- Reaction score
- 2,170
- Points
- 1,160
Trump administration 2024-2028
- Thread starter dimsum
- Start date
- Reaction score
- 5,940
- Points
- 1,160
This is totally normal, right?
US Institute of Peace renamed for Trump after his administration gutted it earlier this year
Halifax Tar
Army.ca Legend
- Reaction score
- 16,826
- Points
- 1,260
Hubris to be sure…The left in America right now
This is some different level of trolling lol
Halifax Tar
Army.ca Legend
- Reaction score
- 16,826
- Points
- 1,260
Sure, I just cant do anything other than laugh...
Which is a very Canadian thing to do from up here. Not a swipe. Just eating the popcorn watching the dumpster fire down there as well
Altair
Army.ca Veteran
- Reaction score
- 1,317
- Points
- 1,140
This is the one I'm not scared about.
Trump can let it "expire", it just leads to yearly reviews for the next 10 years while everything continues as per normal.
Or he can start the withdrawal process, but that means undoing an act of congress, which means going through congress, which means he needs 60 votes in the senate.
Or he can hold a tantrum and try to go over congress via the SCOTUS but that will take a hell of a long time and probably not go his way.
CUSMA will limp along until a sane Republican is president or the Democrats win in 2028, at which point it will be extended and reinforced so this can never happen again....hopefully.
- Reaction score
- 7,269
- Points
- 1,360
Let the commentary begin!
Trump’s Name Is a Perfect Match for the Ridiculous US Institute of Peace Building - Washingtonian
Its dove-shaped headquarters were once merely a blight on the DC skyline. Now the building has been subsumed into Trump's ambitions to remake the capital.
washingtonian.com
Meme deleted.
Last edited by a moderator:
HavokFour
Army.ca Veteran
- Reaction score
- 1,948
- Points
- 1,040
Which would land during a midterm year, which will cause more GOP to break from the greater MAGA sooner. We're already seeing Republicans starting to act more bold in going against Trump.
Look at what just occurred in Tennessee. A ruby red district that saw a +22 point lead for Trump in 2024 has dropped to +9, again this is deep Republican territory. Now imagine how purple districts around the country are going to fair for the GOP next year.
GOP frets ‘dangerous’ result in Tennessee
EDIT: I am also seeing that the funding the GOP threw at this special election compared to what the Democrats spent was close to 3:1, and the previously mentioned last minute telerally hosted by the POTUS himself and Mike Johnson.
Last edited:
- Reaction score
- 6,063
- Points
- 1,260
All true.
The trouble is that if Trump threatens to cancel / withdraw etc, even if that is not a viable option, there will be an outcry in sectors of the Canadian commentariat who will immediately use this as proof that the Gov of the day isn't strong enough, or manly enough, or whatever Brian Lilley etc use to mischaracterise it.
Of course that will feed Trump's narrative and reinforce the otherwise untenable messaging and huffing and puffing.
Altair
Army.ca Veteran
- Reaction score
- 1,317
- Points
- 1,140
Trump, for all his faults, is really good at one thing.
Feeding the media storylines.
Of course media will run with whatever crazy thing he says, because it's good for headlines and the content writes itself. Is it true? Who cares, they get to run with it.
The only thing immune to this treatment was a the Epstein files. CUSMA isn't that sadly, and he will flood the zone about leaving, ripping it up, unfair deals, he's president, he can do what he wants, but CUSMA is structured to have all branches of government getting a say on it. Same here in Canada, Carney couldn't unilaterally rip it up either, it would need to go throught the House and the Senate.
And the one thing I hate about the US congress is the one thing that will save CUSMA. The monied class will not tolerate it going away and the monied class owns senators and house representatives.
- Reaction score
- 5,712
- Points
- 1,260
An interesting read for certain.
I am going to 'cherry pick' snippets that I believe to be of interest, there is LOTS that I've left out.
There is ALOT of information here and I have little doubt that this manifesto is already being picked apart in great detail by Anand et al. There are many flecks of 'gold' in here on Canada's path forward over the next 3+yrs. Great care to understand this and prepare for this is required. I hope that we have the right people available to make this happen.
National Security Strategy of the United States of America November 2025
The questions before us now are:
1) What should the United States want?
2) What are our available means to get it? and
3) How can we connect ends and means into a viable National Security Strategy?
