• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Army Reserve Restructuring

They can barely provide units with RSS as it is. I’m not getting an ops WO any time soon.
I know that there are personnel shortages across most trades. Similarly there are manning priorities in play. My understanding was that RSS was a high priority manning slot. As long as that remains true then I'm okay with the fact that there will be the occasional empty slot. I'm even okay with the fact that RSS slots may be filled by personnel who have medical or physical limitations that keep them out of field units as it is - same for slots at training institutions.

I'm not as happy with the fact that many slots are being filled by Class Bs. The lack of proper training and experience makes them, on average, less useful as trainers when it comes to both senior NCM and officer slots like the OpsO or OpsWO.

My solution for Class Bs is to divide the RegF into two classes. A Class identical to what we have now and another class which would be identical in all respects but would be enrolling for service in a limited geographical area for their career - such as metro Toronto, Calgary, Montreal etc. This would provide the member a full career opportunity with family stability and provide the CAF with full-timers still able to be operationally deployed as required by it. This career class would be coupled to hybrid units in larger urban centres where the mass of our recruits come from.

🍻
 
I know that there are personnel shortages across most trades. Similarly there are manning priorities in play. My understanding was that RSS was a high priority manning slot. As long as that remains true then I'm okay with the fact that there will be the occasional empty slot. I'm even okay with the fact that RSS slots may be filled by personnel who have medical or physical limitations that keep them out of field units as it is - same for slots at training institutions.

I'm not as happy with the fact that many slots are being filled by Class Bs. The lack of proper training and experience makes them, on average, less useful as trainers when it comes to both senior NCM and officer slots like the OpsO or OpsWO.

My solution for Class Bs is to divide the RegF into two classes. A Class identical to what we have now and another class which would be identical in all respects but would be enrolling for service in a limited geographical area for their career - such as metro Toronto, Calgary, Montreal etc. This would provide the member a full career opportunity with family stability and provide the CAF with full-timers still able to be operationally deployed as required by it. This career class would be coupled to hybrid units in larger urban centres where the mass of our recruits come from.

🍻

What we should be doing, of course, is aligning Reserve Bdes with the Reg F CMBGs et al.

All Reserve training should be focused on providing the individual and collective skills upgrading to be able to augment CMBGs with either individuals or small units, or both.

Trying to build a stand alone 2nd Div into the 'second best Reg Force in Canada' is just nuts...
 
Eventually the CARBs end state will be taking the roles of the ARCG, TBG, and IRUs.
The IRU role of the CARB is the most challenging one, as the timelines are so unforgiving. It’s a quick flash to bang that the Reg battalions have sometimes struggled to meet. It clearly needs a full time commitment for at least the vanguard company role.

It’s possible that there is indeed an untapped underemployed workforce that is unwilling to enrol in the Reg Force but is eager to serve on Class B or C, using their home town armouries as platoon houses waiting for the next DomOp and doing a bit of low level training.

Or possibly a CARB will consist of ex-Regulars that realize that one way out of Shilo or Petawawa is to transfer to the PRes and live in the town/city of your choice on long term Class B or C.
 
The IRU role of the CARB is the most challenging one, as the timelines are so unforgiving. It’s a quick flash to bang that the Reg battalions have sometimes struggled to meet. It clearly needs a full time commitment for at least the vanguard company role.

It’s possible that there is indeed an untapped underemployed workforce that is unwilling to enrol in the Reg Force but is eager to serve on Class B or C, using their home town armouries as platoon houses waiting for the next DomOp and doing a bit of low level training.

Or possibly a CARB will consist of ex-Regulars that realize that one way out of Shilo or Petawawa is to transfer to the PRes and live in the town/city of your choice on long term Class B or C.

Current discussions have the CARB as a 2 or 3 year Class C contract. The bulk of troops would sign a 2 year contract, spend a year training, then a year in the breach for dom/exped ops. Key leadership would be on a 3 year contract.

There are even some discussions that all exped augmentation would come from the CARBs in the future. Troop signs on for 3 year CARB class C, 1 year of training, 1 year in the breach, then 6 months deployed with the RegF in the 3rd year.

There's a lot of questions right now that nobody seems to be have answers for, such as how many CARBs will be stood up at a time. We don't know if every CBG is going to be standing up a CARB every year (well, we know it's not this because the troops don't exist), or if its every other CBG, or its one CBG at a time.
 
Current discussions have the CARB as a 2 or 3 year Class C contract. The bulk of troops would sign a 2 year contract, spend a year training, then a year in the breach for dom/exped ops. Key leadership would be on a 3 year contract.

There are even some discussions that all exped augmentation would come from the CARBs in the future. Troop signs on for 3 year CARB class C, 1 year of training, 1 year in the breach, then 6 months deployed with the RegF in the 3rd year.

There's a lot of questions right now that nobody seems to be have answers for, such as how many CARBs will be stood up at a time. We don't know if every CBG is going to be standing up a CARB every year (well, we know it's not this because the troops don't exist), or if its every other CBG, or its one CBG at a time.
Rip augmentation from anyone higher than a Cpl haha. Most of us have work or school we can leave for a year, certainly not three.
 
