• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

US Presidential Election 2024 - Trump vs Harris - Vote Hard with a Vengence

Status
Not open for further replies.
dimsum said:
Or, that the US has become so polarized that the corporate/editorial board decided not to endorse anyone at all.

Did they retract any stories? Will they change their slant in the next two weeks? Those would be better indicators.
Click to expand...
"Decided" can be a ... multi-layered term in some situations :)
www.theguardian.com

Furor over Washington Post’s decision to not endorse presidential candidate: ‘stab in the back’, ‘dying in darkness’

Employees outraged at ‘chicken-shit’ move that breaks 30-year precedent, alleging Jeff Bezos quashed Harris support
www.theguardian.com www.theguardian.com
www.theverge.com

Bezos reportedly killed the Washington Post’s Kamala Harris endorsement

Democracy dies in darkness!
www.theverge.com www.theverge.com
 
KevinB said:
Well given Russian links to him, and some of the money he borrowed to acquire Twitter, I see no reason to doubt it, as well as a slew of different articles and leaks from the Intelligence Community

Well I originally called him a South African Nazi that you took issue with and @Lumber offered a maybe more accurate description.

So we have laws about talking to foreign governments as a private citizen or a company -- It is specifically forbidden, Trump still does it - but I mean par for the course for a convicted felon right?




More than sanctions - we have actual laws that forbid that -- as well as the fact he holds a US DoD Security Clearance - I guess he takes his guidance for ignoring that from Trump too.

Russia being under sanction and the fact we have three other laws on the books that forbid it?

The fact that Twitter took on propagating Russian Disinformation is not a good look.


Then they should be charged too. If Trump's DoJ didn't that is not a reason that others can conduct illegal activity too...
Click to expand...
So, you're condemning him on speculation then. I figured people would've learned their lesson the last few time the democrats falsely called foul about Russia, Russia, Russia.

You mean twitter propogating FBI and DOJ misinformation, literally acting as their propoganda machine and following their direction, about the laptop and censoring republican opinion from the platform and calling it russian disinfomation.

X is not the same company. It was X that outed the illegal activity of the governments three letter agencies and their subversion of the rule of law against the American people.

Keep digging. I want to learn more.
 
The Bread Guy said:
"Decided" can be a ... multi-layered term in some situations :)
www.theguardian.com

Furor over Washington Post’s decision to not endorse presidential candidate: ‘stab in the back’, ‘dying in darkness’

Employees outraged at ‘chicken-shit’ move that breaks 30-year precedent, alleging Jeff Bezos quashed Harris support
www.theguardian.com www.theguardian.com
www.theverge.com

Bezos reportedly killed the Washington Post’s Kamala Harris endorsement

Democracy dies in darkness!
www.theverge.com www.theverge.com
Click to expand...
It's his newspaper. He can decide to take it wherever he wants. As for the detractors, they can also do what they want. Like not purchase the paper or find new jobs, if they feel aggrieved with their boss' decision.
 
Fishbone Jones said:
It's his newspaper. He can decide to take it wherever he wants. As for the detractors, they can also do what they want. Like not purchase the paper or find new jobs, if they feel aggrieved with their boss' decision.
Click to expand...
Definitely.

But, if said owners decide not to support a candidate over their employees’ protestations, then it’s not so much that said employees’ previous works on the subject were wrong. It’s that the owners disagree with it or want to appear politically neutral in that sense.

As I said - a better indicator would be if those papers retract their pieces supporting Harris.
 
Last edited:
Not sure why anyone is offended that Trump is compared to Hitler. It's not like it stops Democrats from talking to him at public events, or touting past productive political engagements. The obvious explanation is that those people don't take the rhetoric seriously. If some prominent Democrats don't take it seriously, why would their peers think voters would take it seriously?
 
On another subject, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence has put out a statement accusing Russia of disseminating a false video purporting to portray Trump mail-in ballots being destroyed in Pennsylvania.

Joint ODNI, FBI, and CISA Statement

Joomla! - the dynamic portal engine and content management system
www.dni.gov www.dni.gov
 
Brad Sallows said:
Not sure why anyone is offended that Trump is compared to Hitler. It's not like it stops Democrats from talking to him at public events, or touting past productive political engagements. The obvious explanation is that those people don't take the rhetoric seriously. If some prominent Democrats don't take it seriously, why would their peers think voters would take it seriously?
Click to expand...
It shouldn't surprise anyone, it's the democrat default position when they're getting their asses waxed.
 
dimsum said:
Definitely.

But, if said owners decide not to support a candidate over their employees’ protestations, then it’s not so much that said employees’ previous works on the subject were wrong. It’s that the owners disagree with it or want to appear politically neutral in that sense.

As I said - a better indicator would be if those papers retract their pieces supporting Harris.
Click to expand...
True, but in the end " It's my newspaper, I'll decide what we publish." Ham fisted or not, that's the bottom line
 
Retired AF Guy said:
Oh come on, yes you do.

From Obama's DNC Convention Speech (Right at the beginning):

Click to expand...
The dems only wish Harris could pull 20% of his crowds. They bitch because it drives them crazy that so many people would turn out to listen to him.

And truthfully, if he's able to draw crowds like he does, I can't blame him for crowing about it.
 
brihard said:
On another subject, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence has put out a statement accusing Russia of disseminating a false video purporting to portray Trump mail-in ballots being destroyed in Pennsylvania.

Joint ODNI, FBI, and CISA Statement

Joomla! - the dynamic portal engine and content management system
www.dni.gov www.dni.gov
Click to expand...
Following up on this...

Are sure this is Russia disseminating a false video of bail-in ballots being destroyed?

Or is it an authentic video that somehow was made public, and now the Dems are scrambling to distance themselves from it hy accusing Russia?

Russia is an easy boogeyman to blame all kinds of things on, same goes for China...


(I haven't clicked the link yet, rushing ticket ready for work. I'll check it out once home!)
 
CBH99 said:
Following up on this...

Are sure this is Russia disseminating a false video of bail-in ballots being destroyed?

Or is it an authentic video that somehow was made public, and now the Dems are scrambling to distance themselves from it hy accusing Russia?

Russia is an easy boogeyman to blame all kinds of things on, same goes for China...


(I haven't clicked the link yet, rushing ticket ready for work. I'll check it out once home!)
Click to expand...

The statement is 150 words. Your post is 76. Surely we should be able to at least read the source material as a reasonable price of admission for intelligent discussion on this website before posting our favourite conspiracy theories?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

dimsum
Trump administration 2024-2028
94 95 96
Replies
2K
Views
76K
QV
QV
Blackadder1916
Effect of Rowe v. Wade reversal in the US Military.
2
Replies
27
Views
29K
lenaitch
lenaitch
daftandbarmy
    • Like
The Management Myth
Replies
11
Views
18K
Brad Sallows
Brad Sallows
Retired AF Guy
Rona Ambrose next Canadian Ambassador to US?
Replies
11
Views
12K
Spencer100
Spencer100
daftandbarmy
    • Like
The Pity of War - Is leading one’s own troops to slaughter ever justified?
Replies
1
Views
15K
Weinie
Weinie
Back
Top