• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

US mission in Afghanistan extends to 2017

CougarKing

Army.ca Fixture
Inactive
Reaction score
0
Points
360
The Taliban again making gains?

NY Times

Taliban Gains Pull U.S. Units Back Into Fight in Afghanistan

KABUL, Afghanistan — Months after President Obama formally declared that the United States’ long war against the Taliban was over in Afghanistan, the American military is regularly conducting airstrikes against low-level insurgent forces and sending Special Operations troops directly into harm’s way under the guise of “training and advising.”

In justifying the continued presence of the American forces in Afghanistan, administration officials have insisted that the troops’ role is relegated to counterterrorism, defined as tracking down the remnants of Al Qaeda and other global terrorist groups, and training and advising the Afghan security forces who have assumed the bulk of the fight.

In public, officials have emphasized that the Taliban are not being targeted unless it is for “force protection” — where the insurgents were immediately threatening American forces.

(...SNIPPED)

Commenting on the continuing military operations against the Taliban, the top American commander in Afghanistan, Gen. John F. Campbell, vehemently denied accusations that he was putting troops into harm’s way just to enable more airstrikes.

He has insisted that it is within his purview to target Taliban insurgents who pose a threat not just to American or NATO troops but to any Afghan security forces. And his options on the ground were clear, he said in an interview, even if Washington’s public description of them was not.

“Washington is going to have to say what they say politically for many different audiences, and I have no issue with that,” General Campbell said. “I understand my authorities and what I have to do with Afghanistan’s forces and my forces. And if that doesn’t sell good for a media piece then, again, I can’t worry about it.”

He added: “Combat and war and transition, as you know, it’s a very complex thing. For me, it’s not black and white.”

The operations are continuing during a troubling stretch for the Afghan security forces, as the Taliban are continuing to make gains. Members of the nation’s military and police forces were killed by the insurgents at a high rate last year. And in the first three months of this year, things already appeared worse: The casualty rate rose 54 percent over the same period last year, according to one Western and one Afghan official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because the figures were not public.

(...SNIPPED)


Reuters

Taliban, Afghan negotiators unable to agree ceasefire
By Amena Bakr and Jibran Ahmad

AL-KHOR, Qatar/PESHAWAR, Pakistan(Reuters) - Taliban representatives met with Afghan political figures for a second day in Qatar on Sunday, and one participant said the two sides discussed a possible ceasefire but ultimately disagreed over the continued presence of U.S. troops in the country.

The United States and Pakistan, long-regarded by critics as sympathetic to the Afghan Taliban, both welcomed the closed-door talks aimed at ending an insurgency that has raged in Afghanistan since U.S.-backed forces drove the Taliban from power in 2001.

(...SNIPPED)
 
Casualty numbers that may have adverse affect on morale of the ANA/ANP...

Diplomat

Afghan Forces are Suffering Record Losses
Could this undermine the fighting spirit of the Afghan army and police in their battles against the Taliban?


As Afghanistan’s fighting season is heating up casualties within the Afghan National Security Forces have been mounting at record levels.

In the first 15 weeks of 2015, government casualties have increased by 70 percent, compared to the same period last year, USA Today reports. Casualties average around 330 a week, which means that the 195,000 members of the Afghan army and the 157,000 members of the police force have so far sustained almost 5,000 losses.

However, the high numbers of active duty security forces may be deceiving. “Neither the United States nor its Afghan allies truly know how many Afghan soldiers and police are available for duty or, by extension, the true nature of their operational capabilities,” a newly released report by the office of John Sopko, the special inspector general for Afghanistan reconstruction (SIGAR) emphasized (see: “Taliban Onslaught: What is Happening in Afghanistan?”).

(...SNIPPED)
 
New US casualties in Afghanistan; more Taliban infiltrators in ANA uniforms:

Reuters

U.S. troops killed in Afghanistan; Taliban grab district

Wed Aug 26, 2015

2:16pm EDT

By Mohammad Stanekzai

LASHKAR GAH, Afghanistan (Reuters) - Taliban fighters seized a district headquarters in Afghanistan's Helmand province on Monday despite repeated U.S. air strikes to repel them, adding to the insurgents' recent advances in an opium farming region near a hydroelectric dam.

