What I'm saying is the evidence doesn't support your claim, unless "more and more likely" is along the lines of "just doubled from 0.0001% likely to 0.0002% likely". What's the likelihood that among all the people who have had access to all the documents about to be released, for several years and through a highly contentious election there was no-one who came across even tenth-of-balance-of-probability proof of kid-fucking and was willing to leak it?
Most reasonable conclusion: no proof exists that will convince anyone not already deeply invested in believing.
That doesn't preclude anyone else from suffering reputational damage. Too bad for them - it's deserved - but hard on anyone who loses a champion because they thought there could only be one kind of dirt in all that correspondence. Too bad for them, too, though, for being imprudent muck-rakers lacking all common sense. Discreditably, I find myself hoping a few of them learn a sobering lesson.
Passed and about to be signed. An excellent day. I can guess that a whole bunch of other people who think it's excellent are about to be disappointed at best, and dismayed at worst, because I doubt it will go in the direction they hope. Unless release of some stuff continues to be blocked, critics will have to move from vague speculation to trying to inflate appearances. Which they will do, but rather impotently.
