• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

World War Two finally comes to an end on 29 Dec 2006

vonGarvin

Army.ca Legend
Subscriber
Reaction score
1,300
Points
1,040
Well, not the war, but the UK's payment to Canada and the United States:
Britain to pay back last WW2 loans
LONDON, England (Reuters) -- Britain said it will on Friday pay back the final installments of loans taken out at the end of World War Two to finance vital reconstruction.
The payments of $83.25 million to the United States and $22.7 million to Canada will close the final chapter of the war and mean that in total the country has paid close to twice what it borrowed in 1945 and 1946.
"This week we finally honor in full our commitments to the U.S. and Canada for the support they gave us 60 years ago," Treasury minister Ed Balls said on Thursday.
"It was vital support which helped Britain defeat Nazi Germany and secure peace and prosperity in the post-war period. We honor our commitments to them now as they honored their commitments to us all those years ago," he added.
Britain borrowed a total of $4.3 billion from the United States in 1945, followed in 1946 by a loan of $1.2 billion from Canada -- both at an interest rate of just two percent.
During World War Two, the United States effectively gave Britain billions of dollars worth of goods under the lend-lease program.
But that abruptly ended in September 1945 despite the fact Britain was on its knees economically after six years of warfare.
Despite the heavily discounted rate of interest on the loans, in the intervening years Britain has failed to make any payments on six occasions because of balance of payments problems -- in 1956, 1957, 1964, 1965, 1968 and 1976.
To date the country has paid a total of $7.5 billion to the United States and $2 billion to Canada.
The Treasury noted that there were still World War One debts owed to and by Britain, but that no action had been taken on either count since U.S. President Herbert Hoover declared a moratorium in 1931 during the Great Depression.

Source:  http://edition.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/europe/12/29/britain.warloans.reut/index.html
 
[rant]
We'd win it if we put 1/10th the effort into this war that we put into the last.  And no, I don't mean men, women and bullets.  I mean NATIONAL effort.

[/rant]

:D
 
Hauptmann Scharlachrot said:
[rant]
We'd win it if we put 1/10th the effort into this war that we put into the last.  And no, I don't mean men, women and bullets.  I mean NATIONAL effort.

[/rant]

:D
+1 Garvin! err, I mean, Hauptmann Scharlachrot  :D
 
Michael Baker said:
+1 Garvin! err, I mean, Hauptmann Scharlachrot  :D
Garvin?  That ass?  How DARE you compare me to him!
 
Hauptmann Scharlachrot said:
Garvin?  That ***?  How DARE you compare me to him!
I feel free to do what I want to do, just as Infanteer has done here http://forums.army.ca/forums/threads/55183.45.html  ;)
 
Good news, what most people do not know is that Britain entered WW2 still in dept from WW1 so
it was basically fighting the war on credit. After the war ended the ungratfull b§&?$stards voted
Winnie C out of power and put the Socialists in power they then nationalized everything in sight
from steel industry to , believe it or not, the trucking industry:. this led to the demise of British
industry and the end of Britain as a world power.This also the led to the rise of an allpowerfull
labour union movement that held the country in its evil grip until Maggie Thatcher took them on and
smashed them.This lead to thousands of Brit.exservicemen finding themselves worse off than they were before the war
and a large number of them,my parents included thank God,left for Australia,Canada,and New Zeeland.
    So what does this extra money mean to Britain? basically nothing ,it will be spent on the National
Health Scheme,socialism is too deeply entrenched to change and Britain will continue on its inevitable
downward spiral.
    Excuse the rant but it seemed like a good opertunity to get it off my chest. 
                      Regards



