Not to mention who would end up living in Stornoway, right?... The Leader of the Conservative Party of Canada is of course a positioned by their own constitution. However, the office of Leader of the Official Opposition in the house is actually defined under Parliamentary rules, and requires that one be sitting as a Member of Parliament. So, while Poilievre can stay on as party leader should so choose, they will need to pick someone with a seat to fulfil the role of opposition leader in the house. That works against Poilievre staying on; even if someone vacates a seat for him to parachute into a safe riding, it would probably be several months before a byelection. I think Poilievre has very limited time to make survival moves ...
Offer cabinet spots to cross the floor to moderate CPC MPs?
True, but methinks this would be more likely (and I'd love to be proven wrong) under a new CPC leader than under current management.It worked before.
Still there, in fact ...Hey if we want to know what PP will now do, why don't we jsut see what he has to say about it? Exhibit A:
View attachment 93000
Yes people like myself are definitely effed. This election is about to cost me roughly $10,000. It also means that very little will be done to get resources to tidewater.The LPC took Châteauguay—Les Jardins-de-Napierville, meaning we now have a dedicated gun control individual whose main political motive is ridding Canada of all firearms ownership.
We will see if she ends up in cabinet or with a public safety nexus.
Either way no matter what the else the LPC doesn’t follow through on, we can likely expect gun control to keep ratcheting up via OICs and regulations, regardless of a parliamentary minority.
Conservatives could always be dirtbags and fire one of their MPs and dump Poilievre in the safe seat.Hey if we want to know what PP will now do, why don't we jsut see what he has to say about it? Exhibit A:
View attachment 93000
Still needs a bi election but that is exactly what they will do.Conservatives could always be dirtbags and fire one of their MPs and dump Poilievre in the safe seat.
The Liberals will not unite me as they actively scapegoat and attack me. As others in this thread have pointed out, this election has a direct financial impact on me. I have about 4k of property which is likely to get confiscated and about 16k of property which I can no longer sell making it’s actual value 0.Conservatives = MAGA/MAGA lite is the Liberal 1 and only COA.
It'll be interesting to watch them continue to push this while simultaneously talking about uniting Canada and bringing Canadians together.
The man has one of the largest pensions of any MP, ever, he could gracefully retire and never work again if he wanted to
No, I'm thinking long term survival of the party, not short term policy objectives.You’re looking at seat count for seat count’s sake; I’m looking at their ability to achieve policy objectives, which is generally my measure of a party’s efficacy.
Have we started the countdown for if/when Jenni Byrne gets shown the door for good?
Despite the fact that Carney was the only party leader endorsed by Trump.Conservatives = MAGA/MAGA lite is the Liberal 1 and only COA.
It'll be interesting to watch them continue to push this while simultaneously talking about uniting Canada and bringing Canadians together.
Anything Trump utters serves Trump, first and always. He said it because for whatever reason it suits him to.Despite the fact that Carney was the only one of the bunch endorsed by Trump.
Yes people like myself are definitely effed. This election is about to cost me roughly $10,000. It also means that very little will be done to get resources to tidewater.
The Liberals will not unite me as they actively scapegoat and attack me. As others in this thread have pointed out, this election has a direct financial impact on me. I have about 4k of property which is likely to get confiscated and about 16k of property which I can no longer sell making it’s actual value 0.
Unfortunately it sounds like they are doubling down on it, just leading to a larger rural/urban divide.
Much like the US, I haven't seen a lot of evidence of bi-partisanship out of Ottawa in the past several years. So long as the political staffers like Telford, Bryne, et al hold as much power as they do, I don't see much changing.I pretty much completely disagree with your take on the NDP. They are likely done as a meaningful federal party after this election. A vote for NDP is just an inefficient vote for the LPC.
The party would be a lot further ahead if they had a leader with any political acumen at all, and had forced the LPC to the polls back when Trudeau was still PM.
As for how the LPC should govern to hold power, the smart move would be to work with the CPC. Don't give them anything to object to too strongly, and maybe steal some of their support from the center. If the LPC stick to the NDP as their primary dance partner, they may find themselves in the losing side after another few months/years.
The vote distribution between CPC and LPC shows a pretty clear desire for centrist policy from the electorate.
and yet, most of how the CPC conducted them selves aligns a lot more with trump, its entirely possible that Trump tried to play some reverse psychology on the electorate by coming out and praising carney (he never actually endorsed him, just praised him) in order to try and use anti trump sentiment to sink him.Despite the fact that Carney was the only party leader endorsed by Trump.
Trump shares a lot lore in common with Carney than Poilievre. Trump just recognized a kindered spirit.its entirely possible that Trump tried to play some reverse psychology on the electorate by coming out and praising carney (he never actually endorsed him, just praised him) in order to try and use anti trump sentiment to sink him.