Elsewhere in Helmand, two men in military uniforms opened fire in the former British base of Camp Bastion, killing two U.S. service personnel, before being shot dead themselves.

It was the second incident this year involving Afghan troops, or people wearing Afghan uniforms, shooting at foreign soldiers. No group has claimed the attack.

(...SNIPPED)
 
The Taliban gaining ground again:

Reuters

Taliban breach defenses of Kunduz city in Afghan north
Mon Sep 28, 2015 7:33am EDT

By Feroz Sultani

KUNDUZ CITY, Afghanistan (Reuters) - Taliban fighters launched a three-pronged offensive on the capital of the northern Afghan province of Kunduz on Monday, fighting their way through the main entrances to the city, burning buildings and briefly taking over a hospital.

Breaching a provincial capital marks a troubling milestone in the nearly 14-year-old insurgency, though Afghan forces this year have driven the Taliban from most territory they've gained in the warm-weather fighting season.

The assault was the second time this year that the Taliban have besieged Kunduz city, as the NATO-trained Afghan police and army fight largely without the help of foreign forces.

(...SNIPPED)
 
US/ANA retaliation against the Taliban's capture of Kunduz:

Defense News

U.S. launches second airstrike after Taliban capture Kunduz
By Jeff Schogol, Staff writer 5:12 p.m. EDT September 29, 2015

The U.S. has launched a second airstrike a day after Kunduz City fell to the Taliban.

"US forces conducted an airstrike in the vicinity of the Kunduz airport at approximately 11:30pm local time, 29 September, against individuals threatening the force," Army Col. Brian Tribus, a spokesman for U.S. Forces in Afghanistan, said in an email.

Tribus did not have any further details on the airstrike. A Twitter account purportedly belonging to the Afghan National Directorate of Security claimed that the shadow governor of Kunduz and members of the terrorist organization Lashkar-e-Taiba were killed in an airstrike coordinate by the Afghan intelligence service.
(...SNIPPED)
 
And the ANA makes progress in making sure the Taliban doesn't keep their gains:

Reuters

Afghan forces have retaken main areas of Kunduz: officials
Wed Sep 30, 2015 9:31pm EDT

By Kay Johnson

NEW DELHI (Reuters) - Afghan government forces recaptured main areas of the northern city of Kunduz from the Taliban in a large offensive in the early hours of Thursday morning, two government officials said.

Details of the operation and which areas were under government control were not immediately clear.

"Afghan security forces got control of Kunduz city from Taliban overnight after heavy fighting," Hamdullah Danishi, acting governor of Kunduz, told Reuters by telephone.

(...SNIPPED)
 
The guys that retook the city were the best of the ANA,their special forces.
 
tomahawk6 said:
The guys that retook the city were the best of the ANA,their special forces.
Did you recognize something from a picture or was this reported somewhere?
 
Here is a picture and a story.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/afghanistan/11900770/Afghan-forces-battle-Taliban-insurgents-to-retake-key-northern-city-of-Kunduz.html
 
What does the Afghan SF boast manpower wise?

Maybe the US military should have concentrated the 25 billion solely on the Afghan SF component.
 
tomahawk6 said:
The guys that retook the city were the best of the ANA,their special forces.

They have to be - they have Multicam and cool helmets!
 
A deteriorating situation?

Diplomat

Afghanistan Struggles to Contain the Taliban
The fall of Kunduz last week underscores the difficulties the Afghan National Army is having on its own.


By Daniel R. DePetris
October 05, 2015

The war in Afghanistan, nearly fourteen years in the making, is by the far the longest U.S. military engagement in the nation’s history. The campaign against the Afghan Taliban, Al-Qaeda, the Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan, and the Haqqani Network will outlast two U.S. presidential administrations and is very likely to continue even after the U.S. and the NATO coalition withdraw the remainder of their troops, due by the end of 2016. And yet, despite hundreds of billions of dollars in wartime spending, several emergency supplemental bills passed by the U.S. Congress, 2,364 U.S. troops killed in action and tens of thousands of additional troops having sustained serious wartime injuries, Afghanistan is still very much a country at war.

