• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

U.S. destroyers deploying off N. Korea U.S.

JasonH

Full Member
Inactive
Reaction score
0
Points
210
U.S. destroyers deploying off N. Korea

Ships are first phase in Bush plan for 'missile shield'

The Associated Press / Updated: 1:44 p.m. ET Sept. 24, 2004

ABOARD THE USS CORONADO â ” In the first step toward erecting a multibillion-dollar shield to protect the United States from foreign missiles, the U.S. Navy will begin deploying state-of-the-art destroyers to patrol the waters off North Korea as early as next week.

The mission, to be conducted in the Sea of Japan by ships assigned to the Navy's 7th fleet, will help lay the foundation for a system to detect and intercept ballistic missiles launched by â Å“rogue nations.â ?

Washington hopes to complete the network over the next several years.

â Å“We are on track,â ? Vice Admiral Jonathan Greenert, commander of the 7th Fleet, told The Associated Press in an interview Wednesday aboard the USS Coronado, which is based just south of Tokyo. â Å“We will be ready to conduct the mission when assigned.â ?

'Highest priority'

The deployment will be the first in a controversial program that is high on President Bush's defense agenda. Bush cleared the way to build the system two years ago by withdrawing from the 1972 Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty, which banned ship-based missile defenses.

He said protecting America from ballistic missiles was â Å“my highest priority as commander in chief, and the highest priority of my administration.â ?

The project â ” likened to hitting a bullet with a bullet, only at three times the speed â ” is exceedingly complex, prompting many critics to argue that it will never be reliable or effective. It is also expensive, with an estimated price tag of $51 billion over the next five years.

Even so, the missile threat is hard to deny.

More than 30 nations have ballistic missiles, according to the U.S. Defense Department's Missile Defense Agency. Though exact times depend on where the launch occurs, missiles could in less than 30 minutes reach virtually anywhere within the United States.

Greenert refused to give a specific date for the first deployment from the 7th Fleet, but said a deadline of Oct. 1 â ” next Friday â ” announced by Navy Secretary Gordon England in March has not changed.

Greenert, who assumed command of the Navy's largest fleet last month, also refused to name a target for the Sea of Japan patrols.

â Å“I can't specify adversaries, but you're looking at rogue nations,â ? he said in his first interview since taking the fleet command. â Å“Take it from there.â ?

The country best fitting that description in East Asia is communist wildcard North Korea, which has missiles capable of reaching the American west coast and is believed to either already possess or be well on its way toward successfully developing nuclear weapons.

The North shocked Japan in 1998 by launching a multistage â Å“Taepodongâ ? ballistic missile over Japan's main island. Tokyo responded by beefing up its own surveillance capabilities and launching its first spy satellites in March 2003.

Deep distrust

Though Japanese Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi won a promise in 2002 from the North for a moratorium on further long-range tests, distrust runs deep.

This week, Japanese naval ships were dispatched to the waters off North Korea amid reports that Pyongyang was preparing to test launch a â Å“Nodongâ ? missile, which can reach much of Japan â ” and the more than 50,000 U.S. troops stationed there â ” in just minutes.

North Korea is believed to have at least 100 of the missiles.

Because of the North Korean threat, Japan has become the first country to agree to work with Washington on the missile defense project. It is upgrading its own destroyers and acquiring better U.S.-made interceptors â ” the ship-launched Standard Missile-3 and the ground-based Patriot Advanced Capability-3.

â Å“The Japanese are very interested in developing a missile defense,â ? Greenert said.

He said the role of the 7th Fleet destroyers will be to provide long-range search and tracking of missile activity. Eventually, data gleaned by the ships would be transmitted to Ft. Greely in Alaska and Vandenberg Air Force Base in California, where, if necessary, interceptor missiles would be launched.

But for now, tracking and monitoring are as far as the mission can go. The interceptors won't be fully deployed at the American bases until next year.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6091020/

----

Jesus, first that huge mystery explosion and now this, everything is sure to goto hell in a handbasket within the next year and a half if this keeps up. 
If the United States were to go take on North Korea which in all reality would be suicide, China would intervine and then we'd all be in a shit storm
whether we like it or not.  Hold on tight guys, because were in for one hell of a ride  :-\
 
I guess in this day and age anything can happen, but I don't believe there is anything
new or impending in the article.

The missile defense systems will occur and is a natural evolution in military development.
Its not just about the deployment of "anti-missle systems" but a whole host of information
gathering, tracking, data processing tools, responses and methods of reaction to it.  The
same political stand-offs between the N. Koreans and the US have been occuring since
the end of the Korean War and there has always been some level of US military activity
near N. Korean waters.

I agree China would come to the ultimate defence of North Korea.  Yet, the Chinese
know the North Koreans from a political point of view stir up their own trouble.  Beijing
tolerates the N. Korean government and does not necessarily support the actions
of that government. Depending on what the Chinese consider a threat to their national
security, if N. Korea purposely antagonizes the Americans the Koreans may well find themselves
on their own.  In the late 1940s and early 1950s, the Chinese and American governments
had little experience or knowledge with themselves.  Today, with economic ties
and political experience acquired over the last decades, the Chinese and American
governments are on much better terms especially with Hu Jintao's less aggressive
posture and consolidation of power.

I'd expect the American's to put pressure on N. Korea and seek to isolate them until a
change in the N. Korean government takes place leading to a better political
accomodation. 
 
Would it be at all likely that North Korea could seek to "unify" with China, rather than the south?
 
Dispite the DMZ and the tensions since the early 1950s, the Koreans remain intensely tied
to their long history.  N Korea will always seek a political and military accomodation with
China or Russia, but never a unification in my opinion.  China itself has enough internal
pressures not to ever want a physical unification with a economically depressed region
with poor infrastructure.  Given enough pressure by Russia, China, Russia, and the US,
and a change of leadership with time, I'd suspect the Koreas will unify and give
the region more stability. 
 
Well I sure hope your right about the eventual unification. I don't honestly care WHO they unite with! As long as it gets them off the USA's back and in that respect, ours. If the US ever went to war with N. Korea, I have a feeling we'd be dragged into it VERY, VERY quickly. And, it wouldn't be pretty. At all. I could only hope no Nukes are used!!!!

I do agree with the US setting up thier "Defense Shield" of advanced destroyers, but doesn't that just antagonize the whole issue abit???

Of course this defense goes hand in hand with classic American military strategy, just like the cold war and purpose of nuke launching subs - A deterrant!

I'm all for continuing in peace!

:cdn:
 
Back
Top