- Reaction score
- 7,660
- Points
- 1,260
Especially if, as it seems in many cases, it's toxic women who are acting toxically towards other women. Just saying
Liberal (Minority/Majority) Government 2025 - ???
- Thread starter Altair
- Start date
daftandbarmy
Army.ca Fossil
- Reaction score
- 47,645
- Points
- 1,160
- Reaction score
- 7,660
- Points
- 1,260
Despite the narrative that is developed over the last 3 to 4 years, if not longer in the Canadian armed forces, things may not be as they seem. Another way to say that is that the opposite of toxic masculinity is not enlightened femininity. It is in fact toxic femininity
- Reaction score
- 5,688
- Points
- 1,160
There are many female executive versions of George Patton. None are as stylish as he was.
- Reaction score
- 3,604
- Points
- 1,210
There's a reason that they say "nurses eat their young".
- Reaction score
- 10,347
- Points
- 1,140
How misogynist of you, off to the re-education camps!
daftandbarmy
Army.ca Fossil
- Reaction score
- 47,645
- Points
- 1,160
Queen Bee syndrome enters the chat 
Workplace bullying is often discussed as a gendered power struggle that centers around the narrative of men who are in authority positions abusing their power and influence in ways that lead to the mistreatment of women below them. That dynamic absolutely exists, but it isn’t the full picture. A growing body of research suggests that some of the most persistent and damaging workplace bullying experienced by women comes not only from men, but surprisingly, from other women. This stark reality may be uncomfortable to label, but it’s essential to address. More importantly, it’s important to understand that bullying between and among women is not rooted in them being inherently and uniquely unkind but speaks to a much larger and more critical issue that highlights systems and organizational cultures and structures that exist to reward competition over collaboration among women. Workplace bullying is a leadership issue, not a personality problem. Although not always blatantly clear, for leaders committed to building equitable and high-performing workplaces, who choose to ignore this pattern can pay a devastating cost.
www.forbes.com
Beyond ‘Mean Girls’: Women-To-Women Bullying At Work And What Leaders Can Do About It
Workplace bullying is often discussed as a gendered power struggle that centers around the narrative of men who are in authority positions abusing their power and influence in ways that lead to the mistreatment of women below them. That dynamic absolutely exists, but it isn’t the full picture. A growing body of research suggests that some of the most persistent and damaging workplace bullying experienced by women comes not only from men, but surprisingly, from other women. This stark reality may be uncomfortable to label, but it’s essential to address. More importantly, it’s important to understand that bullying between and among women is not rooted in them being inherently and uniquely unkind but speaks to a much larger and more critical issue that highlights systems and organizational cultures and structures that exist to reward competition over collaboration among women. Workplace bullying is a leadership issue, not a personality problem. Although not always blatantly clear, for leaders committed to building equitable and high-performing workplaces, who choose to ignore this pattern can pay a devastating cost.
Beyond ‘Mean Girls’: Women-To-Women Bullying At Work And What Leaders Can Do About It
Workplace bullying between women is not a personality problem. It's a leadership issue that highlights organizational cultures that reward competition over collaboration among women.
www.forbes.com
QV
Army.ca Fixture
- Reaction score
- 5,204
- Points
- 1,040
From my limited view, beliefs such as hers articulated in that article are few in defence. The purge has been successful. Please correct me if I’m wrong. I think she had it exactly correct.
- Reaction score
- 7,660
- Points
- 1,260
I'm not so sure about a purge. She definitely was on the right track and she and I agreed on so much. There are others in in the senior levels of the CAF who also share some of her views.
In my experience, Policy people in the PS (and often academia) have a tendency to be quite staid in their thinking. The knock-on effect of that is bigger than one would think. Especially in the public service. There isn't really a leadership class or a route to leadership in the public service that doesn't go through the gateway of being a policy person. In the PS, the opposite of a policy person is someone that is in ops. You can see how that may manifest itself. In fact, it's pretty obvious that it is already manifesting itself across the public service.
Just a few thoughts
In my experience, Policy people in the PS (and often academia) have a tendency to be quite staid in their thinking. The knock-on effect of that is bigger than one would think. Especially in the public service. There isn't really a leadership class or a route to leadership in the public service that doesn't go through the gateway of being a policy person. In the PS, the opposite of a policy person is someone that is in ops. You can see how that may manifest itself. In fact, it's pretty obvious that it is already manifesting itself across the public service.
Just a few thoughts
“Fearless advice, loyal implementation”. It’s the old public service bargain that they should offer the best advice possible and keep concerns and criticism private, then loyally carry out the policies determined by those who are politically accountable.
Now with that said, when someone is specifically and deliberately interchanged to an external organization that has a specific place in the policy debate ecosystem, meaningful participation therein should mean that person is, within reason, afforded the latitude of the hat they wear. Otherwise a fair bit of the point is probably lost.
ArmyRick
Army.ca Fixture
- Reaction score
- 4,108
- Points
- 1,160
Snark free post.