This reality was made very much clear last week when the Taliban took Kunduz, a key city in northern Afghanistan. Afghan government forces have since taken back control of most of the city, but the fact that it fell to the Taliban was a shock.

It should not have been: The Taliban – a movement that takes advantage of the Afghan government’s weaknesses by appealing to a small segment of the Afghan population –remains dynamic and adaptive in its recruitment and its tactics on the battlefield. Vast segments of the Afghan countryside, far away from the population centers that are safeguarded by the Afghan national security forces, are either in de-facto control of Taliban elements or susceptible to Taliban influence. Those same remote areas of the Afghan countryside also happen to primary recruiting and training grounds for other militant groups who are seeking to overthrow the government of President Ashraf Ghani — including a publicized camp administered by a contingent of the Islamic State in Logar province.

(...SNIPPED)

Plus, here's more military aid arriving in Afghanistan from the US:

Diplomat

Afghanistan’s Army to Receive More Armored Vehicles to Battle Taliban
The ANA is to receive 55 additional Commando Select Armored Security Vehicles by February 2016.


By Franz-Stefan Gady
October 05, 2015

The United States is rushing additional military hardware to Afghanistan to support the embattled Afghan National Army. According to IHS Jane’s Defense Weekly, the U.S.-based defense contractor Textron Marine & Land Systems has been awarded a $56.2 million contract for the delivery of 55 additional Commando Select Armored Security Vehicles by February 2016.

“Vehicle deliveries are to begin in October and finish by February 2016, and the platforms include 36 with Objective Gunner Protection Kits, 15 with enclosed 40 mm/.50-calibre turrets, and four ambulance variants,” the article notes.

The Afghan National Army (ANA) already operates 623 Commando Select wheeled armored cars, although it is unclear how many of them are functional. More heavily armored and more heavily armed than the ANA’s Humvees, the Commando Select is considered to be the backbone of the Afghan government’s ground forces in Afghanistan.

(...SNIPPED)
 
The Textron Commando is the backbone of the ANA?  It is only in the few Mobile Strike Force Kandaks. 
 
More US troops to go back then?

Defense News

Gen. John Campbell: US Drawdown Plans in Afghanistan May Need Revising
1:08 p.m. EDT October 6, 2015
WASHINGTON — The top US commander in Afghanistan says he has provided the White House with "courses of action" that would keep more American forces there in 2016 and beyond, and said current plans to shrink the US presence there need revising.

Army Gen. John Campbell told the Senate Armed Services Committee on Tuesday he has submitted to President Barack Obama "options above and beyond" current plans to draw down to an Embassy-based force by the end of 2016 – potentially ending Obama's plans bring home nearly all US troops before he leaves office.

"It was envisioned in mid-2014 that we would transition to a normalized Embassy presence by 2017," Campbell said. "Since that time, much has changed: We've seen a rise in Daesh, an increased al-Qaida presence in Afghanistan, and now we have strong partner in [Afghan President Ashraf Ghani and Abdullah Abdullah, the chief executive officer of Afghanistan]."
(...SNIPPED)
 
No,the US wont drawdown as quickly as has been announced thus keeping enough forces in theater to back stop the ANA.
 
Is the ANA doomed to the same fate as the ARVN in the Vietnam War at the rate this Afghan campaign is going?

Reuters

Taliban threaten second Afghan provincial capital as insurgency spreads
Mon Oct 12, 2015 8:00am EDT

By Hamid Shalizi

KABUL (Reuters) - Fighting intensified around the Afghan city of Ghazni on Monday, as Taliban militants threatened to seize a second provincial capital after briefly occupying Kunduz in the north last month.

The clashes around Ghazni, some 130 km (80 miles) southwest of Kabul, underlined the worsening security situation across Afghanistan, where national soldiers and police are struggling to cope now the bulk of foreign forces have withdrawn.

Monday's violence followed days of sporadic fighting near Ghazni, and prompted most shops, schools and universities there to close.

(...SNIPPED)
 
It's almost like we left too soon, and they're not ready to fight....
 
Back
Top