 
time expired said:
Good news, what most people do not know is that Britain entered WW2 still in dept from WW1 so
it was basically fighting the war on credit. After the war ended the ungratfull b§&?$stards voted
Winnie C out of power and put the Socialists in power they then nationalized everything in sight
from steel industry to , believe it or not, the trucking industry:. this led to the demise of British
industry and the end of Britain as a world power.This also the led to the rise of an allpowerfull
labour union movement that held the country in its evil grip until Maggie Thatcher took them on and
smashed them.This lead to thousands of Brit.exservicemen finding themselves worse off than they were before the war
and a large number of them,my parents included thank God,left for Australia,Canada,and New Zeeland.
    So what does this extra money mean to Britain? basically nothing ,it will be spent on the National
Health Scheme,socialism is too deeply entrenched to change and Britain will continue on its inevitable
downward spiral.
    Excuse the rant but it seemed like a good opertunity to get it off my chest. 
                       Regards

But as you will remember Winston Chirchill did become a peactime priminister he won the next election or the one after.
 
Am I the only one who finds it ironic (to say the least) that Great Britain went to war to defeat a National Socialist nation(Germany) and then, promptly after winning that war, went nationalist on everything under socialist programs?
 
HAUPTMAN S
Am I to assume this is a play on words?.
                    Regards
 
time expired said:
HAUPTMAN S
Am I to assume this is a play on words?.
                     Regards
I never play.
And it's "Hauptmann", not "Hauptman".

(PS: "Hauptmann Scharlachrot" is German for "Captain Scarlet")
 
Hauptmann Scharlachrot
                                Much as I detest socialists I would not go so far as to compare British
socialism with Hitlers national socialism.While many NSDAP programs had a thin veneer of
socialism they were mainly aimed at taking the wind out of the sails of  the communist led labour unions,
and did not in anyway detract Hitler from his main facist aims . The British Labour partys aims
where more on the lines of the Communist party s programs, to eliminate the upper classes by
nationalising all production and transport facilities,not good but still better than shooting them
all. This effectivly stopped all investment to industry as the government was broke and no one
else was interested in investing in nationalised industries. Some industries never recovered,auto,
coal ,steel and others are still suffering ,railways for example.
                            Regards
 
Actually, WW 2 isn't quite over as Russia and Japan still haven't signed a formal peace treaty due to the ongoing dispute over the Kurils/Northern Territories...

 
Hauptmann Scharlachrot said:
[rant]
We'd win it if we put 1/10th the effort into this war that we put into the last.  And no, I don't mean men, women and bullets.  I mean NATIONAL effort.

[/rant]

:D

The last war? You mean the Kosovo air campaign? Somalia? Or Gulf War One? (I list all 3 since some people may not consider the first two to be "wars" so much as police actions or some BS...but I do consider them wars)

I should note that I really do know what you mean (WWII) and that I was just being a bit of grammer Nazi, since the last means the most recent, and WWII is not that.

 
rz350 said:
The last war? You mean the Kosovo air campaign? Somalia? Or Gulf War One? (I list all 3 since some people may not consider the first two to be "wars" so much as police actions or some BS...but I do consider them wars)

I should note that I really do know what you mean (WWII) and that I was just being a bit of grammer Nazi, since the last means the most recent, and WWII is not that.
Kosovo: air campaign, not a declared war.
Somalia: peace enforcement mission, not a declared war.
Gulf war one: not a declared war.
So, I'll amend my earlier post to read: the last war in which Canada participated as a declared belligerent.

How's that for pedantic?  ;)

(and of course I'm sure you meant "grammar" nazi)  ;)

 
Hauptmann Scharlachrot said:
Kosovo: air campaign, not a declared war.
Somalia: peace enforcement mission, not a declared war.
Gulf war one: not a declared war.
So, I'll amend my earlier post to read: the last war in which Canada participated as a declared belligerent.

How's that for pedantic?  ;)

(and of course I'm sure you meant "grammar" nazi)  ;)

But since we did not recognize the Taliban as the government of Afghanistan, does that make it a war either? (And the war on terror is a not declared, legal war, as its not against a Nation State entity at all)...and now I'm just having fun. But I do get the spirit of your post, and I damnwell agree.
 
Back
Top