• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Trump administration 2024-2028

For the record, playing the AI game, I asked 6 different systems: "Using open-source media and government sources, assess the 5 main (most frequently mentioned) goals of the U.S./Israel campaign against Iran" A fair bit of overlap, with a range of which ones jump out more to the AI borgs.

Key caveat: the bots skimmed what's been said/written in the info-sphere, and can't really read hearts/minds (yet, anyway).

Claude.ai
  • Permanently Eliminate Iran's Nuclear Program
  • Destroy Iran's Ballistic Missile Arsenal and Production Capacity
  • Annihilate Iran's Naval Forces and Protect the Strait of Hormuz
  • Sever Iran's Support for Regional Proxy Groups ("Axis of Resistance")
  • Regime Change / Enabling an Iranian Popular Uprising
Perplexity.ai
  • Defend Israel and U.S. forces, avoid wider war
  • Degrade Iran’s regional military and proxy network
  • Prevent Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapon
  • Preserve Israeli deterrence and freedom of action
  • Push toward regime collapse/change in Iran (Israeli goal)
ChatGPT
  • Stop an Iranian nuclear weapon
  • Cripple Iran’s missile and military strike capacity
  • Protect Israel and restore deterrence against Iran
  • Disrupt Iran’s proxy/IRGC regional network
  • Coerce or destabilize the regime sufficiently to reduce future threat generation
Duck.ai (full text also attached because it doesn't archive questions/answers)
  • Regime Change
  • Nuclear Program Elimination
  • Destruction of Missile and Naval Capabilities
  • Targeting Leadership
  • Re-establishing Deterrence Against Global Rivals
Grok
  • Prevent Iran from acquiring or developing nuclear weapons (permanent denial of a nuclear capability).
  • Destroy Iran’s ballistic missile arsenal, production facilities, launchers, and related capabilities.
  • Annihilate or destroy Iran’s navy and naval forces/infrastructure.
  • Dismantle Iran’s support for terrorist proxies and ensure they can no longer destabilize the region or attack U.S./Israeli forces.
  • Weaken or overthrow the Iranian regime (end the threat from the Ayatollah regime and create conditions for the Iranian people to take control/regain freedom).
Gemini
  • Permanent Denial of Nuclear Weapons Capability
  • Destruction of Ballistic Missile and Drone Arsenals
  • Neutralization of the Iranian Navy and Maritime Denial
  • Decapitation of Leadership and Institutional Weakening
  • Dismantling the "Axis of Resistance" (Proxy Networks)
 

Attachments

The rub lies in who gets to decide what is political indoctrination. Dudes like you and Hegseth who never went to War College or you know the Commandant of said institutions who I trust know what they are preparing students for (being GOFOs themselves).

Also, the other problem with all these fucking stories is the level of misinformation. Some random guest lecture that happens once in their months there gets folks like you spun up after it gets through the right wing grifters and your algorithm.
Even Commandants are sometimes relieved for poor judgement.

You assume an emotional burden where none exists.
 
I've never seen you once criticize this admin on any substance. So I think that "burden" is obvious.

I'm fairly sure if Trump said the sky was purple you'd be here telling us his only mistake was not saying it's Indigo.
If someone posts a valid criticism of the administration, I rarely feel a need to chime in with my agreement; and, most of what gets posted here is of no particular "substance" - it's just people venting their frustrations and spinning up oddball theories about what they imagine is going on or might happen.
 
Nothing worse than guys who served thinking they understand all of the military. Just enough knowledge to make them dangerous.
Harjit Sajan comes to mind. He was sold to the public based upon his understanding of all things military. IMHO he did much to damage the image (and probably the operation of) the CF.
 
If someone posts a valid criticism of the administration, I rarely feel a need to chime in with my agreement; and, most of what gets posted here is of no particular "substance" - it's just people venting their frustrations and spinning up oddball theories about what they imagine is going on or might happen.
A most arrogant post. Well done.
 
Back
Top