The Patriot was originally slated for replacement and obsolescence. MBDA and LocMart had won the replacement with MEADS. Now Raytheon and LocMart modernized a lot of Patriot systems to give options like MEADS did, but Patriot really isn’t the system for C-UAS and dealing with OWAUs or LM’s.
It’s primarily a AMD system for SCUD type systems, AGM’s and INF types missiles.
Using Patriot and TTHAAD for non ballistic threats is like taking a Sniper Rifle to shoot ants — sure it can work, but it isn’t efficient.
The AD/C-UAS/C-RAM network needs a lot of layers -
The USG interfering and trying to control the deal is the worst of both worlds.
I mean, you're right, firing a 4 million dollar patriot at a 20k shahed isn't the way to go.
But Ukraine realized that years ago. They have the sting series of drone interceptors for the low-grade stuff, 2k a pop to knock out a 20k shahed.
It's precisely what the Patriot is meant to shoot down, ballistic missiles, that the Ukrainians need right now. Because Western supply lines are struggling to keep pace, Ukraine simply isn't getting them at the scale they need.
They are too expensive, too slow to build, and too slow to stockpile. That leaves the USA, the Gulf, and NATO in general in a rough spot.
The one thing that can help is giving the Ukrainians the specs to the PAC-2 so they can strip out all the bells and whistles. Creating a cheap but effective, easy to mass-produce alternative would help Ukraine and the West.
And again, it’s the PAC-2. While that production line has recently restarted in the West to help deal with global shortages, it's not the bread and butter for Lockheed and Raytheon anymore. The only reason to withhold it is if they genuinely believe the Ukrainians will improve upon it so greatly it surpasses the PAC-3.