• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

CAN-USA Tariff Strife (split from various pol threads)

James Dean Garriock, 49.


This specific case seems less a matter of ‘lowering the temperature’, and more a single individual who’s completely unhinged.
There is a somewhat concerning number of unhinged people on the internet calling for/or at least hopeful for a US annexation, to fix the "woke" in Canada. Particularly if you wander into the cesspit of CGN's more political sub-forums...

Too many people terminally online in their weirdo echo-chambers, and not coming up for air in the real world.
 
Particularly if you wander into the cesspit of CGN's more political sub-forums...

They creep me out...

The Office Jim GIF
 
Interesting ramifications of the Iran quagmire: the spike in oil prices may significantly offset our economic losses due to U.S. tariffs.


I have to wonder what that will do to our trade surplus that the U.S. is so super happy about?
Not to worry. They'll get all they need from their new vassal state of Venezuela.

Besides, prices are going to tumble . . . after the midterms. He said so, so it must be true.
 
The U.S. would have to buy effectively all of Belarus’ potash to replace what they get from Canada; roughly half of our exports go to the U.S.

If they did this, everyone Belarus currently exports to would need to find new suppliers. As potash is a commodity, existing suppliers and purchasers would find each other through normal mechanisms, and all purchasers would simply pay a bit more for a less cost effective supply. Someone else would still buy our potash.

If U.S. purchasers could get a better price for Belarusian potash, they already would be doing so. I can only see this happening if the U.S. abandons current sanctions on Belarus and drops existing tariffs.
 
That will be interesting when you consider that Belarus is 5,000+ miles from the US and Canada is literally right next door!
How will this Belarus potash be transported?

Poland does not allow any Belarus fertilizer to be transported through its territory. The same with the Baltic states. Fertilizer is one of the banned export items.
 
The U.S. would have to buy effectively all of Belarus’ potash to replace what they get from Canada; roughly half of our exports go to the U.S.

If they did this, everyone Belarus currently exports to would need to find new suppliers. As potash is a commodity, existing suppliers and purchasers would find each other through normal mechanisms, and all purchasers would simply pay a bit more for a less cost effective supply. Someone else would still buy our potash.

If U.S. purchasers could get a better price for Belarusian potash, they already would be doing so. I can only see this happening if the U.S. abandons current sanctions on Belarus and drops existing tariffs.

Brazil, India, and China being their biggest customers. Does buddy not know potash is basically a global commodity just like oil is? Those gaps created would quickly be filled (by us) and all he'd get for it is higher prices for Americans exclusively, on top of giving leverage to a Russian vassal.

On top of all this the new mine starting up in Jansen is going to bring us to 4x more Potash production compared to Belarus over the next decade, it being 🇨🇦25 million tons vs 🇧🇾7 million tons now.
 
Back
Top