1. What Do We Want Overall? First and foremost, we want the continued survival and safety of the United States as an independent, sovereign republic whose government secures the God-given natural rights of its citizens and prioritizes their well-being and interests
2. What Do We Want In and From the World? What are America’s core foreign policy interests? What do we want in and from the world?
3. What Are America’s Available Means to Get What We Want?
The Principles
President Trump’s foreign policy is pragmatic without being “pragmatist,” realistic without being “realist,” principled without being “idealistic,” muscular without being “hawkish,” and restrained without being “dovish.” It is not grounded in traditional, political ideology. It is motivated above all by what works for America—or, in two words, “America First.”
The Regions
Asia: Win the Economic Future, Prevent Military Confrontation
Lot's on Asia/China in the document, but frankly I'm not interested in it as much as I am on Canada/Western Hemisphere, so I've kept this section short
Promoting European Greatness
The Middle East: Shift Burdens, Build Peace
Same comments as with Asia
Africa
Same as before
I am going to 'cherry pick' snippets that I believe to be of interest, there is LOTS that I've left out.
There is ALOT of information here and I have little doubt that this manifesto is already being picked apart in great detail by Anand et al. There are many flecks of 'gold' in here on Canada's path forward over the next 3+yrs. Great care to understand this and prepare for this is required. I hope that we have the right people available to make this happen.
Trump national security strategy calls for ‘cultivating resistance’ in Europe and changing US’ role in Western Hemisphere
National Security Strategy of the United States of America November 2025
The questions before us now are:
1) What should the United States want?
2) What are our available means to get it? and
3) How can we connect ends and means into a viable National Security Strategy?
1. What Do We Want Overall? First and foremost, we want the continued survival and safety of the United States as an independent, sovereign republic whose government secures the God-given natural rights of its citizens and prioritizes their well-being and interests
- We want the world’s most robust, credible, and modern nuclear deterrent, plus next-generation missile defenses—including a Golden Dome for the American homeland—to protect the American people, American assets overseas, and American allies.
- Cultivating American industrial strength must become the highest priority of national economic policy.
- We want the world’s most robust, productive, and innovative energy sector—one capable not just of fueling American economic growth but of being one of America’s leading export industries in its own right
- We want to maintain the United States’ unrivaled “soft power” through which we exercise positive influence throughout the world that furthers our interests. In doing so, we will be unapologetic about our country’s past and present while respectful of other countries’ differing religions, cultures, and governing systems.
- Finally, we want the restoration and reinvigoration of American spiritual and cultural health, without which long-term security is impossible...........This cannot be accomplished without growing numbers of strong, traditional families that raise healthy children
2. What Do We Want In and From the World? What are America’s core foreign policy interests? What do we want in and from the world?
- We want to ensure that the Western Hemisphere remains reasonably stable and well-governed enough to prevent and discourage mass migration to the United States; we want a Hemisphere whose governments cooperate with us against narco-terrorists, cartels, and other transnational criminal organizations; we want a Hemisphere that remains free of hostile foreign incursion or ownership of key assets, and that supports critical supply chains; and we want to ensure our continued access to key strategic locations. In other words, we will assert and enforce a “Trump Corollary” to the Monroe Doctrine
- We want to halt and reverse the ongoing damage that foreign actors inflict on the American economy while keeping the Indo-Pacific free and open, preserving freedom of navigation in all crucial sea lanes, and maintaining secure and reliable supply chains and access to critical materials
- We want to support our allies in preserving the freedom and security of Europe, while restoring Europe’s civilizational self-confidence and Western identity;
- We want to ensure that U.S. technology and U.S. standards—particularly in AI, biotech, and quantum computing—drive the world forward
3. What Are America’s Available Means to Get What We Want?
- A still nimble political system that can course correct;
- The world’s single largest and most innovative economy........provides leverage over countries that want access to our markets;
- A broad network of alliances, with treaty allies and partners in the world’s most strategically important regions
- An enviable geography with abundant natural resources, no competing powers physically dominant in our Hemisphere, borders at no risk of military invasion, and other great powers separated by vast oceans;
- Unleashing our enormous energy production capacity as a strategic priority to fuel growth
- Reindustrializing our economy, again to further support the middle class and control our own supply chains and production capacities
The Principles
President Trump’s foreign policy is pragmatic without being “pragmatist,” realistic without being “realist,” principled without being “idealistic,” muscular without being “hawkish,” and restrained without being “dovish.” It is not grounded in traditional, political ideology. It is motivated above all by what works for America—or, in two words, “America First.”
