• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

CAF Security Forces [Split from RCN Anti Drone Weapon]

It is interesting in their course training plan that they will do 14 days (of 65) on the range split across pistol, rifle, MG (M240) and grenade.
 
A bit more on USAF base security developments.


I think the guy that wants to be able to take out drone manufacturing fails to understand the nature of the threat. Small drones and 3D printers don't need large factories nor do they need long supply chains from remote points of origin. They can be created local to the target.
 
A bit more on USAF base security developments.

The reports coming now out of Egypt that one of their LNG facilities located on the Med has been hit by drones and ships damaged is another example that facilities located a fair to great distance from hostilities and have no apparent link to hostilities can be randomly attacked should be a wake up call to us and all others.

Would be interesting to see what route this drone took to get to Damietta Port in Egypt if it turns out that it came from Iran.

Google Maps
 
Robot counters.

AeroVironment is better known foe building drones (Switchblade among others) but is being tasked to build CUAS base defence systems


"The Pentagon’s dedicated unit tasked with acquiring and fielding counter-drone solutions has tapped AeroVironment (AV) to supply its Titan MS (multi-sensor) surveillance system.

"The Joint Interagency Task Force 401 (JIATF-401) awarded AV an $80.5-million contract, part of a broader $500-million indefinite delivery, indefinite quantity sole-source contract, in support of the Pentagon’s “Domestic Shield” initiative of strengthening homeland capabilities against uncrewed system threats.

"It follows a previous JIATF-401 order of a Titan Cerberus XL counter-drone system in March, also in support of Domestic Shield."





....

My sense of this issue is that given the civil-military threat to all infrastructure (and for my purposes Very Large Crude Carriers and other ships are floating and mobile infrastructure) that a lot of this point defence will end up integrated within existing civil security systems designed to manage air space, keep out trespassers, manage bird strikes and protect against pirates, thieves and terrorists. I also suspect a high degree of automation.

It will be interesting to see how the interface between kinetic and non-kinetic responses gets managed. Kinetic, in my sense, means the application of explosive devices as opposed to directed energy and RF systems. And in that gray are is a kinetic device that relies entirely on its kinetic energy to ram an intruder different than the exact same device armed like a conventional cannon shell with a proximity fuse and a fragmenting warhead?

And what is the nature of the fragments? How close to civilians can they be employed?
 
Last edited:
Back
Top