- Reaction score
- 10,106
- Points
- 1,160
What does this mean for someone who hasn't watched Wolf of Wallstreet?If you have it close where its at right now, at 3:07pm, the Dow at -496 and the NASDAQ at -478 points
What does this mean for someone who hasn't watched Wolf of Wallstreet?If you have it close where its at right now, at 3:07pm, the Dow at -496 and the NASDAQ at -478 points
So when Trump says he will use "economic force" to annex Canada, he's just funnin', being misquoted or taken out of context?
And when Poilievre pushes back against the annexation claim, he's not scaremongering?
I'm confused.
Lol - well, first off all that stuff Jordan Belfort did (not the illegal stuff but the hookers, strippers, Dwarf tossing) I was too young to be lucky enough to experience.....What does this mean for someone who hasn't watched Wolf of Wallstreet?
The fact that Trump has agreed to a months reprieve with Mexico and not Canada shows just how utterly bullshit the claim is that this has to do with fentanyl coming in. It’s such a complete lie.
Just breaking: A one month reprieve on Canada as well, to April 2nd. Not sure if is CUSMA trade only or across the board.
Then in a month he will come up with another reason to put them back on.
Just breaking: A one month reprieve on Canada as well, to April 2nd. Not sure if is CUSMA trade only or across the board.
So when Trump says he will use "economic force" to annex Canada, he's just funnin', being misquoted or taken out of context?
And when Poilievre pushes back against the annexation claim, he's not scaremongering?
I'm confused.
Trump is trying to save US industry because this policy is such a massive disaster, but the elevated level of uncertainty is not going to change. Just the uncertainty and the threat of tariffs alone can spark a recession, which is already likely coming.
I would personally like to see Canada hold firm until this issue is dropped and concluded, otherwise 30 days from now we'll be wondering again and still suffering from uncertainty.
I guess we'll see shortly if our politicians decide to keep playing or hold firm. Hard to really know what is the best answer for Canadians overall.
If you bought stocks before they dropped and you sell now, you lose money.What does this mean for someone who hasn't watched Wolf of Wallstreet?
Just breaking: A one month reprieve on Canada as well, to April 2nd. Not sure if is CUSMA trade only or across the board.
Trump is trying to save US industry because this policy is such a massive disaster, but the elevated level of uncertainty is not going to change. Just the uncertainty and the threat of tariffs alone can spark a recession, which is already likely coming.
I would personally like to see Canada hold firm until this issue is dropped and concluded, otherwise 30 days from now we'll be wondering again and still suffering from uncertainty.
I guess we'll see shortly if our politicians decide to keep playing or hold firm. Hard to really know what is the best answer for Canadians overall.
I agree that it is unlikely, but that's the mindset we are dealing with. If the strategic goal is to wreck our economy, but he only damages it, is that a win for us?Trump bluster. Being the tough guy/ bully on the block.
So you think this is something that is possible? You think he can just crash our economy and just take us over? No international laws in the way? No world opinion. Even if it were possible, Trump would be dead of old age before it happened. We could easily have diversified our trade by then, negating the threat. No matter what he thinks he can do, he can't do it without agreement from us. With us as a new voting block, the Republicans can probably forget about ever getting in power again.
California has 39 million people, Canada 40 million. California has 2 Senators and 52 House Representatives. The most of any state. Do you honestly think they will give us that much power? Beside taking an act of Congress to increase the House count?
Even if we agreed, it would still take years to complete. Trump says we'd pay no taxes? I'm sure all the other states would go for that 100% while they keep paying them.
It's a false threat. If you don't fall for the hyperbolic rhetoric, there's nothing in it. If you don't agree with that assessment, tell me how he could make it happen in his term. Tell me how he could surpass all the negotiations, laws and conditions in order to annex us.
I'll wait and see what happens when the rhetoric calms down and we get into the nuts and bolts of trade talks. Baseless threats don't figure into it for me.
Like so many leaders in the Western world? Canada aint that special - he bullies everyone.Anyone want to bet Trump forced Trudeau to 2% or more defence spending?
Looks like CUSMA things.Just breaking: A one month reprieve on Canada as well, to April 2nd. Not sure if is CUSMA trade only or across the board.
Is anyone making that legal challenge?His address last night all but admitted that his "emergency" rationale for imposing tariffs was not legit.
Looking forward to legal challenges.
Like so many leaders in the Western world? Canada aint that special - he bullies everyone.
The fact that Trump hates Freeland is definitely a point in her favour.I think that they have to go along with Trump on the deferral until April 2 and if the Orange Menace again implements the Tariffs - we go hard on them - not 30$ billion out the gate but the full 185$ billion and whatever else we need to do.
With that being said - I'm hoping that somehow this gets worked out by then. By April 2, Trudeau will be gone, a new Red leader will be in place and quite possibly we'll be in the middle of an election (I mentioned on the LPC Leadership thread that I got a text from PP yesterday saying that the 'rumour' is that the election will be called on 16 March), and things might be put on hold by Trump because Trudeau is no longer around.
I do have to say, reading into my crystal ball, Trump has for 100% certain crushed Freeland's chance of being the Red leader. The Red's realise that Trump hates her and as a result they would be committing political suicide by electing her as leader. Again, just me reading my crystal ball.