Carney isn't as 'opposite' to Trump as he's been made out to be, or acts...Any links to Red numbers falling? The aggregate of loadsa polls here shows different, although I stand to be corrected ....
View attachment 92660
... unless, of course
View attachment 92661
Well, would it be a sudden POTUS47 leaning toward more woke media outlet? Letting their media control slip? Maybe, maybe not.
Maybe Team POTUS47 wanted to have the issue come up again? Just as a way to reinforce Trump's sorta-kinda endorsement of Carney?
Maybe, maybe not.![]()
WARMINGTON: Trump prefers to 'deal' with Carney rather than Poilievre
The U.S. President says 'it’s easier to deal actually with a Liberal' since 'the Conservative that’s running is, stupidly, no friend of mine'ca.news.yahoo.com
Somehow, I don't think CBC would be able to "game" any media access system in Washington D.C. these days. EDITED TO ADD: Unless the new U.S. administration is way leakier, ideologically, than some would say, or the CBC is way more influential in D.C. than some seem to think![]()
If you watch the video I just posted, it turns out Trump may indeed genuinely want Carney to win. But not because they are politically opposite of each other, but because both could stand to profit greatly and are clearly in the same social clubs.
So his 4D chess game when he basically endorsed Carney might have been wishful thinking & false hope...