• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Trump administration 2024-2028

Czech_pivo said:
Not good news for those in favour of Tariffs today in the US.

Trade court orders tariff refunds in setback for Trump administration​

A federal judge has cleared the way for thousands of businesses to receive refunds for tariffs that the Supreme Court struck down last month.
The US Court of International Trade on Wednesday ordered Customs and Border Protection to issue refunds for levies US President Donald Trump introduced last year under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA).
"All importers of record whose entries were subject to IEEPA duties are entitled to the benefit" from the high court's ruling, Judge Richard Eaton wrote.
The payment process remains murky. But the trade court decision marks a setback for Trump, who has moved to replace the import taxes and bemoaned the prospect of refunds.

www.bbc.com

Trade court orders tariff refunds in setback for Trump

A trade court has cleared the way for businesses to receive refunds for tariffs that the Supreme Court struck down last month.
www.bbc.com www.bbc.com


Judge Orders Government to Begin Refunding More Than $130 Billion in Tariffs​

More than 2,000 lawsuits have been filed by companies in the court seeking to recoup their money after Supreme Court invalidated tariffs last month​


Click to expand...
Good. The U.S. government took money illegally; of course they should have to give it back.
 
Czech_pivo said:
Not good news for those in favour of Tariffs today in the US.

Trade court orders tariff refunds in setback for Trump administration​

A federal judge has cleared the way for thousands of businesses to receive refunds for tariffs that the Supreme Court struck down last month.
The US Court of International Trade on Wednesday ordered Customs and Border Protection to issue refunds for levies US President Donald Trump introduced last year under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA).
"All importers of record whose entries were subject to IEEPA duties are entitled to the benefit" from the high court's ruling, Judge Richard Eaton wrote.
The payment process remains murky. But the trade court decision marks a setback for Trump, who has moved to replace the import taxes and bemoaned the prospect of refunds.

www.bbc.com

Trade court orders tariff refunds in setback for Trump

A trade court has cleared the way for businesses to receive refunds for tariffs that the Supreme Court struck down last month.
www.bbc.com www.bbc.com


Judge Orders Government to Begin Refunding More Than $130 Billion in Tariffs​

More than 2,000 lawsuits have been filed by companies in the court seeking to recoup their money after Supreme Court invalidated tariffs last month​


Click to expand...

FAFO
 
Czech_pivo said:
So many law firms in the US are rubbing their hands in delight.
Click to expand...
The trade court ordered all tariffs be repaid to everyone who paid them. That does not leave much space for further litigation unless consumers start going after retailers.
 
brihard said:
Good. The U.S. government took money illegally; of course they should have to give it back.
Click to expand...

What if a government illegally violates the rights of thousands of it's citizens? Is there any path to indemnify those harmed?
 
PrairieFella said:
Ill bite, whats the context?
Click to expand...

The illegal enactment of the EA. Granted this is irrelevant to this thread and I don't expect a tangent. Just curious if some measure exists to hold our government accountable like in the US.
 
QV said:
The illegal enactment of the EA. Granted this is irrelevant to this thread and I don't expect a tangent. Just curious if some measure exists to hold our government accountable like in the US.
Click to expand...
I’ll bite too. What action are you construing as illegal?

you as a voter have 3 actions (that I can see) available: Sue the government, complain to you member of parliament and/ or vote against the party/candidate that you believe has acted illegally.
 
QV said:
What if a government illegally violates the rights of thousands of it's citizens? Is there any path to indemnify those harmed?
Click to expand...
Various legal actions have already been filed on that, so we’ll see over the next couple years of proceedings in civil court. Generally speaking in civil matters actual harm will have to be demonstrably tied to the impugned conduct. I expect a lot of rhetoric will lump enforcement actions writ large in with the invocation of the EA, but hence in practice the vast majority of tangible action taken had nothing to do with it.

In cases where anyone was materially harmed by the invocation of the EA that was later struck down by the courts, I’m fully supportive of whatever recourse the courts order. I trust my take on this is sufficiently consistent for you?
 
QV said:
The illegal enactment of the EA. Granted this is irrelevant to this thread and I don't expect a tangent. Just curious if some measure exists to hold our government accountable like in the US.
Click to expand...
Sorry - I am confused. What measures exist right now to hold the Trump administration accountable? Note I say the Trump administration vice the USG...because he and Congress have made it clear that he is the government, and is unbound by trivialities like the Constitution.
 
QV said:
The illegal enactment of the EA. Granted this is irrelevant to this thread and I don't expect a tangent. Just curious if some measure exists to hold our government accountable like in the US.
Click to expand...

The exact same measures as in the USA exist in Canada, the courts. If you think that they are doing something illegal, you sue them and let the judges determine the outcome. And of course, there is the other remedy - elections.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top