- Reaction score
- 5,342
- Points
- 1,260
Congrats to all active CAF members on receiving your retro-active to April pay increases today. Well deserved and long time coming.

![]()
Korean K808 APCs and KLTV Armored Vehicles Will Be Assembled in Peru - Militarnyi
Peru has officially launched a plant that will assemble South Korean K808 wheeled armored personnel carriers and KLTV light tactical armored vehicles.militarnyi.com
Another instance of South Korea's Hyundai franchise system?
There is probably more the question of buying or creating the machinery that makes the part. Assembly as you say is akin to putting together a Lego kit that only requires limited skills supported by quality control.It also occurs to me thatthe popularity of this solution may also have to do with the difficulty in finding skilled trades. With this system Hyundai can supply Lego blocks and the future mechanics can literally learn their trade from the ground up under close supervision from factory trainers. Each client country then gets a qualfied maintenance and support system.
There is probably more the question of buying or creating the machinery that makes the part. Assembly as you say is akin to putting together a Lego kit that only requires limited skills supported by quality control.
A truly independent maintenance system requires having the tools and dies necessary to manufacture all the constituent parts of the vehicle on an indefinite basis. Anything less than that keeps you dependant on the OEM. LG1s and C3 howitzers enter the chat.
![]()
Just because something is CNC doesn’t mean it is push button and instantly works. If your making it wrong on a CNC it means your making a lot of wrong fast. One offs need constant checking in programs and making sure everything is going right. Once proven it is a different story, however your making a bunch to get away from skilled machinists as opposed to operators.Four separate trends
Lathe operators of the old school are becoming hard to find
Many parts are machined on multi-axis CNC mills
The rise of additive processes
Broken parts are replaced not repaired.
...
The Lego parts may also be turned out locally with the necessary software for the latest design being transmitted through cyberspace.
I am guessing that it is operators for that environment that Palantir is trying to recruit from high school.
The lesson to me comes from the C3 howitzer which has major issues in being repaired. The gun is dead simple. A family machine shop in a back alley in Mumbai could probably recreate any part we need (as can our Navy machine shops) but the IP problem re the C1 to C3 conversion has been a significant multi decade problem.Four separate trends
Lathe operators of the old school are becoming hard to find
Many parts are machined on multi-axis CNC mills
The rise of additive processes
Broken parts are replaced not repaired.
...
The Lego parts may also be turned out locally with the necessary software for the latest design being transmitted through cyberspace.
I am guessing that it is operators for that environment that Palantir is trying to recruit from high school.
The lesson to me comes from the C3 howitzer which has major issues in being repaired. The gun is dead simple. A family machine shop in a back alley in Mumbai could probably recreate any part we need (as can our Navy machine shops) but the IP problem re the C1 to C3 conversion has been a significant multi decade problem.
Lego part replacement is a good thing . . . if you can get the part in a timely manner from the OEM . . . or can fabricate it locally if not.
In another thread I said that I liked the FMTV - one reason is that all the parts are straightforward flat plates or standard beams that any shop should be able to field fabricate and slap on. I hate formed metal like those on most of our logistics vehicles - it always requires being tied to an OEM.
I like simple crap for the army.
![]()
Just because something is CNC doesn’t mean it is push button and instantly works. If your making it wrong on a CNC it means your making a lot of wrong fast. One offs need constant checking in programs and making sure everything is going right. Once proven it is a different story, however your making a bunch to get away from skilled machinists as opposed to operators.
Lots of parts are still repaired, it is what repair shops (like where I work) exist for. Smaller parts it is usually easier to just replace, larger it is usually easier to repair. If a bearing fit on a large shaft gets destroyed it is easier to undercut, weld, and re-machine said fit than it is to remake the whole shaft.
You would be amazed at how much of the work I do is just repairing/fixing work done on a CNC which was made incorrectly from the get go. Even quality manufacturers are accidentally letting out of spec parts through.
The military is better off having a robust supply system and a supply of quality verified parts in said system than trying to make such parts themselves. Any system bought should be enough to supply what we currently have with enough spare parts for the expected lifespan of the product and war stock.
The MilCots was a perfect example of trying to not have the supplies available on demand due to it being a ‘commercial model vehicle’ ignoring that the fleet became obsolete from civilian perspective within 5 years of being produced and as such parts became much harder to source.
Machinists can be a justified trade for the CAF. However it isn’t a fix all solution and it isn’t as easy as plug and go. You might be able to do one offs here and there, but machining also takes time, likely more time than getting it shipped to them by a good supply system.