I say again that the proposal is to put an American civilian in charge of the UN peacekeeping department that reports to the Secretary General and controls operations authorized by the Security Council. Read the paragraph about the US being willing to give up its control of another important department. In my opinion, the headline and parts of the story are crafted to place the proposal to try to instill some competence into the peacekeeping process in the worst possible light.
For example, if the US was planning to do this in order to get out of Iraq by replacing its troops with UN forces, how does it get around the right of nations to decide if they are going to contribute troops to a mission or not, and to place caveats on their employment and rules of engagement? In the words of a certain Ottawa talk show host, it is time that we all gave our heads a shake. (Rant generator off)