• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

US Presidential Election 2024 - Trump vs Harris - Vote Hard with a Vengence

Status
Not open for further replies.
proof that not all Arabs and Muslims support Hamas and Hezbollah I guess
Considering that the Muslims and Arabs who are upset with the Dems are upset because they consider the Dems insufficiently Team Hamas and too Zionist. So they are going to punish the Dems by voting Republican…


Seems Legit Martin Freeman GIF
 
Is that a thing, you cant wear a political shirt to vote ? Is that a thing in Canada ?

Also the the Rogan Trump podcast was a technical error on YouTube. JR posted about it all ready. No conspiracy just some 1s and 0s went awry.
Yep. I once saw someone in the line asked to remove a button they had on their shirt.
 
I listened to most of his book (I got sidetracked when James S.A. Corey’s new book came out). This line is particularly good.

I had to look that up. Some interesting trends mentioned here...

Voting patterns in the 2022 elections​



In the 2022 midterm elections, there were familiar patterns in voting preferences among subgroups. Younger voters, Black voters and those living in urban areas continued to support Democratic candidates while older, White and rural voters backed Republicans.

But the GOP improved its performance in 2022 across most voting subgroups relative to 2018 – due almost entirely to differential partisan turnout. Voters who were more favorable to Republican candidates turned out at higher rates compared with those who typically support Democrats. Shifting preferences among individual voters – though likely consequential in some races – was a much smaller factor in the 2022 midterms compared with turnout.

Gender, race and the 2022 vote​

Overall, the gender gap in 2022 vote preferences was roughly similar to the gaps in 2020 and 2018. And even as men continued to be more likely than women to favor GOP candidates, Republicans improved their performance among both groups compared with 2018.

In 2018, men were roughly evenly divided between Democratic and Republican candidates. In the 2022 midterms, 54% of men cast ballots for GOP candidates, while 44% preferred Democrats. Republicans also gained support from a higher share of women compared with previous elections: 48% of women voters cast ballots for GOP candidates in 2022 while 51% favored Democrats. In 2018, 40% voted for Republicans while 58% supported Democrats. These shifts in margins largely reflect differential turnout, rather than shifting preferences.

As in previous elections, White voters continued to favor GOP candidates. In the 2022 midterms, 57% of White voters cast ballots for GOP candidates compared with 41% who supported Democrats. This 16 percentage point difference is about as wide as it was in 2020 (12 points) and wider than in 2018 (6 points). These changes also are largely attributable to turnout differences.

The gender gap among White voters in 2022 was similar to the gap in 2018. Republicans fared better among both White men and White women in 2022 compared with four years prior.

 
The ongoing voter realignment is old news. Ruy Teixeira has been sounding the alarm to Democrats about it for at least a year. "Where Have All the Democrats Gone?" was published almost a year ago.

Teixeira writes at Liberal Patriot.
 
Correct, but in determining whether or not an action is an official action, they are very limited in what evidence they can bring forward.
Sure, but everyone who thinks there's too much antagonism in politics should stop producing and promulgating ridiculously inflammatory scenarios. Right now it looks to me like the median politically engaged Democrat wants to throw gasoline on the fire.
 
I thought you didn’t trust polls?


If one of those “faceless people” wasn’t JD Vance on X (which you can still look up), sure.


I await your comments on Trump’s flip-flop on early voting though.
I don't, but I know posting pro Trump stuff drives people like you crazy.😉

JD's comment doesn't figure into the initial comment, but whatever floats your boat.

His 'flip flop' is also immaterial. People know Trump. People know how he talks and weaves. It's only a flip flop to you and others of your ilk. Nobody else really cares. They really, really don't.

But if you want to discuss flip flops you can start with Harris and Walz.
 
Is that a thing, you cant wear a political shirt to vote ? Is that a thing in Canada ?

Also the the Rogan Trump podcast was a technical error on YouTube. JR posted about it all ready. No conspiracy just some 1s and 0s went awry.
So there actually was a problem after all? Too bad for all the technical experts and their dog piles.😂
 
So it appears a phony photo has been circulated to add credence to harris' claim. I wonder if the harris campaign will disavow it?


