• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Trump administration 2024-2028

I guess it is time to find some new facts then
Some correct and verifiable ones, at least, preferably reported according to universally applied criteria. Not enough information driving public policy is subjected to the rigour of scientific method (ie. independent review and verification). This is natural - people like to do new things, not go over someone else's work. Governance is too important for that.
 
As a change up from a satire site, there is this non-partisan source, with a wide range of supporters from across the political spectrum.

Council on Criminal Justice

To build on Brad's point, note that many cities report no homicides, or no violent crimes etc which seems a little unlikely....the issue seems to be self-reporting, as captured in Annex A of the report
 
Then why didn't you write that rather than apparently repeating some random, unattributed (and incorrect) comment. Were you trying to sound almost "presidential" or just emulating the practice of not bothering about facts?

Keep yelling at the clouds while searching high and low for fly shit in pepper, nobody cares.
 
Significant difference between the actual chief and a subordinate.
The bones of the issue was whether it happened or not, rather than whodunnit.

"I'm going to ignore/deprecate the foundational point of your evidence because you got this detail wrong."
 
The bones of the issue was whether it happened or not, rather than whodunnit.

"I'm going to ignore/deprecate the foundational point of your evidence because you got this detail wrong."
Who took the action is foundational, not a mere detail.
 
No, no, pretty sure that a Cpl in the tool crib at Cold Lake has the same authorities as the CDS.
Significant difference between the actual chief and a subordinate.

It actually happened. Data was manipulated to represent lower crime and published as such. It doesn't matter if it was the chief or an inspector or the clerk. It occurred and there was an outcome.

You two really having trouble with that concept?
 
It actually happened. Data was manipulated to represent lower crime and published as such. It doesn't matter if it was the chief or an inspector or the clerk. It occurred and there was an outcome.

You two really having trouble with that concept?
The concept that the chief, on being informed of the issue, addressed it?
 
It actually happened. Data was manipulated to represent lower crime and published as such. It doesn't matter if it was the chief or an inspector or the clerk. It occurred and there was an outcome.

You two really having trouble with that concept?
Not at all. You seem to have difficulty accepting the concept you were wrong.
 
  • Humorous
Reactions: QV
Back
Top