- President Trump has cemented his legacy as The President of Peace.
- President Trump has leveraged his dealmaking ability to secure unprecedented peace in eight conflicts throughout the world over the course of just eight months of his second term. He negotiated peace between Cambodia and Thailand, Kosovo and Serbia, the DRC and Rwanda, Pakistan and India, Israel and Iran, Egypt and Ethiopia, Armenia and Azerbaijan, and ended the war in Gaza with all living hostages returned to their families
- President Trump has proven that American foreign, defense, and intelligence policies must be driven by the following basic principles:
- Focused Definition of the National Interest
- Peace Through Strength
- Predisposition to Non-Interventionism
- In the Declaration of Independence, America’s founders laid down a clear preference for non-interventionism in the affairs of other nations and made clear the basis: just as all human beings possess God-given equal natural rights, all nations are entitled by “the laws of nature and nature’s God” to a “separate and equal station” with respect to one another. For a country whose interests are as numerous and diverse as ours, rigid adherence to non-interventionism is not possible. Yet this predisposition should set a high bar for what constitutes a justified intervention.
- Flexible Realism
- We seek good relations and peaceful commercial relations with the nations of the world without imposing on them democratic or other social change that differs widely from their traditions and histories
- Primacy of Nations
- The world’s fundamental political unit is and will remain the nation-state. LOL, Trudeau would beg to disagree but he's too cozy nestled among the twin peaks of his new girlfriend to really care
- Sovereignty and Respect
- The United States will unapologetically protect our own sovereignty........attempts by foreign powers or entities to censor our discourse or curtail our citizens’ free speech rights, lobbying and influence operations that seek to steer our policies
- Balance of Power
- Pro-American Worker
- Fairness
- We will no longer tolerate, and can no longer afford, free-riding, trade imbalances,
- As we want our allies to be rich and capable, so must our allies see that it is in their interest that the United States also remain rich and capable.
- ......we expect our allies to spend far more of their national Gross Domestic Product (GDP) on their own defense, to start to make up for the enormous imbalances accrued over decades of much greater spending by the United States.
- Competence and Merit
- The Era of Mass Migration Is Over
- Protection of Core Rights and Liberties
- Burden-Sharing and Burden-Shifting
- We count among our many allies and partners dozens of wealthy, sophisticated nations that must assume primary responsibility for their regions and contribute far more to our collective defense
- .....the United States will organize a burden-sharing network, with our government as convener and supporter.
- The model will be targeted partnerships that use economic tools to align incentives, share burdens with like-minded allies, and insist on reforms that anchor long-term stability.
- The United States will stand ready to help—potentially through more favorable treatment on commercial matters, technology sharing, and defense procurement—those counties that willingly take more responsibility for security in their neighborhoods and align their export controls with ours
- Realignment Through Peace
- Economic Security
- Balanced Trade
- The United States will prioritize rebalancing our trade relations, reducing trade deficits, opposing barriers to our exports, and ending dumping and other anti-competitive practices that hurt American industries and workers. We seek fair, reciprocal trade deals with nations that want to trade with us on a basis of mutual benefit and respect. But our priorities must and will be our own workers, our own industries, and our own national security
- Securing Access to Critical Supply Chains and Materials
- .....the United States must never be dependent on any outside power for corecomponents—from raw materials to parts to finished products—necessary to the nation’s defense or economy. We must re-secure our own independent and reliable access to the goods we need to defend ourselves and preserve our way of life. This will require expanding American access to critical minerals and materials while countering predatory economic practices.
- Reindustrialization
- Reviving our Defense Industrial Base
- Energy Dominance
- ....Expanding our net energy exports will also deepen relationships with allies while curtailing the influence of adversaries
- Preserving and Growing America’s Financial Sector Dominance
- Balanced Trade
A. Western Hemisphere: The Trump Corollary to the Monroe Doctrine
- ....the United States will reassert and enforce the Monroe Doctrine to restore American preeminence in the Western Hemisphere
- .....We will enlist established friends in the Hemisphere to control migration, stop drug flows, and strengthen stability and security on land and sea
- The United States must reconsider our military presence in the Western Hemisphere. This means four obvious things:
- A readjustment of our global military presence to address urgent threats in our Hemisphere, especially the missions identified in this strategy, and away from theaters whose relative import to American national security has declined in recent decades or years;
- A more suitable Coast Guard and Navy presence to control sea lanes, to thwart illegal and other unwanted migration, to reduce human and drug trafficking, and to control key transit routes in a crisis;
- Targeted deployments to secure the border and defeat cartels, including where necessary the use of lethal force to replace the failed law enforcement-only strategy of the last several decades; and
- Establishing or expanding access in strategically important locations.
