Or it’s possible that much of this collective outrage is being manufactured, driven less by facts on the ground and more by sustained media framing designed to provoke it. ICE officers, for the most part, are enforcing laws that already exist, addressing an immigration system that many would argue has deteriorated over the past two decades due to Democratic policy choices. ICE operates nationwide, and while individual incidents absolutely deserve scrutiny, taken as a whole there are not widespread patterns of abuse.
What is widespread is the amplification of every negative encounter, presented in a way that suggests systemic misconduct rather than isolated failures. The result is a public narrative that portrays ICE as routinely victimizing Americans, which in turn fuels harassment of agents regardless of whether they are acting improperly or simply carrying out lawful duties. Each confrontation then becomes fresh material to further inflame outrage.
This creates the impression that opposition to ICE is growing broadly and even bipartisan, but that perception is largely illusory. Many American conservatives see this as a deliberate effort to delegitimize the president, DHS, and ICE itself in order to obstruct immigration enforcement altogether. From a Canadian media environment that largely mirrors U.S. progressive framing, that dynamic may be difficult to recognize, but it doesn’t make it any less real.
***
(How'd I do?)