .

 

[Altair]

According to the US Treasury website, federal law prohibits the image of a living person appearing on their currency. This was apparently to avoid the appearance of a monarchy. How prescient.

So, the solution is . . .

Ignore the law, do it anyways, wait for the courts to rule agaisnt him, rail agaisnt liberal radical judges regardless of who appointed them, file an emergency injunction to stay the lower court ruling, and have the SCOTUS, which is ideologically slanted his way, bend over backwards to rule in his favour.

 

[Brad Sallows]

Must be a slow day. Nothing to bitch about, so make something up...