- Strengthening critical supply chains in this Hemisphere will reduce dependencies and increase American economic resilience.
- The Western Hemisphere is home to many strategic resources that America should partner with regional allies to develop, to make neighboring countries as well as our own more prosperous
- Non-Hemispheric competitors have made major inroads into our Hemisphere, both to disadvantage us economically in the present, and in ways that may harm us strategically in the future. Allowing these incursions without serious pushback is another great American strategic mistake of recent decades.
- In the Western Hemisphere—and everywhere in the world—the United States should make clear that American goods, services, and technologies are a far better buy in the long run, because they are higher quality
- The United States must also resist and reverse measures such as targeted taxation, unfair regulation, and expropriation that disadvantage U.S. businesses
Asia: Win the Economic Future, Prevent Military Confrontation
Lot's on Asia/China in the document, but frankly I'm not interested in it as much as I am on Canada/Western Hemisphere, so I've kept this section short
Promoting European Greatness
- .....larger issues facing Europe include activities of the European Union and other transnational bodies that undermine political liberty and sovereignty, migration policies that are transforming the continent and creating strife, censorship of free speech and suppression of political opposition, cratering birthrates, and loss of national identities and self-confidence.
- .....it is far from obvious whether certain European countries will have economies and militaries strong enough to remain reliable allies
- .....s lack of self-confidence is most evident in Europe’s relationship with Russia. European allies enjoy a significant hard power advantage over Russia by almost every measure, save nuclear weapons.
- It is a core interest of the United States to negotiate an expeditious cessation of hostilities in Ukraine, in order to stabilize European economies, prevent unintended escalation or expansion of the war, and reestablish strategic stability with Russia, as well as to enable the post-hostilities reconstruction of Ukraine to enable its survival as a viable state.
- The Trump Administration finds itself at odds with European officials who hold unrealistic expectations for the war perched in unstable minority governments, many of which trample on basic principles of democracy to suppress opposition. A large European majority wants peace, yet that desire is not translated into policy, in large measure because of those governments’ subversion of democratic processes
- ....we not afford to write Europe off—doing so would be self-defeating for what this strategy aims to achieve.
- America encourages its political allies in Europe to promote this revival of spirit, and the growing influence of patriotic European parties indeed gives cause for great optimism.
- America is, understandably, sentimentally attached to the European continent—and, of course, to Britain and Ireland.
- ...... it is more than plausible that within a few decades at the latest, certain NATO members will become majority non-European.
- .....Ending the perception, and preventing the reality, of NATO as a perpetually expanding alliance;
The Middle East: Shift Burdens, Build Peace
Same comments as with Asia
Africa
Same as before
Last edited:
HavokFour
Army.ca Veteran
- Reaction score
- 1,948
- Points
- 1,040
The Reagan National Defense Survey for 2025 was released on Thursday. The bipartisan support when it comes to almost all Ukraine/Europe/Nato questions (positive increases across the board from last year) for example makes you wonder what exactly people like Witkoff are doing.
cloud.3dissue.net
Issue 39
cloud.3dissue.net
GK .Dundas
Army.ca Veteran
- Reaction score
- 2,486
- Points
- 960
Investing in his financial future from all appearances.The Reagan National Defense Survey for 2025 was released on Thursday. The bipartisan support when it comes to almost all Ukraine/Europe/Nato questions (positive increases across the board from last year) for example makes you wonder what exactly people like Witkoff are doing.
Issue 39
daftandbarmy
Army.ca Fossil
- Reaction score
- 42,551
- Points
- 1,160
I love the 'God given natural rights' ploy... if you're gonna Crusade, you gotta Crusade like a boss!
GK .Dundas
Army.ca Veteran
- Reaction score
- 2,486
- Points
- 960
An LSD trip in print form.