Search results

Famously common sights in Canada

AXPs are still a thing. The Ukranians would prefer to use these if they could / had them, if only because of higher capacity per trip and better life expectancy. If if youre extracting off the x on a pick up - these just moves back a step. In the world of 20k dead zones bot a bad thing.

You asserted very wrong data. Loaded vs clean is confusing for you i think? The RCAF alert air craft are launched armed. We aren't going to send unarmed air craft on intercept missions. Why lunch an F35 it is carrying weapons seems like a weird question. While certainly its stealth would be...

There's more F35 in Europe alone than Gripens. The advantage is purely giving the us the finger. We need it to be able to kill other planes both in our air space and abroad. We need it to do that efficiently and at a very high win loss ratio. Thats its job. When we say "less effective or...

How many Gripens to have the sensor picture of the F35s? Or air combat capability. Recent examples seem to point to a 6:1 ratio.

Meanwhile the CBC mines the interview to craft a controversy.

Flags and ranks being badges.... The risk of exposed Velcro is also high on the concern list.

Or be like the Poles and instead of having a freeloader vehicle " we use soldier"

If you go on SharePoint point you'll find some spirited debate about the badge policy for the new uniform ongoing.

Yeah huge improvement

https://www.reddit.com/r/CanadianForces/s/egMEit9jGf The instructions for the new DICE armour was posted. Includes a break down of what will be issued.

Dont need to be that long of endurance to work over the flot Potentially, veg will be the largest factor. Change your mindset - detected equals engaged. So stripping armour is a high risk activity. Plan your route accordingly. Please provide an example of conventional coalition forces...

They're optimized to be CPs and Ambs and the shape follows. Same height as a lav 6 turret.

Its not at all like the m113, it simply is too big to be close to the flot.

I think it was more about driving to have actual armour instead of fake shit on live ranges.

I've not once seen that scenario

UAS can operate in the arctic, and in jungles. Thats a poorly thought out argument. You will be located, you will be targeted, if thats an FPV or by a recce fires complex it makes no difference. Mitigation of exhaustion is a poor reason to accept higher casualties from the most likely result...

Sorry I wanted to add this in. We teach that the infil is always the most dangerous portion of a patrol. So why would we wear our least protection during the most dangerous phase?

The idea of humping out your armour is flawed, deeply. It comes from the idea that the threat is direct fire from an enemy detecting visually by soldiers on the ground. Thats simply not going to be the case. If you're detected on a patrol you will be engaged by indirect or drone fire and they...

Certainly hope so