Canada moves to 2% GDP end of FY25/26 - PMMC

[daftandbarmy]

Are things bad enough that cannibalizing the cadet organization is really worth talking about?

Based on the size of the instructor in this photo you’d need a pretty hungry cannibal

View this content on Instagram

View this content on Instagram

 

[MilEME09]

Figure a million dollars a lane at that point — on top of a ~10m initial investment.
On top of air handler issues, the confined space increases risks of TBI/CSE. Even suppressed carbine/rifle fire isn’t hearing safe / and so to make safe working conditions one end up with a much larger range.
So your 10 lane range is now widened to what 30-50 would have on an outdoor. And now you are at a $50-60M range just so you can cycle 10 shooters at a time through a PWT?

Outdoor ranges are vastly preferable.

Thanks, didn't realize the cost was so high, plenty of land available to make out door ranges. Especially at some of the cadet camps in the Rockies.

 

[McG]

COATS ( Cadet Organizations Administration and Training Service) is operated by the Cadet Istructor Cadre who are voluntary members of the Primary Reserve …

No. COATS & Primary Reserve are separate sub-components of the Reserve Force.

QR&O: Volume I - Chapter 2 Government and Organization - Canada.ca

Queen's Regulations and Orders - QR&O - Chapter 2 - Government and Organization

www.canada.ca

 

[YZT580]

Thanks, didn't realize the cost was so high, plenty of land available to make out door ranges. Especially at some or the cadet camps in the Rockies.

we had them at one time. There is one here in Niagara still marked as a range but with the berms having been flattened. I doubt if that is the only one DND has sitting in the bushes.

 

[MilEME09]

we had them at one time. There is one here in Niagara still marked as a range but with the berms having been flattened. I doubt if that is the only one DND has sitting in the bushes.

Kipp range is in the middle of no where near lethbridge and used heavily, DND recently starting improving the site. However they are limited because of endangered wildlife living in the area

 

[KevinB]

Thanks, didn't realize the cost was so high, plenty of land available to make out door ranges. Especially at some or the cadet camps in the Rockies.

A lot of LEA’s are finding that while their indoor range was great for pistol shooting, rifle (even if designed to operate safely with rifle ammunition) cause massive concussion issues.

Making an outdoor range for rifle qualifications doesn’t require a massive footprint as one can add baffles that restrict the possibility of a round leaving the facility (CBP Facility at Harper’s Ferry WV has that sort of setup).

 

[ytz]

I played around with Gemini to see what building a network of indoor training ranges similar to the latest in Singapore would look like and cost for Canada. Result:

 

[Halifax Tar]

There is a Regional Cadet Support Unit in each region, I believe the majority are Class B, but I was under the impression that there was a few Reg Force scattered about in the organization?

I have reg force MMTs posted in to the cadet support unit in Shearwater.

 

[McG]

There is a Regional Cadet Support Unit in each region, I believe the majority are Class B, but I was under the impression that there was a few Reg Force scattered about in the organization?

The suggestion was to take "CIC PYs" - there is no such thing. The handful of Reg F PYs in cadet support units are not CIC; they are Reg F.

I played around with Gemini to see what building a network of indoor training ranges similar to the latest in Singapore would look like and cost for Canada.

Why? That is a huge investment in indoor ranges with the greatest concentration of your proposal's investment going to places that have existing outdoor ranges (and many of those places have space for more outdoor ranges if needed).

 

[KevinB]

Why? That is a huge investment in indoor ranges with the greatest concentration of your proposal's investment going to places that have existing outdoor ranges (and many of those places have space for more outdoor ranges if needed).

Singapore (unlike Canada) is very land limited - they build up as they cannot go out.
They have two real training areas - and neither is big, as well due to their territory. Urban Operations and Subterranean Operations are very relevant, so making training facilities to support that is smart.

 

[McG]

Singapore (unlike Canada) is very land limited - they build up as they cannot go out.
They have two real training areas - and neither is big, as well due to their territory. Urban Operations and Subterranean Operations are very relevant, so making training facilities to support that is smart.

I get that, but why propose building similar facilities in Petawawa, Valcartier, and Gagetown?

 

[Kirkhill]

A lot of LEA’s are finding that while their indoor range was great for pistol shooting, rifle (even if designed to operate safely with rifle ammunition) cause massive concussion issues.

Making an outdoor range for rifle qualifications doesn’t require a massive footprint as one can add baffles that restrict the possibility of a round leaving the facility (CBP Facility at Harper’s Ferry WV has that sort of setup).

How do you feel about virtual ranges for basic weapons handling, sight pictures and breath control?

An in-armoury adjunct to outside ranges.

 

[ytz]

Why? That is a huge investment in indoor ranges with the greatest concentration of your proposal's investment going to places that have existing outdoor ranges (and many of those places have space for more outdoor ranges if needed).

Few points.