There's a lot of questions right now that nobody seems to be have answers for, such as how many CARBs will be stood up at a time. We don't know if every CBG is going to be standing up a CARB every year (well, we know it's not this because the troops don't exist), or if its every other CBG, or its one CBG at a time.
PPT I saw showed a slow roll out starting with 1 CARB, and 4 coys, and then expanding from there until eventually 10 CARBs
 
Rip augmentation from anyone higher than a Cpl haha. Most of us have work or school we can leave for a year, certainly not three.

Augmentation above corporal is a joke anyways. I am starting PDT for my second deployment, I am a reserve Inf O, will I ever get to actually deploy in an infantry capacity? No, not until WW3.
 
Augmentation above corporal is a joke anyways. I am starting PDT for my second deployment, I am a reserve Inf O, will I ever get to actually deploy in an infantry capacity? No, not until WW3.
Maybe you cant but crewmen certainly can. At least up to the Sgt level. Even if its just filling holes in staff positions, there will never be enough people who can pause their life for three years for the pleasure of being a Duty O in Kuwait. The Regs have made it clear they really dont have to be filling those onesies and twosies while there are manpower crunches elsewhere.
 
Even if its just filling holes in staff positions, there will never be enough people who can pause their life for three years for the pleasure of being a Duty O in Kuwait. The Regs have made it clear they really dont have to be filling those onesies and twosies while there are manpower crunches elsewhere.

This is my point though. Outside of the Pte/Cpls who get to be a dude in a section in the infantry company in latvia, the only deployments are staff work. My trade means nothing, it doesn't matter if I am an infantry officer or a log O, or a basket weaving O, they are all GSO positions.
 
What we should be doing, of course, is aligning Reserve Bdes with the Reg F CMBGs et al.

All Reserve training should be focused on providing the individual and collective skills upgrading to be able to augment CMBGs with either individuals or small units, or both.

Trying to build a stand alone 2nd Div into the 'second best Reg Force in Canada' is just nuts...

How much of the initial reseve training could be done by Non-Regulars. Assume that the initial course is 10 weeks. Suppose the candidates were required to show up, not just with an expected level of fitness but a prescribed set of skills and knowledge. Every week shaved off the course is a 10% reduction in the demand on instructors.

This is another one of my silly ideas but ....

We have organizations in place that conduct that training. The Cadets and the Junior Rangers. Could they be engaged to take on a separate candidate flow that met at the armouries on a night different to the 13 and 14 year olds? Supplement them with access to the appropriate available on-line education materials.

Could you get the BMQ down to six weeks if everybody showed up with the skills and knowledge of a typical 16 year old cadet?

Add 6 weeks of conversion therapy to make them fit to fetch and carry in an a company.

And I know this doesn't address the trades gap but we can't make experts and soldiers in a year let alone a couple of months. So you have to recruit/buy experts and show them what their conditions of employment are going to look like. An adult path through the the Cadets might be one option to accomplish that without tying up military resources.

Would the CIC/COATS system be adaptable?
 
The Cadet Instructor Cadre (CIC)—formerly known as the Cadet Instructor List (CIL)—is a sub-component of the Canadian Armed Forces (CAF) Reserve Force dedicated to the safety, supervision, administration, and training of Sea, Army, and Air Cadets across Canada.
Canada.ca +1
Here is an overview of the CIC based on the latest available information:

Role and Function
  • Primary Duty: CIC officers are responsible for training over 52,000 cadets aged 12–18 in more than 1,100 corps and squadrons.
  • Not a Combat Force: CIC officers are not trained for deployment, and their role is focused on youth mentorship and leadership.
  • Time Commitment: They typically work with cadets one night a week and one weekend per month, along with planning and summer training opportunities.
  • Summer Employment: Full-time summer positions are available at over 20 Cadet Training Centres (CTCs).
    Canada.ca +3

Membership and Requirements
  • Background: The force consists of approximately 7,500–7,800 commissioned officers. Many are former cadets, former Regular/Reserve force members, parents, or community members.
 
Augmentation above corporal is a joke anyways. I am starting PDT for my second deployment, I am a reserve Inf O, will I ever get to actually deploy in an infantry capacity? No, not until WW3.
We did deploy reserve artillery officers to Afghanistan up to and including LCol. The current Latvia commitment is almost as big and looking for folks.

🍻
 
Augmentation above corporal is a joke anyways. I am starting PDT for my second deployment, I am a reserve Inf O, will I ever get to actually deploy in an infantry capacity? No, not until WW3.

Which is why there are far more NCMs with tours under their belts in the Reserves than Officers.

Some manage to get overseas, of course, but even then Officers usually get 'non-combat' jobs behind a desk versus commanding troops in the field. Or used to at any rate.

That's not their fault, and it's a big professional development gap unfortunately.
 
Back
Top