In other times there would be an expected backlash from one constituency who'll boycott the restaurant (passively or actively) as a reaction to Trump's interference. But, hanging my argument on stereotypes, there's the other constituency, who may be the expected demographic of existing Cracker Barrel patrons, whose reaction may be to increase their visits. It may result in a tie. At least until the furor dies down, realization sets in that the food hasn't improved, there's been no expansion of their customer base and no improvement in corporate profit.