• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

U.S. friendly-fire pilot Schmidt loses appeal

Scoobie Newbie

Army.ca Legend
Inactive
Reaction score
1
Points
410
http://sympaticomsn.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/1090257410071_85666610?hub=topstories

The U.S. fighter pilot punished for bombing Canadian troops in Afghanistan in 2002 has lost the first round of his appeal of his punishment.

Maj. Harry Schmidt, 39, was found guilty of four counts of dereliction of duty earlier in July. He was reprimanded and ordered to forfeit $5,000 US in pay.

Lt.-Gen. Bruce Carlson, the commander of the 8th Air Force, also barred Schmidt from flying Air Force planes, but he can continue to serve in the Illinois Air National Guard.

Schmidt appealed the punishment, claiming he was made a sacrificial lamb to cover up mistakes made higher up in the chain of command. He said the reprimand was issued as a "desire to mount a public relations campaign rather than actually attempt to see justice done."

On Monday, the U.S. air force said Carlson had rejected the appeal. The case will now be forwarded to Gen. Hal Homberg, commander of the air force combat command, for a final decision. His decision is not further reviewable.

On a night in April 2002, Schmidt claimed self defence and dropped a bomb on Canadian troops engaged in a live-fire night-time training exercise near Kandahar.

The attack killed Pte. Richard Green, Pte. Nathan Smith, Cpl. Ainsworth Dyer and Sgt. Marc Leger. Eight others were injured.

Schmidt claimed he thought the gunfire was an attack by Taliban fighters. He also said his superiors never told him the Canadians would be conducting training exercises that night.

In his letter of reprimand, Carlson said Schmidt "acted shamefully" and exhibited "arrogance and a lack of flight discipline" in the bombing.

"You used the inherent right of self-defence as an excuse to wage your own war," Carlson said in his ruling.

Schmidt was originally charged with manslaughter and aggravated assault, but the charges were reduced last year to dereliction of duty.

With files from The Associated Press
 
He said the reprimand was issued as a "desire to mount a public relations campaign rather than actually attempt to see justice done."

I kind of agree with this statement. I would have thought that brig time and a dishonourable discharge would have been more adequate.
 
I don't. The guy screwed up. Disobeyed an order through a loop hole.

Appeal #1 was shot down "BUT" it was moved up the chain of command. How high is this frigging thing going to go? Is he going to appeal to the president?
 
The guy has a right to appeal, it's his democratic right. I personally think the guy should have gone to prison for a little while (5-10 yrs), but he still has the right to appeal the verdict. The system should be able to uphold a just decision, overturn a bad one, or increase/decrease the penalty if required. I don;t know what the US Military Justice System is like, but if it's even half as bad as our Criminal one, this clown might end up with a raise, promotion, and a Bronze Star. But as wrong as that obviously is, he has the right to appeal.
 
Back
Top