Something that impressed me about the Singaporean facility was the accessibility and the mindset behind it. They made it clear that this facility allows a lot of people to come in and train very easily. They have more than ranges there. Basically, you can get a full readiness checkout in a day and get there by subway. You can do parts of it in an afternoon. And you can book timeslots with an app for a shoot, gas hut, medical, first aid class, etc. I asked them about the motivation behind this (other that the obvious space constraint). And the answer has always stuck with me: "We wanted to make it as easy as possible for people to serve. Even if it's a few hours per year."

I would argue that in a lot of urban and suburban Canada we face similar space and commuting constraints. Fewer people will sign up if they have to drive an hour each way for parade night. Hence my 25 min constraint for half the population. And the same holds true if you have to do weekends away at training areas. Very different time commitment if you reach your range by GO Bus and go home after that on a Saturday night. This moves a whole lot of training local, negates the weather element and makes it possible to even do shoots on a parade night.

Debatable on whether bases should have the same facilities. But mostly my thought was extra capacity, reserve training support in the area (Valcartier covering Quebec City), and stand in for other infrastructure in my cost estimate. And heck, I'm sure our Regular CA folks would also like to have ranges they can use year round that add more training value beyond weather exposure.

Basically a very ROME of what it would it take to the kind of advanced reserve support the Singaporeans have.

 

[ytz]

Singapore (unlike Canada) is very land limited - they build up as they cannot go out.
They have two real training areas - and neither is big, as well due to their territory. Urban Operations and Subterranean Operations are very relevant, so making training facilities to support that is smart.

And unlike many of our reservists, they aren't doing virtual or simunition at that facility. It's the full fat version.

 

[FJAG]

I'm just calling it that for lack of a better term. No idea what they will actually call it. I have a friend working at CMP on this and like I said they seem to see this as closer to Supp Res than PRes

Whatever it is, it will need a new subcomponent of the ResF. SuppRes is to specific and is useful as a separate category for previously trained RegF or PRes. Canadian Rangers might do - I figure the training and equipping and terms of service as similar but all-in-all a new subcomponent is easy to make and can be clearly tailored.

Adding 300k to anything more than Supp Res requires a substantial rejigging of a whole bunch of institutional systems.

I had trouble modeling anything over 100,000 (also assuming the PRes goes to about 80,000)

 

[ytz]

Given the SRP mandates ARes soldiers only shoot PWT1 every year. We only need 100m ranges. One or two 10 lane indoor ranges per major city would probably save a lot of transport costs.

Firstly, is that even an appropriate readiness standard going forward? Maybe CA reservists should have more allocated to them per year than an air force desk jockey like me in Ottawa.

Second, why not build more than just annual basic readiness? The more training that been be done locally, the more interest we'll have, the better the reserve experience and the more skilled they'll be. We should aim to be able to do all of BMQ and most of BMQ-L locally. Just throw in a field phase on weekends or in the summer.

Third for me is proximity. There has to be some goal. Do we want half the population within a 30 min drive, 45 min transit ride, etc. of a training facility? I'm particularly thinking of the reality that the number of driving licenses and car ownership is declining among young people. In any major city, you'll see young reservists taking the subway in.

 

[daftandbarmy]

Firstly, is that even an appropriate readiness standard going forward? Maybe CA reservists should have more allocated to them per year than an air force desk jockey like me in Ottawa.

Second, why not build more than just annual basic readiness? The more training that been be done locally, the more interest we'll have, the better the reserve experience and the more skilled they'll be. We should aim to be able to do all of BMQ and most of BMQ-L locally. Just throw in a field phase on weekends or in the summer.

Agreed...

IMHO, the average 18 or 19 year old reservist is a largely untapped resource of readiness. Keen, fit, smart as a whip and ready to take on the toughest challenges.

Too often, the training offered during the school year fails to meet their expectations in terms of skills development and progressively more challenging intensity.

More shooting, more battle fitness, more advanced collective and technical training... it's all possible with the right leadership and budgets.

 

[McG]

Third for me is proximity. There has to be some goal. Do we want half the population within a 30 min drive, 45 min transit ride, etc. of a training facility?

If you want your new facilities connected to public transit, don't put them on the big army bases that you have proposed. Even Edmonton Transit does not go to CFB Edmonton, and the other big bases are not in cities.

 

[ytz]

If you want your new facilities connected to public transit, don't put them on the big army bases that you have proposed. Even Edmonton Transit does not go to CFB Edmonton, and the other big bases are not in cities.

You'll notice that I didn't only put them on big bases. My criteria was 50% population within 25 min drive. And 80% within 60 mins drive. That first criteria should make any urban/suburban facility about 45-60 mins max by transit. The facilities I told Gemini to put on bases like Edmonton and Valcartier are largely there to provide training to the city they are in. Edmonton got a second facility too. But sure we can impose transit accessibility too. It was just my first WAG.

 

[Halifax Tar]

If you want your new facilities connected to public transit, don't put them on the big army bases that you have proposed. Even Edmonton Transit does not go to CFB Edmonton, and the other big bases are not in cities.

Halifax ? It is or was the biggest personnel base in the CAF.