Northern Perspective once again provides some insight into the goings on in parliamentary committees and motion debates.
Very, very concerning that the CBC, yes the CBC, the NDP, the greens, the bloc and of course the Conservatives are really upset about motions and bills not be debated or very little debate.
This is NOT a good look in my perspective and refelcts poorly on the governing Liberals.
AI Summary, Mr @Altair ?
Northern Perspective once again provides some insight into the goings on in parliamentary committees and motion debates.
Very, very concerning that the CBC, yes the CBC, the NDP, the greens, the bloc and of course the Conservatives are really upset about motions and bills not be debated or very little debate.
This is NOT a good look in my perspective and refelcts poorly on the governing Liberals.
AI Summary, Mr @Altair ?
- Reaction score
- 3,018
- Points
- 1,140
Free of charge.
AI ASSISTED
This video from Northern Perspective criticizes the Mark Carney government for its use of programming motions to fast-track controversial legislation through Parliament (10:24-11:00). The video draws attention to the concerns of a CBC At Issue panel, which described the government's tactics—such as cutting off debate and limiting witness testimony—as unprecedented (0:34-0:40, 6:22-6:38).
Key Highlights:
This video from Northern Perspective criticizes the Mark Carney government for its use of programming motions to fast-track controversial legislation through Parliament (10:24-11:00). The video draws attention to the concerns of a CBC At Issue panel, which described the government's tactics—such as cutting off debate and limiting witness testimony—as unprecedented (0:34-0:40, 6:22-6:38).
Key Highlights:
- The Legislative Process: The video explains how the government uses programming motions to bypass traditional parliamentary debate, specifically citing Bill C-22 (the lawful access bill) as an example of legislation being forced through without sufficient scrutiny (11:00-12:00, 13:42-14:30).
- Parliamentary Accountability: MP Frank Caputo and other opposition members express deep frustration, arguing that limiting debate prevents proper oversight, which could lead to poorly written legislation and future constitutional challenges (13:28-14:30, 18:18-18:43).
- Comparative Analysis: The creator contrasts the current government's speed in passing Bill C-22 with the slower, more deliberative process used for similar legislation during the Stephen Harper era, noting that the current process involves significantly fewer committee meetings and witness testimonies (26:24-28:10).
Please direct all responses to this AI summary to @ArmyRick , please and thank you.
I in no way, shape or form support or even agree with the commentary is the afformentioned video.
Thank you for your attention to this matter.
- Reaction score
- 13,213
- Points
- 1,160
How does AI know what's in the video? Does it play the 30 minute video and then summarize it? Read some kind of transcript of the video? Check chat rooms for reactions to it?
- Reaction score
- 3,018
- Points
- 1,140
Agree with all of your comments, and that she has a good case. However, I wonder what her motivation was to write that piece and have it published. From her position as a DG in north tower at pearkes, it seems she had the ‘fearless advice’ part of the equation covered but what about the ‘loyal implementation’? She would have known before the article was published that it could cause problems. Maybe I’m biased though since I’ve become allergic to individuals that refer to themselves as ‘architects’.
She had a great position as DG Strat policy to influence decisions and argue for the type of cases she outlines in the article. Maybe not sufficiently enough for her though, politics next perhaps?
- Reaction score
- 28,055
- Points
- 1,360
Because she achieved what she set out to do with her opinion piece?
I respect your insight and perspective operating in similar circles, but a couple things come to mind, but I’ll limit it to two major points that come to mind:
1) I believe the title of her opinion piece was unnecessarily inflammatory. While she didn’t have the experience of the likes of Vincent Rigby or Dick Fadden, she went in tactically guns blazing and an issue that could have been more convincing without the bombast; and
2) She most likely would have been consulted on the draft of the G&M article following up on her secondment and know that she was described as the ‘principle author’ of the policy. Technically, would that not have been ADM(Pol) themselves, with her (DG Def Pol), PCO Ln, DG IS Pol, Cab Ln and others also participating? While she wasn’t a mere secretary taking notes, I think she stretched her purported pivotal ‘architectural work’ in the publication of the DP.
This is not to say that she doesn’t have a case, she most likely does, as you point out, but she absolutely knew she was poking the bear, as it were. I’ll continue to look for the writings of Rigby, Fadden, Vigneault and others to make well-considered and communicated cases for Canada getting more serious with foreign intervention and nefarious work by our adversaries and the place that economic factors and policies have in that space.
2¢
- Reaction score
- 13,213
- Points
- 1,160
Maybe her loyalty shifted to Canada over the government.
Every Polish girl I know is like above average pretty. And Polish people tend to be pretty awesome (in my experience anyway)
I'm okay with this for now
HavokFour
Army.ca Veteran
- Reaction score
- 3,950
- Points
- 1,040
Not the brightest bulb, is he?
lfpress.com
Man who threw stones at Justin Trudeau charged with threatening Mark Carney
Shane Marshall is charged with uttering threats to cause death.
lfpress.com
Similar threads
