PrairieFella
Army.ca Veteran
- Reaction score
- 4,446
- Points
- 1,110
How dare he be too diligent?

Mmmmm, yes.How dare he be too diligent?
Being conspiratorial about it is a personal choice. Treachery under every stone.Mmmmm, yes.
It's probably just a matter of Carney asking if he's allowed to use some annual leave. Nothing deeper than than.
Something something derangement syndrome.Being conspiratorial about it is a personal choice. Treachery under every stone.
Or he's meeting with friends in very senior governmental / corporate positions from various parts of Italy and getting it squared away in advance.Mmmmm, yes.
It's probably just a matter of Carney asking if he's allowed to use some annual leave. Nothing deeper than than.
A suspicious mind is a healthy mind.Being conspiratorial about it is a personal choice. Treachery under every stone.
The real question here is what was Poilievre doing?!Something something derangement syndrome.
Throwing rocks in a pond, trying to see what will sink faster, the rock or his poll numbers.The real question here is what was Poilievre doing?!
Another example of Conservatives attacking the environment.Throwing rocks in a pond, trying to see what will sink faster, the rock or his poll numbers.
Or he's meeting with friends in very senior governmental / corporate positions from various parts of Italy and getting it squared away in advance.
PMMC clearing stuff with the ethics people first shows way more respect for his office and Canadians in general than his "I didn't know any better" predecessors.Yeah I figured he might be visiting friends who are skookum muckamucks and wanted to make sure everything was ok, and avoid the jackpot Trudeau got into with the Aga Khan.
PMMC clearing stuff with the ethics people first shows way more respect for his office and Canadians in general than his "I didn't know any better" predecessors.
How dare he be too diligent?
Not declaring someone who represents the largest potential threat to your country, actively threatening your sovereignty persona non-grata is dumb.That petition is dumb. Dude’s job is to represent his nation’s interests in Canada and to carry out engagement and diplomacy. He’s doing that job. What we don’t like is the underlying policy and diplomatic approach.
At least through him we get a really good eye into what the administration wants here, through a not-too-thick filter.
And then they send someone else who says the exact same things. You’re not thought this through. Maintaining diplomatic relations may mean accepting the said diplomat will say stupid shit. This is a cutting off nose to spite face sort of thing.Not declaring someone who represents the largest potential threat to your country, actively threatening your sovereignty persona non-grata is dumb.
I think it’s a bit late to kick him out, but the day he made those comments or the day they learned of them he should have been sent packing.
Yeah he might be representing his masters but that doesn’t mean we need to tolerate such disrespect.
Sometimes you need to cut off diplomatic relations to prove a point. When you reach a red line (and suggesting annexing your country is one of them IMO) you need to make it very clear they passed it and not to again.And then they send someone else who says the exact same things. You’re not thought this through. Maintaining diplomatic relations may mean accepting the said diplomat will say stupid shit. This is a cutting off nose to spite face sort of thing.
Declaring someone PNG, even an ambassador, is not the same as breaking off diplomatic relations. They would just send somebody else and, given this Administration, would likely also be a dick.Sometimes you need to cut off diplomatic relations to prove a point. When you reach a red line (and suggesting annexing your country is one of them IMO) you need to make it very clear they passed it and not to again.
Otherwise why even have persona non-grata? Why not just let anyone walk all over us, clearly we lack the stomach to do anything about it.
Total tax bill has increased by 2,928% since 1961
Since 1961, the total tax bill faced by average Canadian families has increased by 2,928%, compared to a 2,322% rise in income, 2,349% for shelter, 952% for food, 526% for clothing and a 946% increase in the consumer price index.
If that’s the average CDN family paying that much in taxes just imagine how much more that the 20% of the population that pays 65% of all income taxes pays?Anyone surprised ?
![]()
Canadians spent more on taxes than basic necessities in 2025: Study
The average Canadian family last year spent more on paying taxes than for basic necessities of shelter, food and clothing combined. More.torontosun.com