- Reaction score
- 42,947
- Points
- 1,210
Well, we're talking about people not in the Regular Force being told to respond to an emergency - clearly a Reserve Recruiting thread
Next up we have to figure out what sort of hats they'd wear.
Canada moves to 2% GDP end of FY25/26 - PMMC
- Thread starter Maxman1
- Start date
Next up we have to figure out what sort of hats they'd wear.
The trickier part would be titling it in olde English.
- Reaction score
- 29
- Points
- 280
Might I suggest 'Doom: Fyrd to Freedom'
- Reaction score
- 18,951
- Points
- 1,160
Now imagine if we had gone with the South Koreans on the sub purchase and formed a industrial agreement between the 3? KSS-III, K9's and K2 for everyone!
PrairieFella
Army.ca Veteran
- Reaction score
- 4,703
- Points
- 1,110
These are those perfect opportunities to build that middle power alliance. Polish drones are no joke.
- Reaction score
- 8,657
- Points
- 1,260
I’m feeling more and more that Poland is going to buy a Candu reactor from us.
- Reaction score
- 42,947
- Points
- 1,210
And form a cooperative research group with India and Pakistan?
- Reaction score
- 8,657
- Points
- 1,260
More likely us and Poland…..
- Reaction score
- 42,947
- Points
- 1,210
India and Pakistan both bought CANDU and used it as a springboard to develop their own nuclear weapons. That was the subtext.
- Reaction score
- 5,766
- Points
- 1,160
Not until the uniforms, buttons, buckles and badges for the Volksturm is discussed into oblivion.
- Reaction score
- 8,657
- Points
- 1,260
Oh I completely understand.
I don’t see them in this equation, but I do see Poland.
- Reaction score
- 28,353
- Points
- 1,360
PC, we should make a catch-all thread called: “Toques and Gloves”
daftandbarmy
Army.ca Fossil
- Reaction score
- 47,926
- Points
- 1,160
- Reaction score
- 5,766
- Points
- 1,160
Some tidbits to remember if the spending bonanza comes to a screeching end…
I don’t know how strong the public sentiment is for 3.5 % but whatever we are truly at (it’s not really increased to 2% but has definitely “realigned” to 2%) has made some small difference. Once the really big money flows we’ll see if it can be sustained.
A political change in Ottawa (or Washington) leadership can snuff that out fairly quickly. Defence, is after all, a “dirty word” to an influential segment of the population.
I don’t know how strong the public sentiment is for 3.5 % but whatever we are truly at (it’s not really increased to 2% but has definitely “realigned” to 2%) has made some small difference. Once the really big money flows we’ll see if it can be sustained.
A political change in Ottawa (or Washington) leadership can snuff that out fairly quickly. Defence, is after all, a “dirty word” to an influential segment of the population.
Attachments
Good news. We don't have the people to spend 2.5%. Let alone 3.5%. So.....
- Reaction score
- 13,875
- Points
- 1,160
Assume that the 5% estimate of what was required to defend NATO and maintain the liberal order was based on existing technologies and perceived capabilities of our enemies. What happens if technology reduces costs? What happens if the financial burden swings from sustaining large numbers of troops to large amounts of capital equipment and consumables?
People are the LimFac. See my above point.
Notably all the staff weanies and procurement folks. ADMs in Carling are fighting over engineers and procurement folks. Some are working multiple projects. Which is a recipe for burnout long run. But because of the way government works, it's not just DND, every other government departments involved in defence procurement has to staff up too.
- Reaction score
- 13,875
- Points
- 1,160
So we need to free up people to change but we can't free up people until we change?
PS as a "consultant" I am not a fan of bringing in consultants, not unless they have shop floor experience. Where new technology is being debated the people learning should be the people that will use it.