FACT CHECK: Does This Photo Show Kamala Harris in McDonald's Uniform?​

Why would a campaign be responsible to disavow fabricated material they have nothing to do with? Setting that up as an expectation would mean anyone could photoshop anything and it would be the responsibility of the campaign to dignify it with acknowledgment and disavowal. That would be a dumb expectation to impose on any campaign
 
Why would a campaign be responsible to disavow fabricated material they have nothing to do with? Setting that up as an expectation would mean anyone could photoshop anything and it would be the responsibility of the campaign to dignify it with acknowledgment and disavowal. That would be a dumb expectation to impose on any campaign
I never claimed whatever you're saying. I was simply wondering. You answered. Don't get excited.
 
Is that a thing, you cant wear a political shirt to vote ? Is that a thing in Canada ?

Also the the Rogan Trump podcast was a technical error on YouTube. JR posted about it all ready. No conspiracy just some 1s and 0s went awry.
I asked my AI search engine the following question: Is it illegal to wear political attire at US polling stations?

Wearing Political Attire at Polling Stations

Based on the provided search results, the legality of wearing political attire at US polling stations varies from state to state. Here’s a summary:

New York: According to the New York State Board of Elections, voters are not allowed to wear campaign buttons, hats, or T-shirts with candidates’ names (e.g., Donald Trump or Kamala Harris) within 100 feet of a polling place. However, it is permissible to wear apparel or buttons with messages about general political issues or viewpoints (e.g., marriage equality, 2nd Amendment, MAGA).

Texas: Under Texas election law, wearing certain political apparel at or near a polling place is illegal. Voters are prohibited from displaying political signs, literature, or clothing featuring candidate names or political parties within 100 feet of a polling place. Refusal to comply can result in a Class C misdemeanor and a $500 fine.

Other States: In 21 states, voters are prohibited from wearing political attire, including candidate names, political parties, or ballot issues, within a certain distance of a polling place during in-person voting. The remaining states and Washington, D.C. do not have specific guidelines on what constitutes political attire or prohibit campaign materials, signs, banners, or literature within or near polling places.

In summary, while there is no federal law prohibiting political attire at polling stations, individual states have varying regulations. New York allows some political expression, while Texas prohibits certain types of political apparel. In 21 other states, voters are restricted from wearing political attire within a certain distance of a polling place. It is essential to familiarize yourself with the specific laws and regulations in your state before voting.


I asked the same question about Canadian polling stations and got the following answer:

Wearing Political Attire at Polls

Based on the provided search results, there is no explicit information specifically addressing Canadian polling stations. The search results primarily focus on US states’ electioneering laws and polling place restrictions.

However, it is essential to note that Canadian electoral law and polling place regulations differ from those in the United States. In Canada, political parties’ representatives are allowed to be present at polling stations, but there is no mention of restrictions on voters wearing political attire.


However, the Wikipedia page on Passive Electioneering has the following for Canada:

Canada

While Canadian electoral law allows representatives of the political parties to be present in polling stations, nobody present at the polling station is permitted to wear or carry anything identifying themselves as a member of a political party or supporter or opponent of any political cause. This claim needs references to reliable sources. an officials are also not permitted to campaign immediately in front of a polling station, nor may anyone bring any campaign literature into the station .

The equipment used by polling staff has to meet strict colour criteria. Staff may be refused work if their clothing is of a "partisan colour."
 
While looking for references to the “red mirage” effect I found this article that eerily predicted some of what aholend lat time.


And some discussion now about if that is likely again.

 
I asked my AI search engine the following question:
WHOA!
Never trust the AI Search Engine. I once did a Search for the Counties of Prince Edward Island, and the AI generated answer had so many contradictory facts in it, it was a farce. It listed the largest county as having the smallest land mass of the three. It listed the counties from East to West, backwards. It was worse than using Wikipedia as a source.
 
Currently watching the MSG rally.

The NYPD CoP has estimated 19,000 inside and 5,000 outside, so far. No protests on site.
 
WHOA!
Never trust the AI Search Engine. I once did a Search for the Counties of Prince Edward Island, and the AI generated answer had so many contradictory facts in it, it was a farce. It listed the largest county as having the smallest land mass of the three. It listed the counties from East to West, backwards. It was worse than using Wikipedia as a source.
It depends on who owns the platform and who programs it.
 
WHOA!
Never trust the AI Search Engine. I once did a Search for the Counties of Prince Edward Island, and the AI generated answer had so many contradictory facts in it, it was a farce. It listed the largest county as having the smallest land mass of the three. It listed the counties from East to West, backwards. It was worse than using Wikipedia as a source.
Interesting. The one I used is a feature of my Brave browser. I will check that out. Thanks!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top